[jira] [Updated] (KYLIN-3379) timestampadd test coverage is not enough

2018-08-06 Thread Shaofeng SHI (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shaofeng SHI updated KYLIN-3379:

Fix Version/s: v2.5.0

> timestampadd test coverage is not enough
> 
>
> Key: KYLIN-3379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379
> Project: Kylin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: v2.3.1
>Reporter: hongbin ma
>Assignee: hongbin ma
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: v2.5.0
>
>
> complex cases like 
> timestampadd(MONTH,23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) or 
> timestampadd(MONTH,-23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) is not covered. 
>  
> And my tests shows this kind of queries will fail IT. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KYLIN-3379) timestampadd test coverage is not enough

2018-06-15 Thread Shaofeng SHI (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shaofeng SHI updated KYLIN-3379:

Fix Version/s: (was: v2.4.0)

> timestampadd test coverage is not enough
> 
>
> Key: KYLIN-3379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379
> Project: Kylin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: v2.3.1
>Reporter: hongbin ma
>Assignee: hongbin ma
>Priority: Major
>
> complex cases like 
> timestampadd(MONTH,23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) or 
> timestampadd(MONTH,-23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) is not covered. 
>  
> And my tests shows this kind of queries will fail IT. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KYLIN-3379) timestampadd test coverage is not enough

2018-05-12 Thread hongbin ma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

hongbin ma updated KYLIN-3379:
--
Description: 
complex cases like 

timestampadd(MONTH,23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) or 

timestampadd(MONTH,-23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) is not covered. 

 

And my tests shows this kind of queries will fail IT. 

> timestampadd test coverage is not enough
> 
>
> Key: KYLIN-3379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379
> Project: Kylin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: v2.3.1
>Reporter: hongbin ma
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: v2.4.0
>
>
> complex cases like 
> timestampadd(MONTH,23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) or 
> timestampadd(MONTH,-23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) is not covered. 
>  
> And my tests shows this kind of queries will fail IT. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (KYLIN-3379) timestampadd test coverage is not enough

2018-05-12 Thread hongbin ma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

hongbin ma updated KYLIN-3379:
--
Fix Version/s: v2.4.0

> timestampadd test coverage is not enough
> 
>
> Key: KYLIN-3379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3379
> Project: Kylin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: v2.3.1
>Reporter: hongbin ma
>Assignee: hongbin ma
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: v2.4.0
>
>
> complex cases like 
> timestampadd(MONTH,23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) or 
> timestampadd(MONTH,-23,test_kylin_fact.cal_dt) is not covered. 
>  
> And my tests shows this kind of queries will fail IT. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)