RE: JDK 1.1.7v2 Anywhere?
You will find it at http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Sterling Moses [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 1999 08:26 > To: Java-Linux List > Subject: JDK 1.1.7v2 Anywhere? > > > I have checked the blackdown site and have not found a copy of the JDK > 1.1.7v2. Have I missed it? Does anyone know where this can be found. > > I am trying to fix the error "undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value" > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Sterling Moses > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JDK 1.1.7v2 Anywhere?
Hi, I also had the same problem. It took me about 7 tries before I got it. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 1999 14:44 > To: Aravind Selvaraje > Cc: Sterling Moses; Java-Linux List > Subject: RE: JDK 1.1.7v2 Anywhere? > > > > > http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede > > > > I don't know about anybody else, but whenever i go to donwload it it seems > to crash ie. stop before all the file has been recieved ?? > > why ??? I've tried a number of times ?? Is it available on another site > perhaps ftp ..( i don't trust netscape for large files) ;) > > > cya > > adn > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RH 5.2 -> 6.0 breaks 117
Get either JDK 117 version 2 or version 3 They can both work under glibc 2.1 which is what RH6.0 ships. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Joe Futrelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, 22 May 1999 08:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RH 5.2 -> 6.0 breaks 117 > > > Ever since upgrading to 6.0, JDK 117 is giving me > > /usr/local/java/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java: error in loading > shared libraries: > /usr/local/java/bin/../lib/i686/green_threads/libjava.so: > undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value > > what does this mean? > > > Joe Futrelle | "Brixham gushed, Rosalie was > Developer, NCSA/SDT/Emerge| pre-emptive." -- C. Hilary > [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Nottinghamshire > (217) 265-0296| > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM JDK (RE: GC... faster?)
Where can I get IBM JDK for Linux ??? -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Sandy Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 08:45 > To: Jonas Erikson > Cc: Bryce McKinlay; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GC... faster? > > > I am not to sure about Blackdown but I do that I IBM JVM for Linux. > (1.1.7 is going to be available very soon, with 1.2 to follow close) has > unbeleivable garbage collection. They do the GCing similar to HotSpot > actually if I am not mistaken their GCing is better than HotSpot. > > So you even if it is not provided by Blackdown you will have an > alternative. > > Sandy > > Jonas Erikson wrote: > > > I use jdk1.2 using massive memmory allocation (>512M) > > and at the same time WeakReferences for object persistance > > and cacheing. This usualy contributes to double GC-pass > > (from weakref) and long GC-delays. > > > > Now, does jdk1.2 use ageing GC-frames or realtime GC > > or anyting like hotspot/self features? > > > > Any plans here? > > > > My benchmark indicates a 2-5 times speedup using the > > Solaris version of jdk1.2. > > > > (you could use the GC from Self-src that is implemented in hotspot) > > > > Anyway thankyou backdown... ;-) > > > > Best, > > Jonas IllumiNet. > > > > Bryce McKinlay wrote: > > > Sandy Ward wrote: > > > > Anyone know much about the garbage collector for the > Blackdown JVM? I am talking > > > > about comparisons to Sun's, IBM's, etc. From recent > experience it seems that > > > > the GC takes one big pause to collect the garbage where as > other VM's do it a > > > > little more smoothly. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Using native threads, GC runs more smoothly with > significantly less noticable > > > pausing. > > > > > > Unfortuntatly, native threads are not working properly in the > current blackdown JDK > > > 1.1.7v3 (at least on Redhat 6.0). > > > > > > regards > > > > > > [ bryce ] > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java app server on linux ?
Yes, to DB2 from EJB. DB2 runs beautifully on Linux. I am running the beta version but it is still great. Give it plenty of memory though. But we will soon try out Oracle 8. We are fairly confident as Oracle's JDBC type 4 driver is very good. I have used it elsewhere. Hopefully should not have too many problems. -- Aravind On Sun, May 23 1999, Nitin Borwankar wrote: Nitin> Nitin> Aravind Selvaraje wrote: Nitin> > Nitin> > My case Nitin> > Nitin> > RedHat 6.0 Nitin> > JDK 1.1.7 v2 Nitin> > BEA WebLogic 4.02 Nitin> > Nitin> > Also, using Apache and Jserv. Nitin> Nitin> Do you connect to any of the big name databases over JDBC ? Nitin> ( Oracle, Sybase, DB2 ... ) Nitin> Nitin> Nitin. Nitin> Nitin> > Nitin> > Works great. Nitin> > Nitin> > > -Original Message- Nitin> > > From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Nitin> > > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30 Nitin> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> > > Subject: Java app server on linux ? Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Is anyone using (development or production) Nitin> > > a Java application server such as BEA Weblogic or even Nitin> > > an all Java HTTP server such as Javasoft's Java WebServer ? Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Is this feasible at all ? Nitin> > > Nitin> > > What version JDK do you use on what Linux distro and version ? Nitin> > > Nitin> > > I am setting up a development environment for 3-tier Java apps Nitin> > > and would like to use Linux but don't know if it's feasible Nitin> > > I would prefer cases of 100% Java app servers but those built in Nitin> > > C/C++ that serve EJB and/or Java Servlets will also do. Nitin> > > Nitin> > > I will be doing this for a development environment for production Nitin> > > applications and need some real life working cases I can point to. Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Thanks! Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Nitin Borwankar Nitin> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Nitin> > > -- Nitin> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact Nitin> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> > > Nitin> > > Nitin> Nitin> Nitin> -- Nitin> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nitin> Nitin> This is the default signature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Java app server on linux ?
My case RedHat 6.0 JDK 1.1.7 v2 BEA WebLogic 4.02 Also, using Apache and Jserv. Works great. > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Java app server on linux ? > > > > Is anyone using (development or production) > a Java application server such as BEA Weblogic or even > an all Java HTTP server such as Javasoft's Java WebServer ? > > Is this feasible at all ? > > What version JDK do you use on what Linux distro and version ? > > I am setting up a development environment for 3-tier Java apps > and would like to use Linux but don't know if it's feasible > I would prefer cases of 100% Java app servers but those built in > C/C++ that serve EJB and/or Java Servlets will also do. > > I will be doing this for a development environment for production > applications and need some real life working cases I can point to. > > Thanks! > > Nitin Borwankar > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off-Topic : Tracing
Anyone know of a good Tracing package in Java to add tracing statements in Java code that can be switched on/off at runtime ? -- Aravind -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tya for JDK117v3
Hi, Anyone successful in running tya against JDK117v3 on RH6.0 ? I changed the configure scripts for jdk117 and corrected a compilation error, but it panics while running. -- Aravind -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is TYA
Yes, it is JIT for Linux. You can download it from here ftp://gonzalez.cyberus.ca/pub/Linux/java/tya13v2.tgz It works great with JDK 1.1.7 -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Per Åhgren > Sent: Friday, 11 June 1999 17:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: What is TYA > > > I'm new to this mailing list and I have a question. > What is TYA. Is it a JIT compiler? Is it available for jdk 1.1.7 on > linux? > > Regards > Per > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java IDE
Look at this page. It has a list of all IDE's. The only thing to add is that IBM's VAJ is out as a technical preview. http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/javatools.html -- Aravind Matthias Carlsson wrote: > > I'm having problem finding a Java IDE for Linux I like, and I thought > I should give it a try and ask here. What is everyone here using to > develop their classes in Linux? I'm used to KAWA for Win32, but now > after switching to Linux I've been unable to find a good replacement. > > I would appreciate any recommendations I could get. > > -- > Matthias Carlsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web Designer / Programmer UIN: 1430647 > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mysql - jdbc???
Check out http://www.worldserver.com/mm.mysql/ It works. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: ½ÅÇöÀÏ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, 4 July 1999 19:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: mysql - jdbc??? > > > Hi.. > I test a JDBC.. > I use Mysql DB. > I want Mysql Driver file and a simple source. > anybody success this(myslq-java) send me. > thank. > I'm korean boy.. I'm not good English..sorry. > good-bye. > > > > --MIME Multi-part separator-- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM-jdk Where can I get it
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjvm > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 8 July 1999 23:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IBM-jdk Where can I get it > > > > Where can I download the JDK from IBM for Linux? > > > _ > Steve Gee > Java Developer > Maxor National Pharmacies > Information Technologies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 806.324.5540 > www.maxor.com > 806.324.5400 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ejb application server
Open Source http://www.ejboss.org http://www.openmaster.com/ejb The original, now taken over by Iona http://www.ejbhome.com Weblogic, commercial but works well on Linux http://weblogic.beasys.com -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Walter Chang > Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 1999 13:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ejb application server > > > I am looking into ejb and wondering is there any ejb application server > that will run on linux? One with Open Source is prefered, but a > commercial one that has free demo version available is ok too. Thanks > for the help! > > Walter > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connect to Oracle 7.3.4 using JDBC
As long as it is a Type 4 driver it will work on any OS as it is pure Java. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Sittidej Kuwarewong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 6 August 1999 11:16 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Connect to Oracle 7.3.4 using JDBC > > > Hello, this is the my first time posting question on this > community. How can I connect to Oracle Database 7.3.4 via JDBC > or other way using Apache JServ for Linux ? I've trying to > search download section on http://technet.oracle.com, but I found > only JDBC for Oracle Database 7 on NT and Solaris. > > Sorry for my poor English and awating for your answer. > > Best Regards, > Sittidej K. > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows'98 / Linux disparity.
Did you try with the tya jit ? Is the win98 running with the jit enabled or not ? I would also try the IBM JDK on Linux for speed comparisons. It is quite fast. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Amlan Saha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 13 August 1999 14:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Windows'98 / Linux disparity. > > > Hi people > > I tried the Java benchmark "Caffeine Mark 3.0" on both a Windows'98 > machine and a Linux machine running the JDK 1.1.7 from SUN. The > configuration for the Linux machine was RedHat 6.0 distribution, > 2.2.6 kernel and running JDK 1.1.7. Both the machines are Pentium > II-300. > > The results are as follows - > > Windows'98 Linux 2.2.6 > == === > Sieve 4710 552 > Loop 18308 440 > Logic 67904 503 > String 4945 910 > Float 7566 439 > Method 7434 501 > Graphics 445 964 > Image177 532 > Dialog 180 122 > > I am at a loss to understand as to why Linux fared so BADLY in > comparison to Windows and also why graphics under Linux is so much > better than under Windows. > > Has anybody done anything similar and any explanations ? > > -amlan. > > -- > Amlan Saha [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM's Java/Linux agenda
Agreed. Currently, IBM spends more money on Java and Java related products than Sun. With their EJB marketing they are promoting the fact that you can develop beans on your laptop, test them and when ready to scale drop them on to a mid range AIX or AS/400 box or if you want huge grunt, put them on a OS/390. The return of the mainframe Of course, you need to look no farther than their support for Linux and Java so that they can't be blackmailed by M$ for their dev platforms. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Charles Forsythe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 20 August 1999 15:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IBM's Java/Linux agenda > > > > And who thinks that the big heads at IBM have other reasons for > supporting > > java [than] ... java hurts M$. > > I don't work for IBM, but here is my best guess at a better reason for > them to support Java: the "write once run anywhere" promise. > > Consider all of the systems that IBM *currently* ships: AIX, OS/390, > OS/400, OS/2, and now (drum roll please) Linux. Not only that, but IBM > also makes sure that its systems integrate with Windows. > > Maybe they support Linux just to piss of Microsoft, but Java is "the > Cobol of the 21st Century"* for IBM. For this reason, IBM has taken > control of its own Java destiny and is producing the best JVMs around. > > -Charles > * Rough quote from "Java and the AS/400" (and IBM white paper). BTW, > IBM's new Java support for the AS/400 is really cool; it's NOT a JVM. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM's Java/Linux agenda: why JDK1.1.6 port?
They just took their stable AIX port and modified to Linux. The JIT code comes from their Intel Win32 platform. Time to market (release) was the esence. -- Aravind > -Original Message- > From: Jacob Nikom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, 23 August 1999 17:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IBM's Java/Linux agenda: why JDK1.1.6 port? > > > Do you know why IBM ported JDK1.1.6 instead of 1.1.8? I could understand > why they did not pick up 1.2, but 1.1.8 is very stable and capable of. > > Jacob > > Aravind Selvaraje wrote: > > > > Agreed. > > > > Currently, IBM spends more money on Java and Java related > products than Sun. > > > > With their EJB marketing they are promoting the fact that you > can develop > > beans on your laptop, test them and when ready to scale drop > them on to a > > mid range AIX or AS/400 box or if you want huge grunt, put them > on a OS/390. > > The return of the mainframe > > Of course, you need to look no farther than their support for > Linux and Java > > so that they can't be blackmailed by M$ for their dev platforms. > > > > -- Aravind > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Charles Forsythe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, 20 August 1999 15:32 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: IBM's Java/Linux agenda > > > > > > > > > > And who thinks that the big heads at IBM have other reasons for > > > supporting > > > > java [than] ... java hurts M$. > > > > > > I don't work for IBM, but here is my best guess at a better reason for > > > them to support Java: the "write once run anywhere" promise. > > > > > > Consider all of the systems that IBM *currently* ships: AIX, OS/390, > > > OS/400, OS/2, and now (drum roll please) Linux. Not only > that, but IBM > > > also makes sure that its systems integrate with Windows. > > > > > > Maybe they support Linux just to piss of Microsoft, but Java is "the > > > Cobol of the 21st Century"* for IBM. For this reason, IBM has taken > > > control of its own Java destiny and is producing the best JVMs around. > > > > > > -Charles > > > * Rough quote from "Java and the AS/400" (and IBM white paper). BTW, > > > IBM's new Java support for the AS/400 is really cool; it's NOT a JVM. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
