Re: Java app
Marek Pawinski wrote: Hi I am trying to install a app which uses java during the installation process. I get this error : ./setup.bin "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/zerog/lax/LAX" Java looks for the com.zerog.lax.LAX class, so it must be within reach for the runtime. You must have the com.zerog.lax.LAX (or the .jar file it resides in) in your CLASSPATH variable, since Java is looking for that class in the relative path com/zerog/lax/LAX. Add the path to com.zerog.lax.LAX to your CLASSPATH variable (set in your script?), and it will work. This is by the way, not a linux problem, it is the way Java works in general. hth Rikard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing questions
On Jan 11, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Juergen Kreileder wrote: Marc St-Jean writes: BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its enti". Could someone please verify this file? You're right. Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source, the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code. Juergen Other than the corruption it appears to be the same as the Sun JDK 1.4.2_X license. This prompts me to ask, is the Blackdown license supposed to be different from Sun's? Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing questions
Marc St-Jean writes: BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its enti". Could someone please verify this file? You're right. Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source, the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code. Juergen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing questions
eek, I'm going to ask Darin what happened Juergen Kreileder wrote: Marc St-Jean writes: BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its enti". Could someone please verify this file? You're right. Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source, the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code. Juergen -- ~~~ NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ~~~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPC (debian) is driving me crazy for over a year now!
Hi, I just can't get java to work on my G3 (ppc - j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3). I can acces the JavaPluginControlPanel (that looks like he's written in Java, so I guess I have a VM), and it looks like everything's fine, just I cant get mozilla to work with the plugin. I already linked libjavaplugin_oji.so to my mozilla plugin dir (/usr/lib/mozila/plugins), but this didn't changed anything. If anyone out there could answer me, or redirect me to someone else, I would really be greatfull (year I know, that won't change you lives...) Thanks in advance! signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Re: No SIGINT with 1.4.2-rc1?
Just for the record: This problem has not happened again for a few months. I think it was associated with the libstdc++ upgrade that accompanied my Java upgrade. Sorry for my confusion. Cheers, Dave On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 14:08, David Brodrick wrote: > Hi, > I've just upgraded from 1.3.0 to Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 and am having some > grief. I've tried googling on this topic with no success.. > > Since I upgraded the JVM, some applications can no longer be terminated > with control-c! Control-\ no longer dumps information either. Also, when > I manually kill the java processes, only the particular pids that I > specify are killed. With the previous JVM I could kill one of the parent > java processes and the whole group would be terminated. > > The fault might be triggered by particular run-time or start-up > conditions. The same application that was unresponsive to control-c > earlier is now responding to it (after a restart, ie different program > instance but same program code). The applications that have been > affected are all heavily threaded FWIW. > > I've read that the JVM has a -Xrs option. I am NOT using that. > > I've seen the same behavior on at least two different computers. Both > machines are Debian stable/testing. I downloaded the JVM which was built > with gcc-3.2. > > I'd love to hear any suggestions. It is very hard to restart these > applications ATM! > > Many thanks, > Dave > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing questions
Marc St-Jean writes: Other than the corruption it appears to be the same as the Sun JDK 1.4.2_X license. This prompts me to ask, is the Blackdown license supposed to be different from Sun's? That's a question for Karl. Juergen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing questions
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:08, Marc St-Jean wrote: > I understood that some Linux distros (RedHat?) were distributing the > Blackdown JRE so there must be one live contact email where they were > able to verify licensing. RedHat does not distribute Blackdown binaries. RedHat only distributes the IBM JRE and SDK to its customers. I'm not 100% sure about other distributions, but I haven't heard about any distro shipping with the Blackdown JRE or JDK. I might be wrong though. -Dominic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
