RE: Where can I find JAD?
Peter, Yes that is correct I did ask for a copy of JAD and the link on blackdown does not appear to be any good At present, I managed to poke a copy from an old backup 1.5.5.3 like you. Could someone please contact blackdown or the jad developer, this tool is by far one of the best or better Still make the source code available so that the tool can be used/updated. I like many others would hate To see such a good tool lost in time. Many thanks Matt -Original Message- From: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 1998 4:36 PM To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Where can I find JAD? I looked in the archive for this list and found that a Matt Zagni managed to find a copy of JAD. Unfortunately there are no indications of where. I currently have version 1.5.5.3. Is this the latest version? Where can I get the latest version? Many Thanks, and sorry for the re-post. Peter. -- As long as our expression of gratitude is genuine, other people love it and remember it. This not only makes them feel good, but it also encourages them to help us again and to encourage others to do the same. -Richard Carlson, Ph.D.
An IDE for C and JAVA
Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
Thanks. bye and Merry Xmas.
Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
Besides the EMACS+JDE environment there is an interesting
program that i find worth looking at. GRASP runs on various
unix platforms and Windows.
http://www.eng.auburn.edu/department/cse/research/grasp/
--
Von:Pierre Bizzotto[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Dezember 1998 10:36
An: linux java
Betreff:An IDE for C and JAVA
Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
Thanks. bye and Merry Xmas.
Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
>
>I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
>is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
>
>Thanks. bye and Merry Xmas.
X-Emacs ;-)))
Ciao,
Tobias
Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
I use Xemacs for a Java IDE.
S.u.S.e. has the Java Workshop 2.0
for $109 US.
Can't help with the keyboard. :(
Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>
> Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
>
> I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
> is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
>
> Thanks. bye and Merry Xmas.
--
What's in a name?
Applet vs Application
Hello, i am a newby to Java. So my question is, what are the functionaly differences between a java applet and application. What could be done in an Applet??? Are there any restrictions in Point Network, Filehandling etc.??? Could someone point me a sheet where to get a list of an full specification of an Applet??? Thanks for any advice! CU Dirk -- --- Dirk Schreiber\|/fax :+49 241 877743 Aachen/Germany (o o) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -ooO--(_)--Ooo-
Re: Applet vs Application
Dirk Schreiber wrote: > > Hello, > > i am a newby to Java. So my question is, what are the functionaly > differences between a java applet and application. What could be done in an > Applet??? Are there any restrictions in Point Network, Filehandling etc.??? > > Could someone point me a sheet where to get a list of an full specification > of an Applet??? I'd start at: http://java.sun.com/applets > > Thanks for any advice! > > CU Dirk > -- > --- > Dirk Schreiber\|/fax :+49 241 877743 > Aachen/Germany (o o) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -ooO--(_)--Ooo- GreetinX++, Ernst ... and merry Christmas to all! -- _ | "Come to me all you who are weary and burdened, and I | | will give you rest." | | | | -- Jesus Christ (Mt. 11:28) | |___ _| | Ernst de Haan | email [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Java programmer | web members.xoom.com/znerd/ | | Utrecht University| icq# 21871778 | |___|_|
JDK-1.1.7.1a Installation: missing libXm.so.2
I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of libXm.so.2 Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a libXm.so.1.2 (lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). So, where could I fin the libXm.so.2 ? The only one I founded is the Metrolink version, but it's a commercial version ! I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere... -- Jean-Michel Paris - Software Engineer SITA Group http://www.sita.int Internetworking Products & Services Program Bât Héraklion - 1041 Route des Dolines Sophia Antipolis 06560 VALBONNE - FRANCE Tel: +33-(0)4.92.96.64.95 Fax: +33-(O)4.92.96.64.91 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JDK-1.1.7.1a Installation: missing libXm.so.2
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:02:39 +0100, Jean-Michel Paris wrote: >I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: >jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. > >But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of >libXm.so.2 >Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a >libXm.so.1.2 >(lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). I don't know who built the JDK RPM, but the JDK does not need libXm.so.2 to run since it is statically linked with the MetroLink Motif 2.1 release. Now, when running the dynamic (DYN_JAVA=true) version, then it will need that library. You should be able to install the JDK just fine and run it in its normal configuration. (Note that if the RPM does not include the statically linked JDK you may wish to grab the tar archive which does include the fully release.) Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz
Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>
> Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
Use Emacs and JDE, it's best in the long run.
> I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
> is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
AltGr + (, AltGr + ) works for me.
--
Ugo Cei - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuori Orario Srl - Galleria Manzoni 15, 27100 Pavia - Italy
Tel: +39.382.22651, Fax: +39.382.539467
Re: Sun and Linux
This post was one of the best written and clearest pieces of information on Linux (including Linux on other than x86) and Java that I've ever seen, and it says quite a bit about Sun and Blackdown. IMHO, this should be sent out to the trade publications. Josh To answer your question: > > - Sun has licensed the 1.2 source under a special license to Steve Byrne > who in-turn sub-licenses the source to us allowing us to get access to the > 1.2 source early (in late October, early November) > > - Sun has provided 2 engineers that joined the Blackdown porting effort who > did alot of the initial 1.2 port to Linux and who have/will answer > techincal questions for us (a huge improvement over our previous situation!) > > - Sun has provided a JIT binary to Blackdown that works with x86 (the other > cpus must come up with something on their own, luckily the PPC has access > to Metrowerks JIT source) > > - Sun has provided Steve with the JCK so that we can finally tests the JDK > and make sure it passes all of Sun's tests > > - Sun (via the 2 engineers) will be able to incorpaorate our > patches/changes back into the source tree that will lighten the load of > future upgrades. > > - Sun has provided Steve with a Sparc machine with which to help the Sparc > port along. > > None of this was available under the previous non-commercial license. > > As far as I am concerned, I am very happy with Sun's support for Linux. My > biggest fear was that Sun would take over complete control of the JDK port > and only support the Sparc and x86 cpus leaving the PPC and Alpha out in > the cold. They did not do this which makes me very happy. The engineers > who have joined the team have ben very helpful answering questions and > without them, the PPC port of 1.2 would still be non-existant. > > Because of this, JDK 1.2 is running well on PPC right now (with admittedly > some bugs yet to iron out) which also makes me very happy. > > > I hope this clarifies things somewhat. > > Kevin > > Blackdown Porting Team (for PPC) > > > > > > > -- > Kevin B. Hendricks > Associate Professor, Operations & Information Technology > School of Business, College of William & Mary > Williamsburg, VA 23187, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://business.tyler.wm.edu > > > > - See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/java-linux/?start=5531
Re: Sun and Linux
This post was one of the best written and clearest pieces of information on Linux (including Linux on other than x86) and Java that I've ever seen, and it says quite a bit about Sun and Blackdown. IMHO, this should be sent out to the trade publications. Josh To answer your question: > > - Sun has licensed the 1.2 source under a special license to Steve Byrne > who in-turn sub-licenses the source to us allowing us to get access to the > 1.2 source early (in late October, early November) > > - Sun has provided 2 engineers that joined the Blackdown porting effort who > did alot of the initial 1.2 port to Linux and who have/will answer > techincal questions for us (a huge improvement over our previous situation!) > > - Sun has provided a JIT binary to Blackdown that works with x86 (the other > cpus must come up with something on their own, luckily the PPC has access > to Metrowerks JIT source) > > - Sun has provided Steve with the JCK so that we can finally tests the JDK > and make sure it passes all of Sun's tests > > - Sun (via the 2 engineers) will be able to incorpaorate our > patches/changes back into the source tree that will lighten the load of > future upgrades. > > - Sun has provided Steve with a Sparc machine with which to help the Sparc > port along. > > None of this was available under the previous non-commercial license. > > As far as I am concerned, I am very happy with Sun's support for Linux. My > biggest fear was that Sun would take over complete control of the JDK port > and only support the Sparc and x86 cpus leaving the PPC and Alpha out in > the cold. They did not do this which makes me very happy. The engineers > who have joined the team have ben very helpful answering questions and > without them, the PPC port of 1.2 would still be non-existant. > > Because of this, JDK 1.2 is running well on PPC right now (with admittedly > some bugs yet to iron out) which also makes me very happy. > > > I hope this clarifies things somewhat. > > Kevin > > Blackdown Porting Team (for PPC) > > > > > > > -- > Kevin B. Hendricks > Associate Professor, Operations & Information Technology > School of Business, College of William & Mary > Williamsburg, VA 23187, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://business.tyler.wm.edu > > > > - See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/java-linux/?start=5531
Re: Hitting walls with JDK1.1.7v1a native threads
I will say it is JVM problem if your app is pure java. You should not get SIGSEGV in your java code. Fox Nathan Meyers wrote: > The Java app I'm developing on Linux is failing when I try to run with > native threads. Before I spend a lot of time scratching my head over my > own code, I need to ask: > > The failure is a SIGSEGV (segmentation fault). Should this ever happen > as a result of my app's behavior? My inclination is to suspect the JVM. > The app runs beautifully with green threads. > > Nathan Meyers > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has inscribed me:
It has inscribed me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is In an aleatory program of " BOMBINGS ", you already know their address original is [EMAIL PROTECTED] is Tienene a program that he subscribes to many people in this address and in other but... It is a warning that I give you, he/she is a true mob > >I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: >jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. > >But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of >libXm.so.2 >Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a >libXm.so.1.2 >(lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). > >So, where could I fin the libXm.so.2 ? The only one I founded is the >Metrolink version, but >it's a commercial version ! > >I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere... > >-- >Jean-Michel Paris - Software Engineer >SITA Group http://www.sita.int >Internetworking Products & Services Program >B=E2t H=E9raklion - 1041 Route des Dolines >Sophia Antipolis >06560 VALBONNE - FRANCE >Tel: +33-(0)4.92.96.64.95 >Fax: +33-(O)4.92.96.64.91 >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Re: Sun and Linux
On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: > To answer your question: Thanks for finally clarifying this question. An ETA for JDK 1.2 would be nice tho :) Whoever the webmaster is, (s)he should put this up on the FAQ. -vinny -- Vincent Murphy | UCC CompSci Student | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (086) 8397405 NT = Not Today
It has inscribed me:
It has inscribed me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is In an aleatory program of " BOMBINGS ", you already know their address original is [EMAIL PROTECTED] is Tienene a program that he subscribes to many people in this address and in other but... It is a warning that I give you, he/she is a true mob I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of libXm.so.2 Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a libXm.so.1.2 (lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). So, where could I fin the libXm.so.2 ? The only one I founded is the Metrolink version, but it's a commercial version ! I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere... -- Jean-Michel Paris - Software Engineer SITA Group http://www.sita.int Internetworking Products & Services Program Bbt Hiraklion - 1041 Route des Dolines Sophia Antipolis 06560 VALBONNE - FRANCE Tel: +33-(0)4.92.96.64.95 Fax: +33-(O)4.92.96.64.91 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has inscribed me:
It has inscribed me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is In an aleatory program of " BOMBINGS ", you already know their address original is [EMAIL PROTECTED] is Tienene a program that he subscribes to many people in this address and in other but... It is a warning that I give you, he/she is a true mob >On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:02:39 +0100, Jean-Michel Paris wrote: > >>I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: >>jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. >> >>But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of >>libXm.so.2 >>Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a >>libXm.so.1.2 >>(lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). > >I don't know who built the JDK RPM, but the JDK does not need libXm.so.2 >to run since it is statically linked with the MetroLink Motif 2.1 release. > >Now, when running the dynamic (DYN_JAVA=true) version, then it will need >that library. > >You should be able to install the JDK just fine and run it in its normal >configuration. (Note that if the RPM does not include the statically >linked JDK you may wish to grab the tar archive which does include the >fully release.) > > >Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc. >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com >My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz > > >
It has inscribed me:
It has inscribed me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is In an aleatory program of " BOMBINGS ", you already know their address original is [EMAIL PROTECTED] is Tienene a program that he subscribes to many people in this address and in other but... It is a warning that I give you, he/she is a true mob > >On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:02:39 +0100, Jean-Michel Paris wrote: > >>I've downloaded the latest jdk on libc6 linux based system: >>jdk-1.1.7.1a-2glibc.i386.rpm. >> >>But when I tried to install it, I got the message that jdk has need of >>libXm.so.2 >>Ok, I went to the latest lestiff release, and I was only able to get a >>libXm.so.1.2 >>(lesstif is Motif-1.2 complient + stuff of 2.0). > >I don't know who built the JDK RPM, but the JDK does not need libXm.so.2 >to run since it is statically linked with the MetroLink Motif 2.1 release. > >Now, when running the dynamic (DYN_JAVA=true) version, then it will need >that library. > >You should be able to install the JDK just fine and run it in its normal >configuration. (Note that if the RPM does not include the statically >linked JDK you may wish to grab the tar archive which does include the >fully release.) > > >Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc. >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com >My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz > > >
RE: Sun and Linux
It looks like somebody took the advise of an earlier poster and put up a status for 1.2 on Blackdown's web site. Check out: http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html#jdk1.2 To summarize, less than a month from the time/date it was posted. I didn't see a date on the page, so I don't know when a "month from now" actually is. Enjoy. -Andy > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 3:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sun and Linux > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 1998, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: > > To answer your question: > > Thanks for finally clarifying this question. > > An ETA for JDK 1.2 would be nice tho :) > > Whoever the webmaster is, (s)he should put this up on the FAQ. > > -vinny > > -- > Vincent Murphy | UCC CompSci Student | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > (086) 8397405 >NT = Not Today > >
Re: Sun and Linux
Well... % telnet www.blackdown.org 80 Trying 204.180.15.12... Connected to www.blackdown.org. Escape character is '^]'. GET /java-linux/ports.html HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 20:57:37 GMT Server: Apache/1.3b3 Last-Modified: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:40:01 GMT [ ... snip ... ] So, if the last modification was adding the probable JDK 1.2 release date, "a month from now" should be mid-January. -Mario. "Harold G. Andrews II" wrote: > It looks like somebody took the advise of an earlier poster and put up a > status for 1.2 on Blackdown's web site. Check out: > > http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html#jdk1.2 > > To summarize, less than a month from the time/date it was posted. I didn't > see a date on the page, so I don't know when a "month from now" actually is. > Enjoy. > > -Andy
Re: has anyone got the native threads jdk1.1.7a1 running?
>> Moses DeJong writes:
>
>Moses> The CLASSPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are set so that the
>Moses> classes.zip file and the native libs are visible to the
>Moses> JVM.
>
>Invocation doesn't use the CLASSPATH variable in 1.1. You
>should set the classpath from within you C program:
>
>JavaVM* vm;
>JNIEnv* env;
>JDK1_1InitArgs vm_args;
>vm_args.version = 0x00010001;
>
>JNI_GetDefaultJavaVMInitArgs(&vm_args);
>vm_args.classpath = "java_home/lib/classes.zip:.";
>
>JNI_CreateJavaVM(&vm, &env, &vm_args);
>
>
>
>Juergen
>
>--
>Juergen Kreileder, Universitaet Dortmund, Lehrstuhl Informatik V
>Baroper Strasse 301, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
>Phone: ++49 231/755-5806, Fax: ++49 231/755-5802
I am almost 100% sure that is not the problem. The CLASSPATH is getting
read in my C code and then it is passed into the JVM using the vm_args.
Here is a snip of the code I am using to call JNI_CreateJavaVM. I am
also sure that the CLASSPATH includes the classes.zip for JVM. Also
not that this exact same code works on Solaris and Windows versions
of the JDK from Sun.
static JavaVM *javaVM = NULL;
char *path, *newPath;
JDK1_1InitArgs vm_args;
memset(&vm_args, 0, sizeof(vm_args));
vm_args.version = 0x00010001;
JNI_GetDefaultJavaVMInitArgs(&vm_args);
path = getenv("CLASSPATH");
if (path && vm_args.classpath) {
oldSize = strlen(path);
size = oldSize + strlen(vm_args.classpath);
newPath = ckalloc(size+2);
strcpy(newPath, path);
#ifdef __WIN32__
newPath[oldSize] = ';';
#else
newPath[oldSize] = ':';
#endif
strcpy(newPath+oldSize+1, vm_args.classpath);
vm_args.classpath = newPath;
} else if (path) {
vm_args.classpath = path;
}
if (JNI_CreateJavaVM(&javaVM, ¤tEnv, &vm_args) < 0) {
/* error condition */
At that point the JNI_CreateJavaVM returns an error code. Any ideas?
Thanks for the help!
mo dejong
dejong at cs.umn.edu
Re: has anyone got the native threads jdk1.1.7a1 running?
Humm, I am using 2.1.131 too but I am having no luck. Are you using the JNI to create a JVM from inside a running C process? I have been able to get some simple Java only programs working using "java -native ..." but I have not been able to get the JNI stuff working. If you have working JNI code could you send me a copy of you code so I can see if it works on my machine? Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] gimme multimedia group On Sat, 19 Dec 1998, Shane Blaser wrote: > I am using 1.1.7 native threads on with smp(2) and it is kicks butt ! > > Although it was not stable until I went to version 2.1.131 of the kernel !!! > > > Shane > > Moses DeJong wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Java News Collector wrote: > > > > > At 05:00 PM 12/16/98 -0600, Moses DeJong wrote: > > > >I have not seen much about the native threads port for 1.1.7 in the > > > >mailing list archives. Is there anyone out there that has gotten the > > > >native threads version of 1.1.7a1 to work with JNI? I have an application > > > >that compiles and works on Solaris, Windows, and IRIX but when I try to > > > >run it on my RedHat5.2 (glibc) system at home I get an error like > > > >"can not find java.lang.Object" when calling JNI_CreateJavaVM. The > > > >CLASSPATH includes the installed classes.zip so I have no idea what > > > >could be causing the error. If anyone out there wants to try out > > > >the code I was compiling it can be downloaded here. > > > > > > Is your CLASSPATH *really* set? Remember that, if you classpath is set in > > > a .bashrc or .bashprofile then it only gets set in a bash shell. If you > > > are invoking the JVM without a shell, you may want to take care that the > > > environment is really correctly set for the process that will be exec'ing > > > the JVM. > > > > > > I'm not sure what you setup is like or how your program gets invoked. > > > However, your error sounds like the JVM cannot find classes.zip. I would > > > begin by verifying that the environment is setup correctly and is getting > > > passed along to the JVM. > > > > > > Douglas Toltzman > > > > > > > The CLASSPATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH are set so that the classes.zip > > file and the native libs are visible to the JVM. I know for a fact > > that my configuration works because I can run the exact same code > > under Solaris and it works perfectly. I just do not see how this > > could be anything except a bug in the Native threads port of 1.1.7 > > from blackdown. I am not blaming anyone, the readme says the native > > threads stuff is "beta" and has not been tested. I just want to know > > if there is anyone out there that actually doen have the native threads > > stuff working on a linux box. > > > > thanks > > mo > > ___ > Simplify your holiday shopping... > Visit our partners for great holiday gifts. > http://www.netzero.net/etoys > http://www.netzero.net/amazon >
Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it. It's really too bad that more IDEs are not available for Linux. Personally, I favor Symantec's Visual Cafe over any other Java IDE, but it's not available for Linux. I remember seeing an ad for a product called "NetBeans", or something like that, that was a real IDE, and it was written in Java - so theoretically it could run on Linux. I tried it on NT, but it was too slow for my taste. But, it may be worth looking into if you REALLY want to develop Java on Linux. Kirk Ugo Cei wrote: > > Pierre Bizzotto wrote: > > > > Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE. > > Use Emacs and JDE, it's best in the long run. -- Kirk Hutchinson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Electrical & Software Engineer, Cabletron Systems What good is unused science?
