[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 I actually think in the future this should be a stellar project / feature, then integrated after with metron. So that any ui can do stellar blockly ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 We should close this until we are ready for a feature branch ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 I don't think anything has been done with this. The feature branch wasn't made ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 What's the state of this? ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user lvets commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 I can help out with testing wherever possible. This is a very cool feature... ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 I would be happy to help, I think I have a decent handle with the stellar side, and could get up to speed on the ui stuff with your help. Think about how we can go about it. I think I would need to understand better how this works, what tightly coupled means etc. Maybe we can slice this up between ui and backend? ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 Sorry for ignoring this for so long. This is going to be a fairly complex module to maintain and it is VERY tightly coupled with Stellar. This means that if we want to officially add this feature it will place an additional and substantial burden on people making changes to Stellar. I am happy to lead this but it should be something that is overwhelmingly supported by the community. It will take a lot of effort from multiple people to make this comprehensive and robust. I would need volunteers to help me. Might make sense to revive this once we are confident Stellar is very stable and won't change much. Not sure if that will ever happen since it's so flexible and has already evolved so much :) ---
[GitHub] metron issue #684: DO NOT MERGE: METRON-1086: Create a Blockly-based user in...
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/684 I will repeat that this should be a feature branch. What are we going to do here? This is just sitting here getting more and more out of date. ---
