How can I contact the Sparc port developers?
I've had a few problems with the sparc port of the Blackdown JVM regarding threading issues and the HotSpot JIT. I've sent a few messages to this list already and have traversed the bug tracker without any luck. I did get a reply from a few people with suggestions, but none of them helped.\ Would it be possible for one of the developers/maintainers of the sparc port to contact me? Since it appears that my software environment is identical to other ones running Java without any problems at all (from the discussions I've had with those that already replied to me), I've come to the hypothesis that the issues might SOMEHOW be related to the hardware I'm running on (a 40 Mhz Sparcstation 10. Don't laugh. Please.). I figure it's probably a safe assumption that the majority of development and testing has occurred on UltraSparc platforms, rather than SuperSparcs (or whatever is in my Sparcstation). In any case, I'd be more than happy to offer an account and space on my server to one of the porting team members if they are interested in ironing out a few wrinkles in the current release. Thanks, Avi Cherry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release
IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk Nathan Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM has posted early-access JDK 1.3
fyi, IBM has posted an early release of JDK 1.3 at Alphaworks. See http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk -- David Marshall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] VM Systems, Inc. http://www.vmguys.com Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM 1.3 AWT question
hey guys, i don't have a glibc 2.1 box handy or i'd check this myself. the requirements include KDE or Gnome/Enlightenment. just wondering if QT or GTK is used instead of Motif maybe for the AWT?? thanks! nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release
>IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: >http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk This is awesome! Has Sun given the Blackdown group access to JDK1.3 yet? Things are getting interesting here, trouble is brewing between IBM and Sun. I don't mind being part of the battleground if it means they both support Linux. IBM also released the AIX port of JDK 1.3 - did they come out simultaneously? How closely does the IBM release track Sun's codebase? I'd heard that IBM was doing some serious re-engineering. [EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . .. . . . http://www.media.mit.edu/~nelson/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:53:35PM +0100, Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote: > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: > > > > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk > > Any ideas about the conjenctured open-sourcing of ibm-jdk1.3? The > pre-release appears to be with a 90-day evaluation licence... Whose conjecture is this? It's a port of the Sun JDK, with a lot of IBM tuning. Last I heard, Sun isn't leaning toward adopting OSS licenses. Nathan > > > -- dimitris >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release
> Nelson Minar writes: >> IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: >> http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk Nelson> This is awesome! Nelson> Has Sun given the Blackdown group access to JDK1.3 yet? Yes. Nelson> Things are getting interesting here, trouble is brewing Nelson> between IBM and Sun. I don't mind being part of the Nelson> battleground if it means they both support Linux. Nelson> IBM also released the AIX port of JDK 1.3 - did they come Nelson> out simultaneously? How closely does the IBM release track Nelson> Sun's codebase? I'd heard that IBM was doing some serious Nelson> re-engineering. IBM has its own JVM. Our 1.3 will have Sun's HotSpot VM. Juergen -- Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html JVM'01: http://www.usenix.org/events/jvm01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alphaWorks and developerWorks Wireless
developerWorks and alphaWorks goes wireless Get access to information about new developerWorks Java and Linux resources wirelessly with a Palm VII. dW has a growing collection of free developer resources consisting of developer articles, sample code, news stories, case studies, and tools. In addition, you can also keep informed about new and updated technologies added to the alphaWorks website including the new JDK for Linux 1.3.0 Download the aW-dW.pqa at: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/aw.nsf/about?readform&/aw.nsf/html/dW+aW+wireless?open&l=258,t=gr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java-LinuxPPC (was: Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release)
>IBM also released the AIX port of JDK 1.3 There's a couple of things that have me wondering why IBM does not come out with a port of their JDK for LinuxPPC: 1) IBM makes PPC chips. 2) IBM recently released a spec for a dual-processing PPC motherboard which is being manufactured by at least one company now, and it runs LinuxPPC. 2.5) LinuxPPC already runs on their RS/6000 platform. 3) IBM already has JDK (plus a good JIT) developed for the PPC platform, for AIX. 4) A high performance, stable JDK+JIT for LinuxPPC would likely sell more IBM hardware, either in the form of RS/6000 machines, or 3rd party motherboards. Right now, the Linux PPC platform is stuck without a Java2 JDK that includes a JIT and that makes it just about useless for enterprise-style Java service systems, such as servlets. Metrowerks released a JIT that works with the Blackdown JDK 1.1.8, but there isn't one for 1.2.2 or 1.3 yet and Metrowerks hasn't given any indication one way or another as to if they plan to release another one in the future. I actually just had a conversation with Kevin Hendricks, who did the original port of the blackdown JDK to PPC, and he's currently looking for people to help out with the PPC port of Java. He's especially looking for anyone with knowledge of PPC assembly, since he's currently trying to port sunwjit to PPC and is looking to perhaps try to port the Borland/Inprise JIT and possibly HotSpot as well, but he's currently working alone. Sadly, I have no experience or skill with such projects as compilers and am therefore of little help to his effort. He's asked that anybody who thinks they can help contact him. His email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avi Cherry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can I contact the Sparc port developers?
Hi, I do have an old SS5 somewhere that I used for the JDK 1.1 port. I will try to get it over to my place, and give it some upgrades (it might take a while though before I have it here). Can you send me your configuration (glibc-version and kernel)? - Johan === Johan Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sesuad'ra Projects http://www.sesuadra.org On Wed, 3 May 2000, Avi Cherry wrote: > I've had a few problems with the sparc port of the Blackdown > JVM regarding threading issues and the HotSpot JIT. I've sent a few > messages to this list already and have traversed the bug tracker > without any luck. I did get a reply from a few people with > suggestions, but none of them helped.\ > > Would it be possible for one of the developers/maintainers of the > sparc port to contact me? > > Since it appears that my software environment is identical to other > ones running Java without any problems at all (from the discussions > I've had with those that already replied to me), I've come to the > hypothesis that the issues might SOMEHOW be related to the hardware > I'm running on (a 40 Mhz Sparcstation 10. Don't laugh. Please.). I > figure it's probably a safe assumption that the majority of > development and testing has occurred on UltraSparc platforms, rather > than SuperSparcs (or whatever is in my Sparcstation). > > In any case, I'd be more than happy to offer an account and space on > my server to one of the porting team members if they are interested > in ironing out a few wrinkles in the current release. > > Thanks, > Avi Cherry > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
