[jira] [Assigned] (SPARK-11184) Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental

2015-10-19 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-11184:


Assignee: Apache Spark

> Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental
> 
>
> Key: SPARK-11184
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 1.5.1
>Reporter: Sean Owen
>Assignee: Apache Spark
>Priority: Minor
>
> Comments please [~mengxr] and [~josephkb]: my proposal is to remove most 
> {{@Experimental}} annotations from the {{.mllib}} code, on the theory that 
> it's not intended to change much more. 
> I can easily take a shot at this, but wanted to collect thoughts before I 
> started. Does the theory sound reasonable? Part of it is a desire to keep 
> this annotation meaningful, and also encourage people to at least view MLlib 
> as stable, because it is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Assigned] (SPARK-11184) Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental

2015-10-19 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-11184:


Assignee: (was: Apache Spark)

> Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental
> 
>
> Key: SPARK-11184
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 1.5.1
>Reporter: Sean Owen
>Priority: Minor
>
> Comments please [~mengxr] and [~josephkb]: my proposal is to remove most 
> {{@Experimental}} annotations from the {{.mllib}} code, on the theory that 
> it's not intended to change much more. 
> I can easily take a shot at this, but wanted to collect thoughts before I 
> started. Does the theory sound reasonable? Part of it is a desire to keep 
> this annotation meaningful, and also encourage people to at least view MLlib 
> as stable, because it is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org