[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-22905) Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation

2017-12-28 Thread zhengruifeng (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16306020#comment-16306020
 ] 

zhengruifeng commented on SPARK-22905:
--

[~WeichenXu123] I made a check and found that same issue exists in 
{{GaussianMixtureModel}}, otherwise looks fine.

> Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-22905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>Reporter: Weichen Xu
>Assignee: Weichen Xu
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Currently, in `ChiSqSelectorModel`, save:
> {code}
> spark.createDataFrame(dataArray).repartition(1).write...
> {code}
> The default partition number used by createDataFrame is "defaultParallelism",
> Current RoundRobinPartitioning won't guarantee the "repartition" generating 
> the same order result with local array. We need fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-22905) Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation

2017-12-28 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16306018#comment-16306018
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-22905:
--

User 'zhengruifeng' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20113

> Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-22905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>Reporter: Weichen Xu
>Assignee: Weichen Xu
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Currently, in `ChiSqSelectorModel`, save:
> {code}
> spark.createDataFrame(dataArray).repartition(1).write...
> {code}
> The default partition number used by createDataFrame is "defaultParallelism",
> Current RoundRobinPartitioning won't guarantee the "repartition" generating 
> the same order result with local array. We need fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-22905) Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation

2017-12-28 Thread Weichen Xu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305931#comment-16305931
 ] 

Weichen Xu commented on SPARK-22905:


[~podongfeng] Some of them only including one row to save so there's no bug, 
some case including row-number column and when reading it will sort to get 
stable order. But I am not sure I miss some cases, it will great if you help 
check.

> Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-22905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>Reporter: Weichen Xu
>Assignee: Weichen Xu
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Currently, in `ChiSqSelectorModel`, save:
> {code}
> spark.createDataFrame(dataArray).repartition(1).write...
> {code}
> The default partition number used by createDataFrame is "defaultParallelism",
> Current RoundRobinPartitioning won't guarantee the "repartition" generating 
> the same order result with local array. We need fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-22905) Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation

2017-12-28 Thread zhengruifeng (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305905#comment-16305905
 ] 

zhengruifeng commented on SPARK-22905:
--

Many other models are saved in the same way 
{sparkSession.createDataFrame(...).repartition(1).write.parquet}, are they 
needed to be fixed?

> Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-22905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: MLlib
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>Reporter: Weichen Xu
>Assignee: Weichen Xu
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Currently, in `ChiSqSelectorModel`, save:
> {code}
> spark.createDataFrame(dataArray).repartition(1).write...
> {code}
> The default partition number used by createDataFrame is "defaultParallelism",
> Current RoundRobinPartitioning won't guarantee the "repartition" generating 
> the same order result with local array. We need fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-22905) Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation

2017-12-26 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16304216#comment-16304216
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-22905:
--

User 'WeichenXu123' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20088

> Fix ChiSqSelectorModel save implementation
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-22905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22905
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ML, MLlib
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>Reporter: Weichen Xu
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Currently, in `ChiSqSelectorModel`, save:
> {code}
> spark.createDataFrame(dataArray).repartition(1).write...
> {code}
> The default partition number used by createDataFrame is "defaultParallelism",
> Current RoundRobinPartitioning won't guarantee the "repartition" generating 
> the same order result with local array. We need fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org