[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-10768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vihang Karajgaonkar resolved IMPALA-10768.
------------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: Impala 4.1
       Resolution: Fixed

> Deflake CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-10768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-10768
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Vihang Karajgaonkar
>            Assignee: Vihang Karajgaonkar
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Impala 4.1
>
>
> Some times we see CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest#testFileMetadataForPartitions 
> fail with following stack trace:
> {noformat}
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<090[1]01.txt> but was:<090[2]01.txt>
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:115)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:144)
>       at 
> org.apache.impala.catalog.metastore.CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest.assertFdsAreSame(CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest.java:133)
>       at 
> org.apache.impala.catalog.metastore.CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest.testFileMetadataForPartitions(CatalogHmsFileMetadataTest.java:121)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:386)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:323)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:143)
> {noformat}
> I was not able to reproduce the error locally but based on the code 
> inspection it looks like this happens because the order of the 
> filedescriptors in the two lists is different.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscr...@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-h...@impala.apache.org

Reply via email to