[jira] [Updated] (TEZ-1941) Memory provided by *Context.getAvailableMemory needs to be setup explicitly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated TEZ-1941: Attachment: TEZ-1941.2.txt The ExecutionContext is supposed to be shared by multiple tasks within a JVM. Maybe it needs a rename to be more clear. Updated the javadocs for ExecutionContext. Since that's per jvm - settting memory in it isn't an option, since it needs to be task specific. > Memory provided by *Context.getAvailableMemory needs to be setup explicitly > --- > > Key: TEZ-1941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1941 > Project: Apache Tez > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Siddharth Seth >Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Attachments: TEZ-1941.1.txt, TEZ-1941.2.txt > > > *Contexts.getAvailableMemory rely on Runtime..getMaxMemory(). This doesn't > work for memory scaling if multiple tasks are running within a JVM. > Container sizes (sent over RPC) can be used for setting up this value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (TEZ-1941) Memory provided by *Context.getAvailableMemory needs to be setup explicitly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated TEZ-1941: Attachment: TEZ-1941.1.txt Simple patch which moves the memory specifications over to main methods - instead of accessing Runtime.maxmemory from within context instances. Also fixes some findbugs-warnings in runtime-internals introduced by moving TezChild from tez-dag. Applies on top of TEZ-1879. [~hitesh] - please review. > Memory provided by *Context.getAvailableMemory needs to be setup explicitly > --- > > Key: TEZ-1941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1941 > Project: Apache Tez > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Siddharth Seth >Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Attachments: TEZ-1941.1.txt > > > *Contexts.getAvailableMemory rely on Runtime..getMaxMemory(). This doesn't > work for memory scaling if multiple tasks are running within a JVM. > Container sizes (sent over RPC) can be used for setting up this value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)