madrob commented on PR #989: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/989#issuecomment-1168939508
Both the old index in d64900e and the regenerated index in f158be9 came off of branch_8_11, and more specifically the 8.11.2 release tag. I don't understand why they are different though. Old index was generated using commands in the release wizard and copied over from the commit in 963814fc454, regenerated index was built by running directly running `ant`, then zipped. The error that we get with the "bad" index can be reproduced on `d64900e` with `./gradlew test --tests TestBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndex` ``` org.apache.lucene.backward_index.TestBackwardsCompatibility > testSortedIndex FAILED java.lang.AssertionError at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([80EE95A3F6D9343B:F771F355CE204DEF]:0) at junit@4.13.1/org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:87) at junit@4.13.1/org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:42) at junit@4.13.1/org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.backward_index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.searchExampleIndex(TestBackwardsCompatibility.java:2179) at org.apache.lucene.backward_index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndex(TestBackwardsCompatibility.java:2148) ``` The test code in question is these lines: ``` topDocs = searcher.search(new TermQuery(new Term("body", "the")), 5); assertTrue(topDocs.totalHits.value > 0); ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org