Re: "Open" Group port/Invocation dumps core
> > In both cases their biz model seems to get in the way of > efficiency. I am not going as far as Linus stating something > like "Java is Dead", but for my particular application Could you tell me where you saw this statment? Bye >
Re: JDK1.1.6 for Alpha-Linux?
Uncle George - Thanks for the info. We hope that you'll post info to this mailing list when you have a 116 that's worthwhile. Are the problems you're seeing with 116 (like SuperMojo not working) a porting problem, or a basic JDK 1.1.6 problem? And, out of curiosity, what is your involvement with Alpha-Linux and Java? In other words, what's your motivation for doing this port? Kind regards, Rich Uncle George wrote: > > I do, > > I do have a 116. But like most things the AWT doesn't work like the awt > from 115. > I have also tried the egcs ( alternate cc compiler for the alpha ). with > this compiler I can use byte/short machine instructions which should > speed up things. Interestingly enough though, the egcs compiled java116 > doesn't build ( at least ) one class. I dont get any errors, just dont > get the class. > > This also means that for folks with with 21064 processors would use one > binary, the folks with the 21164 processors can use the other. > > In either case, i havent really looked at it too much more when > SuperMojo ( which worked reasonably well under 115 ) doesn't work too > well yet under 116. > ALSO I still get requests to fix 115 ( i suppose they could just have > been requests to fix 116 :() > > Is there something more specifically u would to hear me talk about ? > gat > > Rich Edwards wrote: > > > Does anyone know of any efforts to port the JDK1.1.6 to Alpha-Linux? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rich Edwards > > Senior Software Engineer > > Codonics, Inc. > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rich Edwards Senior Software Engineer Codonics, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with finalize()
HrmmmI seem to recall posting something about Netbeans and the finalizer thread threadlock problem a while ago. If you are having problems with the finalizer, it is most likely a bug in sun's code. this might (well, it won't) solve your problem: $cat "Please fix the finalizer bug in the jdk." > blah $./mailsun where mailsun is: #!/bin/bash while [true] mail $[EMAIL PROTECTED] blah or similair (my bash prog'n skills are not so good) Leave for about three weeks, or untill someone comes knocking. Ok, I am just kidding :) On Thu, 27 Aug 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with jdk1.1.6v3a/glibc2. The problem is with > the finalize() methods which does not get invoked in my code. > Jdk1.1.5v7/glibc2 works fine (ie. the finalize() method is called). > Anyone got any idea why? > (I tried to create a small example which shows the problem > but finalize() get's called for the small example:( > > Marcel Ammerlaan > -- > "Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation" > yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation >
What?
Hello all, I've not seen this one yet, but forgive me if it's a FAQ. I'm running the jdk1.1.6v2 libc version which was appearing to work fine until I tried using javac, previously all code having been compiled under Symantecs JIT compiler on NT, I get the message 'No library path set' and nothing else. I've checked PATH and CLASSPATH, they're both fine and java works a treat. Any ideas? Nick Presently giving up smoking and carrying round a BAD head.
problems with finalize()
Hello, I have a problem with jdk1.1.6v3a/glibc2. The problem is with the finalize() methods which does not get invoked in my code. Jdk1.1.5v7/glibc2 works fine (ie. the finalize() method is called). Anyone got any idea why? (I tried to create a small example which shows the problem but finalize() get's called for the small example:( Marcel Ammerlaan -- "Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation
Someone to play with Linux javacomm
I have been playing around with the javacomm rxtx stuff implementing the event notification stuff as well as non blocking reads. Unfortunately I have a problem with the serial ports always blocking on reading despite the open options. Therefore I have implemented non blocking by using a separate thread the block on reading and update appropriate flags. I have also implemented many of the modem control line indication functions but not everything. However, you can run the BlackBox demonstration and the other examples that I have tested. I am currently looking for someone to play with what I have done, point out/fix any problems etc etc. The code is a bit messy at the moment and the java is probably not perfect as I am still learning. Any volunteers ? Cheers Dave Atkinson
Netbeans?
Hi, Has anybody tried to use netbeans in linux? It is a promising IDE, but with a slight problem : It hangs when you try to create a new class (for eg). Has anybody observed similar behavior? I am using jdk1.1.6v3a/glibc2. I have their second beta (I refer to netbeans). I wouldn't like to admit it, but it runs normally under nt (...) Any ideas are welcome! -- Dimitrios Vyzovitis Information Processing Laboratory Aristotle University of Thessaloniki [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://egnatia.ee.auth.gr/~dviz begin: vcard fn: Dimitrios Vyzovitis n: Vyzovitis;Dimitrios org:AUTH adr:142 V. Olgas Avenue;;;Thessaloniki;;54645;Greece email;internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work: ++30-31-996359 tel;home: ++30-31-817780 note: Orientation in space and time is the framework of cognition. x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard
final vs const
Hi, guys,
I have a question during my developing,
In Java it is very easy to assign different final value sto different
instances of an object, but when in C ++, it is difficult, especially
for an array. Like following,
class CPPCls
{
const int iarray[10];
...
}
How to initialize this const array within C++?
Thanks in advance.
Gao Lei.
