[GitHub] markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9
markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9 URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3607#issuecomment-388269801 Good one @dgrove-oss! Didn't think about all the other stuff in a docker image. I think its illusionary to have a docker image with no GPL software in it, so why bother about the JDK specifically? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9
markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9 URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3607#issuecomment-387111792 As for docker images: There's no official image for Kafka and the "official" image for Zookeeper is not part of the Apache project. https://github.com/31z4/zookeeper-docker This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9
markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9 URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3607#issuecomment-387110236 Does the tool with which binaries are created matter when it comes to the license of the binary (given that the tool's license doesn't prohibit anything like that). From a dependency PoV, even a binary release like Kafka's is only dependent on some JRE + other binary deps. That shouldn't affect the product's license at all. The only "binary" where we'd bundle a specific JRE/JDK is our docker images. Are those officially part of the release @mrutkows? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9
markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9 URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3607#issuecomment-386514512 @mrutkows in which way do we package JVM/JDK libraries? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9
markusthoemmes commented on issue #3607: Change the JDK to use openjdk8-openj9 URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3607#issuecomment-386440722 Is this also an issue if the mentioned alternative JDKs are not part of our release? We're moving to use a prebuilt docker image of OpenJDK. I'm wondering if this paragraph specifically applies here: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#platform This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
