[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16124466#comment-16124466
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-4142:
---

Commit 451f9cf12407c4f7abeb8e538e3f55ecbf40abab in nifi's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~markap14]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=451f9cf ]

NIFI-4142: This closes #2015. Refactored Record Reader/Writer to allow for 
reading/writing "raw records". Implemented ValidateRecord. Updated Record 
Reader to take two parameters for nextRecord: (boolean coerceTypes) and 
(boolean dropUnknownFields)

Signed-off-by: joewitt 


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16124467#comment-16124467
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16124461#comment-16124461
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015
  
went ahead and fixed the typo and squashed locally.

Ran a test flow that created csv of various conformity to a simple spec.  
Ran it through various configratuions of the validator and it behaved as 
desired and expected in each case.  When data was marked invalid was able to 
see precisely why through the provenance events which was great.  Was able to 
see coercion/non-coercion behavior and all checks out.

+1 merging to master


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16124100#comment-16124100
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r132786485
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ValidateRecord.java
 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,457 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.nifi.processors.standard;
+
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.io.InputStream;
+import java.io.OutputStream;
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.Set;
+
+import org.apache.avro.Schema;
+import org.apache.avro.Schema.Parser;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.EventDriven;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.InputRequirement;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.InputRequirement.Requirement;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.SideEffectFree;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.SupportsBatching;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.CapabilityDescription;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.Tags;
+import org.apache.nifi.avro.AvroSchemaValidator;
+import org.apache.nifi.avro.AvroTypeUtil;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.AllowableValue;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.ValidationContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.ValidationResult;
+import org.apache.nifi.flowfile.FlowFile;
+import org.apache.nifi.flowfile.attributes.CoreAttributes;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessSession;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.Relationship;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.exception.ProcessException;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.StandardValidators;
+import org.apache.nifi.schema.access.SchemaField;
+import org.apache.nifi.schema.access.SchemaNotFoundException;
+import org.apache.nifi.schema.validation.SchemaValidationContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.schema.validation.StandardSchemaValidator;
+import org.apache.nifi.schemaregistry.services.SchemaRegistry;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.MalformedRecordException;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RecordReader;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RecordReaderFactory;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RecordSetWriter;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.RecordSetWriterFactory;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.WriteResult;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RawRecordWriter;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.Record;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RecordSchema;
+import 
org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.validation.RecordSchemaValidator;
+import 
org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.validation.SchemaValidationResult;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.validation.ValidationError;
+
+@EventDriven
+@SideEffectFree
+@SupportsBatching
+@InputRequirement(Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED)
+@Tags({"record", "schema", "validate"})
+@CapabilityDescription("Validates the Records of an incoming FlowFile 
against a given schema. All records that adhere to the schema are routed to the 
\"valid\" relationship while "
++ "records that do not adhere to hte schema are routed to the 
\"invalid\" relationship. It is therefore possible for a single incoming 
FlowFile to be split into two individual "
++ "FlowFiles if some records are valid according to the schema and 
others are not. Any FlowFile that is 

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16124094#comment-16124094
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015
  
@markap14  looks like the option says "Used Reader's Schema".  I'm assuming 
that is a typo and it should say "Use Reader's Schema".  But that is not in 
this PR it appears.  Did that sneak in elsewhere?


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-11 Thread Mark Payne (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16123885#comment-16123885
 ] 

Mark Payne commented on NIFI-4142:
--

[~joewitt] rebased and squashed. Thanks!

> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-08-10 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16122660#comment-16122660
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015
  
@markap14 can you please rebase and resolve conflict and please go ahead 
and squash.


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-21 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16096635#comment-16096635
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user markap14 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015
  
@joewitt I've pushed a new commit that I believe better clarifies how 
schemas are treated in terms of strictness vs. leniency by providing two 
arguments instead of 'enforceSchema': 'coerceTypes' and 'dropUnknownFields'



> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-21 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16096461#comment-16096461
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r128806560
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/RecordReader.java
 ---
@@ -38,14 +38,35 @@
 public interface RecordReader extends Closeable {
 
 /**
- * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
+ * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available. Schema enforcement will be enabled.
  *
  * @return the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
  *
  * @throws IOException if unable to read from the underlying data
  * @throws MalformedRecordException if an unrecoverable failure occurs 
when trying to parse a record
+ * @throws SchemaValidationException if a Record contains a field that 
violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the appropriate field type.
  */
-Record nextRecord() throws IOException, MalformedRecordException;
+default Record nextRecord() throws IOException, 
MalformedRecordException {
+return nextRecord(true);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reads the next record from the underlying stream. If schema 
enforcement is enabled, then any field in the Record whose type does not
+ * match the schema will be coerced to the correct type and a 
MalformedRecordException will be thrown if unable to coerce the data into
+ * the correct type. If schema enforcement is disabled, then no type 
coercion will occur. As a result, calling
+ * {@link 
Record#getValue(org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RecordField)}
+ * may return any type of Object, such as a String or another Record, 
even though the schema indicates that the field must be an integer.
+ *
+ * @param enforceSchema whether or not fields in the Record should be 
validated against the schema and coerced when necessary
+ *
+ * @return the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available
+ * @throws IOException if unable to read from the underlying data
+ * @throws MalformedRecordException if an unrecoverable failure occurs 
when trying to parse a record, or a Record contains a field
+ * that violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the 
appropriate field type.
+ * @throws SchemaValidationException if a Record contains a field that 
violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the appropriate
+ * field type and schema enforcement is enabled
+ */
+Record nextRecord(boolean enforceSchema) throws IOException, 
MalformedRecordException;
--- End diff --

I think I actually want to just separate the concept out into two different 
variables here: boolean coerceTypes, boolean dropUnknownRecords. That way it is 
very explicit what is happening, and I don't think that 'strict' vs. 'lenient' 
really conveys those two semantics as well as I'd like.


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-21 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16096270#comment-16096270
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r128764060
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/SchemaValidationException.java
 ---
@@ -15,14 +15,16 @@
  * limitations under the License.
  */
 
-package org.apache.nifi.serialization.record;
+package org.apache.nifi.serialization;
 
-public class TypeMismatchException extends RuntimeException {
--- End diff --

I don't agree that they are pretty much the same thing. 
TypeMismatchException is very specific. SchemaValidationException can be much 
more broad. For instance, if a required field is missing, that is not a Type 
Mismatch, but it is a Schema Validation.


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16089956#comment-16089956
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r127738912
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/RecordReader.java
 ---
@@ -38,14 +38,35 @@
 public interface RecordReader extends Closeable {
 
 /**
- * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
+ * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available. Schema enforcement will be enabled.
  *
  * @return the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
  *
  * @throws IOException if unable to read from the underlying data
  * @throws MalformedRecordException if an unrecoverable failure occurs 
when trying to parse a record
+ * @throws SchemaValidationException if a Record contains a field that 
violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the appropriate field type.
  */
-Record nextRecord() throws IOException, MalformedRecordException;
+default Record nextRecord() throws IOException, 
MalformedRecordException {
--- End diff --

we should indicate whether the scheme enforcement strictness is 'lenient' 
or 'strict'.


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16089955#comment-16089955
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r127738787
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/RecordReader.java
 ---
@@ -38,14 +38,35 @@
 public interface RecordReader extends Closeable {
 
 /**
- * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
+ * Returns the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available. Schema enforcement will be enabled.
  *
  * @return the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available.
  *
  * @throws IOException if unable to read from the underlying data
  * @throws MalformedRecordException if an unrecoverable failure occurs 
when trying to parse a record
+ * @throws SchemaValidationException if a Record contains a field that 
violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the appropriate field type.
  */
-Record nextRecord() throws IOException, MalformedRecordException;
+default Record nextRecord() throws IOException, 
MalformedRecordException {
+return nextRecord(true);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reads the next record from the underlying stream. If schema 
enforcement is enabled, then any field in the Record whose type does not
+ * match the schema will be coerced to the correct type and a 
MalformedRecordException will be thrown if unable to coerce the data into
+ * the correct type. If schema enforcement is disabled, then no type 
coercion will occur. As a result, calling
+ * {@link 
Record#getValue(org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.RecordField)}
+ * may return any type of Object, such as a String or another Record, 
even though the schema indicates that the field must be an integer.
+ *
+ * @param enforceSchema whether or not fields in the Record should be 
validated against the schema and coerced when necessary
+ *
+ * @return the next record in the stream or null if no 
more records are available
+ * @throws IOException if unable to read from the underlying data
+ * @throws MalformedRecordException if an unrecoverable failure occurs 
when trying to parse a record, or a Record contains a field
+ * that violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the 
appropriate field type.
+ * @throws SchemaValidationException if a Record contains a field that 
violates the schema and cannot be coerced into the appropriate
+ * field type and schema enforcement is enabled
+ */
+Record nextRecord(boolean enforceSchema) throws IOException, 
MalformedRecordException;
--- End diff --

the schema had always been enforced arguably just with sense of leniency.  
I think this method parameter should be 'strictSchemaEnforcement' or 
'enforceStrictSchema'.


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16089954#comment-16089954
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

Github user joewitt commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015#discussion_r127738279
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/SchemaValidationException.java
 ---
@@ -15,14 +15,16 @@
  * limitations under the License.
  */
 
-package org.apache.nifi.serialization.record;
+package org.apache.nifi.serialization;
 
-public class TypeMismatchException extends RuntimeException {
--- End diff --

i dont think it is ok to change this exeception class name at this juncture 
and even if it is questionable ok the juice is probably not worth the squeeze.  
TypeMismatch and SchemaValidation are pretty much the same thing


> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4142) Implement a ValidateRecord Processor

2017-07-17 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16089908#comment-16089908
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4142:
--

GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015

NIFI-4142: Refactored Record Reader/Writer to allow for reading/writi…

…ng "raw records". Implemented ValidateRecord.

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

### For all changes:
- [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
 in the commit message?

- [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI- where  is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

- [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?

- [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

### For code changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
- [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?

### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/markap14/nifi NIFI-4142

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2015.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2015


commit ad5c46fe7646103021556178726254f2cbb0b8a0
Author: Mark Payne 
Date:   2017-06-30T12:32:01Z

NIFI-4142: Refactored Record Reader/Writer to allow for reading/writing 
"raw records". Implemented ValidateRecord.




> Implement a ValidateRecord Processor
> 
>
> Key: NIFI-4142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4142
> Project: Apache NiFi
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Mark Payne
>Assignee: Mark Payne
>
> We need a processor that is capable of validating that all Records in a 
> FlowFile adhere to the proper schema.
> The Processor should be configured with a Record Reader and should route each 
> record to either 'valid' or 'invalid' based on whether or not the record 
> adheres to the reader's schema. A record would be invalid in any of the 
> following cases:
> - Missing field that is required according to the schema
> - Extra field that is not present in schema (it should be configurable 
> whether or not this is a failure)
> - Field requires coercion and strict type checking enabled (this should also 
> be configurable)
> - Field is invalid, such as the value "hello" when it should be an integer



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)