[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-25840) `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dongjoon Hyun updated SPARK-25840: -- Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) 2.4.0 > `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary > > > Key: SPARK-25840 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Build >Affects Versions: 2.4.0 >Reporter: Dongjoon Hyun >Assignee: Dongjoon Hyun >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.4.0 > > > We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source* > materials needed to make changes to the software being released. > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts > From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain > own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them. > However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts > start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have > only the LICENSE file. > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz > dev/make-distribution.sh is used during the voting phase because we are > voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository. Individual > contributors usually don't have the downstream repository and starts to try > build the voting source artifacts to help the verification for the source > artifact during voting phase. (Personally, I did before.) > This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim > for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-25840) `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dongjoon Hyun updated SPARK-25840: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) > `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary > > > Key: SPARK-25840 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Build >Affects Versions: 3.0.0 >Reporter: Dongjoon Hyun >Assignee: Dongjoon Hyun >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.4.0 > > > We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source* > materials needed to make changes to the software being released. > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts > From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain > own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them. > However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts > start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have > only the LICENSE file. > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz > dev/make-distribution.sh is used during the voting phase because we are > voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository. Individual > contributors usually don't have the downstream repository and starts to try > build the voting source artifacts to help the verification for the source > artifact during voting phase. (Personally, I did before.) > This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim > for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-25840) `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dongjoon Hyun updated SPARK-25840: -- Description: We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source* materials needed to make changes to the software being released. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts >From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain >own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them. >However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts >start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have >only the LICENSE file. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz dev/make-distribution.sh is used during the voting phase because we are voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository. Individual contributors usually don't have the downstream repository and starts to try build the voting source artifacts to help the verification for the source artifact during voting phase. (Personally, I did before.) This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts. was: We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source* materials needed to make changes to the software being released. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts >From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain >own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them. >However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts >start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have >only the LICENSE file. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz `dev/make-distribution.sh` is used during the voting phase because we are voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository. This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts. > `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary > > > Key: SPARK-25840 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Build >Affects Versions: 3.0.0 >Reporter: Dongjoon Hyun >Priority: Major > > We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source* > materials needed to make changes to the software being released. > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts > From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain > own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them. > However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts > start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have > only the LICENSE file. > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz > dev/make-distribution.sh is used during the voting phase because we are > voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository. Individual > contributors usually don't have the downstream repository and starts to try > build the voting source artifacts to help the verification for the source > artifact during voting phase. (Personally, I did before.) > This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim > for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
