[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16512174#comment-16512174
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-24556:
--------------------------------------

User 'yucai' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21564

> ReusedExchange should rewrite output partitioning also when child's 
> partitioning is RangePartitioning
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-24556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24556
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.2
>            Reporter: yucai
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, ReusedExchange would rewrite output partitioning if child's 
> partitioning is HashPartitioning, but it does not do the same when child's 
> partitioning is RangePartitioning, sometimes, it could introduce extra 
> shuffle, see:
> {code:java}
> val df = Seq(1 -> "a", 3 -> "c", 2 -> "b").toDF("i", "j")
> val df1 = df.as("t1")
> val df2 = df.as("t2")
> val t = df1.orderBy("j").join(df2.orderBy("j"), $"t1.i" === $"t2.i", "right")
> t.cache.orderBy($"t2.j").explain
> {code}
> Before fix:
> {code:sql}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *(1) Sort [j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
> +- Exchange rangepartitioning(j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
>    +- InMemoryTableScan [i#5, j#6, i#13, j#14]
>          +- InMemoryRelation [i#5, j#6, i#13, j#14], CachedRDDBuilder...
>                +- *(2) BroadcastHashJoin [i#5], [i#13], RightOuter, BuildLeft
>                   :- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as...
>                   :  +- *(1) Sort [j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
>                   :     +- Exchange rangepartitioning(j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST, 
> 200)
>                   :        +- LocalTableScan [i#5, j#6]
>                   +- *(2) Sort [j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
>                      +- ReusedExchange [i#13, j#14], Exchange 
> rangepartitioning(j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
> {code}
> Better plan should avoid "Exchange rangepartitioning(j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST, 
> 200)", like:
> {code:sql}
> == Physical Plan ==
> *(1) Sort [j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
> +- InMemoryTableScan [i#5, j#6, i#13, j#14]
>       +- InMemoryRelation [i#5, j#6, i#13, j#14], CachedRDDBuilder...
>             +- *(2) BroadcastHashJoin [i#5], [i#13], RightOuter, BuildLeft
>                :- BroadcastExchange 
> HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
>                :  +- *(1) Sort [j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
>                :     +- Exchange rangepartitioning(j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
>                :        +- LocalTableScan [i#5, j#6]
>                +- *(2) Sort [j#14 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
>                   +- ReusedExchange [i#13, j#14], Exchange 
> rangepartitioning(j#6 ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to