[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-26 Thread Lars Hofhansl (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17352003#comment-17352003
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-6437:


I cherry-picked it into branch-5.1.

> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.17.0, 5.2.0, 5.1.2, 4.16.2
>
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-26 Thread Lars Hofhansl (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17351994#comment-17351994
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-6437:


What about 5.1?

Since it's in 4.16.2 it should be in 5.1.2 as well, right?

> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.17.0, 5.2.0, 4.16.2
>
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-04 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338964#comment-17338964
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

stoty commented on pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#issuecomment-831917190


   :broken_heart: **-1 overall**
   
   
   
   
   
   
   | Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
   |::|--:|:|:|
   | +0 :ok: |  reexec  |   1m 36s |  Docker mode activated.  |
   ||| _ Prechecks _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  dupname  |   0m  0s |  No case conflicting files 
found.  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  hbaseanti  |   0m  0s |  Patch does not have any 
anti-patterns.  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  @author  |   0m  0s |  The patch does not contain any 
@author tags.  |
   | -1 :x: |  test4tests  |   0m  0s |  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.  
|
   ||| _ 4.16 Compile Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvninstall  |  15m 24s |  4.16 passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   1m  9s |  4.16 passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  checkstyle  |   0m 30s |  4.16 passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 49s |  4.16 passed  |
   | +0 :ok: |  spotbugs  |   3m 23s |  phoenix-core in 4.16 has 945 extant 
spotbugs warnings.  |
   ||| _ Patch Compile Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  mvninstall  |   6m 50s |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  compile  |   1m 10s |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javac  |   1m 10s |  the patch passed  |
   | -1 :x: |  checkstyle  |   0m 31s |  phoenix-core: The patch generated 6 
new + 8 unchanged - 0 fixed = 14 total (was 8)  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  whitespace  |   0m  0s |  The patch has no whitespace 
issues.  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  javadoc  |   0m 51s |  the patch passed  |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  spotbugs  |   3m 40s |  the patch passed  |
   ||| _ Other Tests _ |
   | +1 :green_heart: |  unit  | 199m 44s |  phoenix-core in the patch passed.  
|
   | +1 :green_heart: |  asflicense  |   0m 10s |  The patch does not generate 
ASF License warnings.  |
   |  |   | 236m 36s |   |
   
   
   | Subsystem | Report/Notes |
   |--:|:-|
   | Docker | ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-1219/2/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
 |
   | GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219 |
   | JIRA Issue | PHOENIX-6437 |
   | Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs hbaseanti 
checkstyle compile |
   | uname | Linux b2b42220db37 4.15.0-101-generic #102-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 11 
10:07:26 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
   | Build tool | maven |
   | Personality | dev/phoenix-personality.sh |
   | git revision | 4.16 / e3c8ac0 |
   | Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_242-8u242-b08-0ubuntu3~16.04-b08 |
   | checkstyle | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-1219/2/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/diff-checkstyle-phoenix-core.txt
 |
   |  Test Results | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-1219/2/testReport/
 |
   | Max. process+thread count | 4919 (vs. ulimit of 3) |
   | modules | C: phoenix-core U: phoenix-core |
   | Console output | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-1219/2/console
 |
   | versions | git=2.7.4 maven=3.3.9 spotbugs=4.1.3 |
   | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
   
   
   This message was automatically generated.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338707#comment-17338707
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 commented on a change in pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#discussion_r625452537



##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilterIT.java
##
@@ -281,4 +347,68 @@ private int getAndAssertTenantCountInEdit(WAL.Entry entry) 
{
 }
 return entry;
   }
+
+  public WAL.Entry getEntry(TableName tableName, Scan scan, boolean 
addIndexedKeyValueCell)

Review comment:
   Updated in latest commit.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338705#comment-17338705
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 commented on a change in pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#discussion_r625451166



##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##
@@ -103,18 +104,20 @@ private boolean isTenantRowCellSystemChildLink(final Cell 
cell) {
 if (!isTenantRowCell) {
   boolean isChildLink = CellUtil.matchingQualifier(
 cell, PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.LINK_TYPE_BYTES);
-  if (isChildLink) {
-if (CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) {
+  // Check if cell is of type LINK_TYPE with value 4 or DeleteFamily
+  if ((isChildLink && CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) ||
+  CellUtil.isDeleteFamily(cell) ) {

Review comment:
   To replicate a delete marker we are using two checks.
   1. The cell is of type `DeleteFamily`.
   2. The length for `COLUMN_NAME` is greater than `0`. (For tenant views 
column_name is populated with tenant_id which is not the case for global views.)
   
   One may argue that the above two checks are also true for delete markers of 
column rows and we may over-replicate those rows. But, we are avoiding all 
those scenarios by doing the above filtering only for the mutations belonging 
to `SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table. With 4.15+ we are assured that 
`SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table only stores parent-child linking rows with 
`LINK_TYPE=4`, so the only thing we need to differentiate here is parent-child 
link delete markers for tenant vs non-tenant view. Let me know if you still 
feel we are missing any scenario. Thanks




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338704#comment-17338704
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 commented on a change in pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#discussion_r625451166



##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##
@@ -103,18 +104,20 @@ private boolean isTenantRowCellSystemChildLink(final Cell 
cell) {
 if (!isTenantRowCell) {
   boolean isChildLink = CellUtil.matchingQualifier(
 cell, PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.LINK_TYPE_BYTES);
-  if (isChildLink) {
-if (CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) {
+  // Check if cell is of type LINK_TYPE with value 4 or DeleteFamily
+  if ((isChildLink && CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) ||
+  CellUtil.isDeleteFamily(cell) ) {

Review comment:
   To replicate a delete marker we are using two checks.
   1. The cell is of type `DeleteFamily`.
   2. The length for `COLUMN_NAME` is greater than `0`. (For tenant views 
column_name is populated with tenant_id which is not the case for global views.)
   
   One may argue that the above two checks are also true for delete markers of 
column rows and we may over-replicate those rows. But, we are avoiding all 
those scenarios by doing the above filtering only for the mutations belonging 
to `SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table. With 4.15+ we are assured that 
`SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table only stores parent-child linking rows with 
`LINK_TYPE=4`. Let me know if you still feel we are missing any scenario. Thanks




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338703#comment-17338703
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 commented on a change in pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#discussion_r625451166



##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##
@@ -103,18 +104,20 @@ private boolean isTenantRowCellSystemChildLink(final Cell 
cell) {
 if (!isTenantRowCell) {
   boolean isChildLink = CellUtil.matchingQualifier(
 cell, PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.LINK_TYPE_BYTES);
-  if (isChildLink) {
-if (CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) {
+  // Check if cell is of type LINK_TYPE with value 4 or DeleteFamily
+  if ((isChildLink && CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) ||
+  CellUtil.isDeleteFamily(cell) ) {

Review comment:
   To replicate a delete marker we are using two checks.
   1. The cell is of type `DeleteFamily`.
   2. The length for `COLUMN_NAME` is greater than `0`. (For tenant views 
column_name is populated with tenant_id which is not the case for global views.)
   
   One may argue that the above two checks are also true for delete markers of 
column rows and we may over-replicate that as well. But, we are avoiding all 
those scenarios by doing the above filtering only for the mutations belonging 
to `SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table. With 4.15+ we are assured that 
`SYSTEM.CHILD_LINK` table only stores parent-child linking rows with 
`LINK_TYPE=4`. Let me know if you still feel we are missing any scenario. Thanks




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338701#comment-17338701
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

xcangCRM commented on a change in pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#discussion_r625448015



##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilterIT.java
##
@@ -281,4 +347,68 @@ private int getAndAssertTenantCountInEdit(WAL.Entry entry) 
{
 }
 return entry;
   }
+
+  public WAL.Entry getEntry(TableName tableName, Scan scan, boolean 
addIndexedKeyValueCell)

Review comment:
   Does this have to be public? 

##
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##
@@ -103,18 +104,20 @@ private boolean isTenantRowCellSystemChildLink(final Cell 
cell) {
 if (!isTenantRowCell) {
   boolean isChildLink = CellUtil.matchingQualifier(
 cell, PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.LINK_TYPE_BYTES);
-  if (isChildLink) {
-if (CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) {
+  // Check if cell is of type LINK_TYPE with value 4 or DeleteFamily
+  if ((isChildLink && CellUtil.matchingValue(cell, CHILD_TABLE_BYTES)) ||
+  CellUtil.isDeleteFamily(cell) ) {

Review comment:
   this logic means you will replicate whenever it's a DeleteFamily cell, 
regardless of childlink or not. Is this the intention? 




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338689#comment-17338689
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 commented on pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219#issuecomment-831606695


   With this PR we are fixing the bug where delete markers for parent-child 
link rows do not get replicated via SystemCatalogWalEntry Filter for tenant 
views. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-6437) Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter

2021-05-03 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338686#comment-17338686
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6437:
-

ankitjain64 opened a new pull request #1219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1219


   …stemCatalogWALEntryFilter


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Delete marker for parent-child rows does not get replicated via 
> SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter
> ---
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6437
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Ankit Jain
>Assignee: Ankit Jain
>Priority: Major
>
> As part of PHOENIX-3639  SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter was introduced to 
> replicate tenant owned rows from system.catalog and ignore the non-tenant 
> rows. During recent testing it was realized that delete markers for 
> parent-child rows does not get replicated. As part of this Jira we want to 
> fix that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)