[GitHub] [lucene] msokolov commented on pull request #913: Lucene 10577
msokolov commented on PR #913: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/913#issuecomment-1133979777 I ran luceneutil (after adding support for this new encoding, and scaling the vectors used on the build the candidate index and queries) and got decent results: Task QPS | baseline | StdDev | candidate | StdDev | Pct diff | p-value --- | ---: | --- | -: | --- | --- | - : PKLookup | 133.47 | (18.7%) | 130.73 | (24.6%) | -2.0% ( -38% - 50%) | 0.767 LowTermVector | 1024.29 | (15.6%) |1140.88 | (16.3%) | 11.4% ( -17% - 51%) | 0.024 MedTermVector | 727.57 | (8.6%)| 850.54 | (14.0%) | 16.9% ( -5% - 43%) | 0.000 AndHighMedVector | 934.28 |(8.9%) |1105.48 | (15.0%) | 18.3% ( -5% - 46%) | 0.000 AndHighHighVector| 789.04 | (11.1%) | 947.74 | (16.1%) | 20.1% ( -6% - 53%) | 0.000 AndHighLowVector | 910.39 | (13.2%) |1219.95 | (22.2%) | 34.0% ( -1% - 79%) | 0.000 HighTermVector | 674.78 |(8.8%) | 915.99 | (17.9%) | 35.7% ( 8% - 68%) | 0.000 I have no explanation for the drop in PKLookup -- I checked the two indexes and they have the same named files, all the same sizes except for the .vec and .vem files, as expected. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
[GitHub] [lucene] msokolov commented on pull request #913: Lucene 10577
msokolov commented on PR #913: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/913#issuecomment-1133605270 > It's not a part of the mandatory test suite but you can run it headlessly with a virtual display (if you are on Linux). Please see: Thanks, I guess it runs as part of `check` tasks? Anyway after installing xvfb I get a pass; thanks. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
[GitHub] [lucene] msokolov commented on pull request #913: Lucene 10577
msokolov commented on PR #913: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/913#issuecomment-1133402474 hm this "luke-can-be-launched" test failed for me locally too. I guess it needs a JVM with a head? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
