[GitHub] nifi issue #2201: NIFI-4367 Fix on processor for permit deriving script clas...
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2201 @mattyb149 I think that the test error is unrelated. I run the failing test locally and it passes. Do you have further comments for this PR? ---
[GitHub] nifi issue #2201: NIFI-4367 Fix on processor for permit deriving script clas...
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2201 kindly ping @frett27 ---
[GitHub] nifi issue #2201: NIFI-4367 Fix on processor for permit deriving script clas...
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2201 @frett27 I did some more checks and it seems to work. Are you ok if I send a PR on your branch to improve the UT? Or can you please update this PR according to the comments (and in order to make it passing the tests)? Thanks. ---
[GitHub] nifi issue #2201: NIFI-4367 Fix on processor for permit deriving script clas...
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2201 @frett27 I tried your fix, but if you add custom properties to the scripted processor, then it results as invalid with the message: ``` ... is not a supported property. ``` Thus a more complete UT might help discovering all the problems and solve all of them, because this fix at the moment seems not to be enough to make `InvokeScriptedProcessor` working with `AbstractProcessor`. ---