[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-10-05 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15549494#comment-15549494
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


Thanks for the feedback, that's reasonable.

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
> Fix For: 2.0.1, 2.1.0
>
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-06 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15469092#comment-15469092
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

There is no noticable performance gain I observed comparing to BytesToBytesMap. 
Part of the reason might be due to the fact that BroadcastHashJoin was 
consuming very less percentage of the total job time. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
> Fix For: 2.0.1, 2.1.0
>
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-06 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15468364#comment-15468364
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


Is there any performance difference comparing to BytesToBytesMap?

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
> Fix For: 2.0.1, 2.1.0
>
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-06 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15468339#comment-15468339
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

[~davies] -  Thanks for looking into this. I tested the failing job with the 
fix and it works fine now. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
> Fix For: 2.0.1, 2.1.0
>
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-01 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456744#comment-15456744
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

Thanks for the fix [~davies]. I will test this change with our job to see if 
that fixes the issue. 

PS - I am away this week. Will get to it some time next week. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-01 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456605#comment-15456605
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


[~sitalke...@gmail.com] I think I found the cause and fix it, could you help to 
test it (also check the performance improvement comparing to BytesToBytesMap)?

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-09-01 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15456597#comment-15456597
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-16922:
--

User 'davies' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14927

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>Assignee: Davies Liu
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-18 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427429#comment-15427429
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

Kryo 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-18 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427264#comment-15427264
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


Which serializer are you using? java serializer or Kyro?

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-18 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427259#comment-15427259
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

>> Could you also try to disable the dense mode?

I tried disabling the dense mode, that did not help either. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-18 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427250#comment-15427250
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

The failure is deterministic, we are reproducing the issue for every run of the 
job (Its not only one job, there are multiple jobs that are failing because of 
this). For now, we have made a change to not use the  LongHashedRelation to 
workaround this issue. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-18 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427241#comment-15427241
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


Is this failure determistic or not? Happened on every task or some or them?

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-15 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421524#comment-15421524
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

Yes, I have the above mentioned PR as well. 

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-15 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421484#comment-15421484
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


Have you also have this one? https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14373

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-12 Thread Sital Kedia (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15419458#comment-15419458
 ] 

Sital Kedia commented on SPARK-16922:
-

I am using the fix in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14464/files, still 
the issue remains. The joining key lies in the range [43304915L to 
10150946266075397L]

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-12 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15419438#comment-15419438
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


I think it's fixed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14464/files

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-16922) Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0

2016-08-12 Thread Davies Liu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15419434#comment-15419434
 ] 

Davies Liu commented on SPARK-16922:


[~sitalke...@gmail.com] There are two integer overflow bugs fixed recently in 
LongHashedRelation, could you test with latest master? How is the range of your 
joining key?

> Query with Broadcast Hash join fails due to executor OOM in Spark 2.0
> -
>
> Key: SPARK-16922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16922
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Shuffle
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> A query which used to work in Spark 1.6 fails with executor OOM in 2.0.
> Stack trace - 
> {code}
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String.getBytes(UTF8String.java:229)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.hash$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$agg_VectorizedHashMap.findOrInsert(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
>   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
>   at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:85)
>   at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>   at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Query plan in Spark 1.6
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Final,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,field3#3])
> +- TungstenExchange hashpartitioning(field1#101,200), None
>+- TungstenAggregate(key=[field1#101], functions=[(sum((field2#74 / 
> 100.0)),mode=Partial,isDistinct=false)], output=[field1#101,sum#111])
>   +- Project [field1#101,field2#74]
>  +- BroadcastHashJoin [field5#63L], [cast(cast(field4#97 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], BuildRight
> :- ConvertToUnsafe
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field2#74,field5#63L], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, Some(a), [(ds#57 >= 2013-10-01),(ds#57 <= 2013-12-31)]
> +- ConvertToUnsafe
>+- HiveTableScan [field1#101,field4#97], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table2, Some(b)
> {code}
> Query plan in 2.0
> {code}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[sum((field2#133 / 100.0))])
> +- Exchange hashpartitioning(field1#160, 200)
>+- *HashAggregate(keys=[field1#160], functions=[partial_sum((field2#133 / 
> 100.0))])
>   +- *Project [field2#133, field1#160]
>  +- *BroadcastHashJoin [field5#122L], [cast(cast(field4#156 as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)], Inner, BuildRight
> :- *Filter isnotnull(field5#122L)
> :  +- HiveTableScan [field5#122L, field2#133], MetastoreRelation 
> foo, table1, a, [isnotnull(ds#116), (ds#116 >= 2013-10-01), (ds#116 <= 
> 2013-12-31)]
> +- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(cast(input[0, string, false] as 
> decimal(20,0)) as bigint)))
>+- *Filter isnotnull(field4#156)
>   +- HiveTableScan [field4#156, field1#160], 
> MetastoreRelation foo, table2, b
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org