Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1977853582 > @QWQyyy First, IIRC, the timeout of the Kubernetes client in the above log is related to the pod creation. It's not related to the execution of an activation. The action timeout controls the execution timeout against the pod(container). > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/5529cc49d31f135dfdac4f2a2072ca46bfd754de/core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala#L834 > > I think you need to ensure you can invoke your action successfully with the `wsk action invoke` command. If you can successfully invoke your action without the API gateway, then the culprit is the API gateway. If your action is invoked well but it is changed to the asynchronous(get 202 response) at some point, it's related to the controller configuration. If you can't even invoke your activation in the asynchronous mode as well, you may not configure the action timeout properly. It is true that I can successfully access my functions using wsk, but it is only limited to functions within 60 seconds. For functions that take longer to execute, the wsk client also returns an Oops--504 error, but I found through the resource manager htop that the function code is still During execution, after the function is executed, you can see from `wsk activation` that the function ends correctly. This confuses me. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1976595625 > @QWQyyy First, IIRC, the timeout of the Kubernetes client in the above log is related to the pod creation. It's not related to the execution of an activation. The action timeout controls the execution timeout against the pod(container). > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/5529cc49d31f135dfdac4f2a2072ca46bfd754de/core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala#L834 > > I think you need to ensure you can invoke your action successfully with the `wsk action invoke` command. If you can successfully invoke your action without the API gateway, then the culprit is the API gateway. If your action is invoked well but it is changed to the asynchronous(get 202 response) at some point, it's related to the controller configuration. If you can't even invoke your activation in the asynchronous mode as well, you may not configure the action timeout properly. Okay let's try it! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1975057329 @QWQyyy First, IIRC, the timeout of the Kubernetes client in the above log is related to the pod creation. It's not related to the execution of an activation. The action timeout controls the execution timeout against the pod(container). https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/5529cc49d31f135dfdac4f2a2072ca46bfd754de/core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/containerpool/ContainerProxy.scala#L834 I think you need to ensure you can invoke your action successfully with the `wsk action invoke` command. If you can successfully invoke your action without the API gateway, then the culprit is the API gateway. If your action is invoked well but it is changed to the asynchronous(get 202 response) at some point, it's related to the controller configuration. If you can't even invoke your activation in the asynchronous mode as well, you may not configure the action timeout properly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971459663 I am currently studying the source code of openwhisk in depth, and I hope to make some solid changes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971458602  At the same time, how should I correctly configure the execution time limit? What I wrote in value.yaml is 500 minutes, but when I use wsk to set the upper limit of execution time of 500 minutes, the invoker log prints 600s? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971426488 It seems that I should also pay attention to apigateway:  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971422798  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971401734 wsk does work, but only the information recorded by the activation can be viewed. We prefer to complete our services directly through the gateway HTTP request. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1971399754 > You are supposed to be able to invoke the action with `wsk`. I think that's the starting point to look into. I'm sure that my gateway can correctly ensure that the end-to-end response is greater than 60 seconds. I have also explicitly configured the controller. I can't seem to find any more places where I need to configure the timeout. Can you give me some suggestions? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1970623418 You are supposed to be able to invoke the action with `wsk`. I think that's the starting point to look into. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1970536490 > It seems you are using the API gateway, could you check again without the API gateway first?  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1970432772 It seems you are using the API gateway, could you check again without the API gateway first? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] How to correctly modify OpenWhisk’s gateway blocking limit from source code (currently 60s) [openwhisk]
QWQyyy commented on issue #5467: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5467#issuecomment-1970417662 @style95 Could you please give me some guidance? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
