Re: VB and Access == Java and ????
Might JDBC give you the access you need to your data? I know it's helped me avoid a fair bit of VB.
Re: java 1.2 ??
According to the FAQ (http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html): > 2.5 When is the JDK 1.2 Going to be Released for Linux? > > According to Steve Byrne on Monday, May 26th 1998: > > JavaSoft is trying very hard to get a license set up with an external person > to coordinate the 1.2 Linux porting effort. The plan is not to have to wait > until 1.2 ships, but to get things underway much sooner (1.2 is huge, and > involves lots more machine specific components, and will take a while to port). HTH, Az. >-)=
Re: JDK1.1.5 with RedHat
Erm, you didn't want the libc version if you're running 5.0. I know from bitter experience: all sorts of things started crashing after I installed 5.4.44. You want the glibc version and to try to get rid of libc 5.4.44 and co.. I took the rather drastic measure of scrub- bing my box and upgrading to 5.1 while I was at it but I may simply have been too much of a newbie to know how to undo what I had done. Good luck. Paris Flegas wrote: > > I have the same problem. > I installed the libc version. > I also tried jdk 1.1.6 and nothing changed. > I have installed the latest version of libc 5.4.44 and ld.so > I ' d b egrateful if you helped me. > > On 11 Jun 1998, Preben Randhol wrote: > > > * "this is Zhao, Lenny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > | hi guys, I am not sure if anyone experence this problem before. After I > > | installed 1.1.5 under RedHat5.0, I just typed "javac"to see if it is > > | working, it give a me segmentation fault(core dump). It supposed to give > > > > did you install the glibc version? > > > > -- > > Preben Randhol| Linux was made by foreign terrorists > > Tlf73940929/(735)94076 [arb] | to take money from true US > > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]| companies like Microsoft. > > http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ | -- Some AOL'er. > >
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
Pico? Pah! Try vi. Grr! :) Az. Dustin Lang wrote: > > > What development tool do you use to help on daily coding? > > pico :) > > dstn.
Javac
Help? I've installed jdk1.1.5-v7 under Redhat 5.1 and all of a sudden (it was fine under 5.0) I get the following: > [azazel@anubis ~/misc]$ javac Test.java > No library path set. I'm sure I'm being an idiot but I just can't see the wood for the trees at the moment. Ta, Az.
Re: Javac
Doh! I *knew* there was something I was missing: I should have read the FAQ. Fixed in five minutes. :) Thanks, folks. Az. >-)= Stephen Wynne wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Azazel writes: > > Help? I've installed jdk1.1.5-v7 under Redhat 5.1 and all > of a sudden (it was fine under 5.0) I get the following: > > > [azazel@anubis ~/misc]$ javac Test.java > > No library path set. > > I'm sure I'm being an idiot but I just can't see the wood > for the trees at the moment. > > Az, > > I suspect Kaffe. Check the FAQ: > http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html > > Steve > >
Re: RH5.0 and JDK1.1.?
> > Also, is there a working Netscape for RH5.0? > > > > My copy is 4.05, and it works fine. Has anyone managed to get JDK1.1-complete preview version of 4.05 working under RH 5.0/5.1? The Java was decidedly flaky, when I installed it. Az. >-)=
Netscape 4.05
I've just installed the JDK1.1 prerelease again and this time I sorted
out the problem that cropped up last time, that I needed to have the
Netscape archive (${MOZILLA_HOME}/java/classes/java40.jar) before the
JDK archive in $CLASSPATH, - or so I thought.
This had the unfortunate effect of confusing the JDK binaries which
got to the NS jar first too. I've taken the NS jar out of the default
classpath and written a 5-line script to put it back in for Netscape.
This *seems* to work. I know some of you have 4.05-with-1.1 up and
running and I was wondering whether you had had all this fuss and bother.
Re: Sun vs microsoft? RE:We Won!
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Glenn Valenta wrote: > > > >Hey, did everyone notice that Sun won it's java suit against microsoft > > >today? The judge granted us an injunction and Microsoft has to start > > >shipping a Java implementation that complies with the test suites or > > >quit shipping windows in 90 days. > > > > > >Woo hoo, no wonder our stock went up almost $4 today!!! > > > > Is it true? > > > > if so... > > Vbeers for everybody!!! > > if so, it means that there can indeed be justice in cyberland after all. > > may the evil doers suffer from gas... It's a step in the right direction. M$ has 90 days to fix things. Whether they will and whether they'll find a way of sliming out of this obligation is an open question. Call me paranoid but until I see M$ in pieces and/or Gates destitute and begging in the gutter I will not rest easy. Apart from the matter of appeals, this is only a temporary injunction and not a final decision: the case has not gone to trial. Az. +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 www: http://www.azazel.net/ mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
Re: Equivalence
> > Hi PPL, > > I am new to this JDK... > > I would like to know the equivalent of UNIX crypt with salt > in Java.. Hear, hear. Haven't had any joy finding this, so I'm writing one. I'll let you know if/when I get it finished. :) +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
Bitwise operators
I'm out of patience and ideas. Can somebody tell me why the following code gives the
output it does. The programme should take a given long number, shift it 8 bits each
way (signed and unsigned), and print all the different bit-patterns. As I see it, one
of two things is happening.
1. There's a bug in the JDK and bitwise operators don't work properly, which
seems unlikely.
2. The dprint function is not printing the actual bit-strings but I can't see why.
public class pubtest
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
long n;
n=0xf0f0f0f0;
System.out.print("n:\t");
dprint(n);
System.out.print("n>>8:\t");
dprint(n>>8);
System.out.print("n>>>8:\t");
dprint(n>>>8);
System.out.print("n<<8:\t");
dprint(n<<8);
n=0x0f0f0f0f;
System.out.print("n:\t");
dprint(n);
System.out.print("n>>8:\t");
dprint(n>>8);
System.out.print("n>>>8:\t");
dprint(n>>>8);
System.out.print("n<<8:\t");
dprint(n<<8);
}
private static long dprint(long l)
{
for(int i=1<<31; i!=0; i>>>=1)
System.err.print((l&i)!=0?"1":"0");
System.err.print("\n");
return l;
}
}
n:
n>>8:
n>>>8:
n<<8:
n: 00001111
n>>8:
n>>>8:
n<<8: 1000
Cheers,
J.
+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
Re: Bitwise Operators.
Thanks chaps: the operators are now doing what I hoped. Learnt a valuable lesson today: if one is going to twiddle bits it helps if one is familiar with the bits one is twiddling. :) J. +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
Re: java versus c++ or perl
> Java also has the advantage that Perl (AFAIK--I'm not even a Perl newbie) > lacks in that Java has JNI, which would allow you to "call down" to C++ > code if necessary. Not true actually: a lot of the big Perl modules have cores written in C with stubs in Perl to allow one to call them easily. The Perl interface to PostgreSQL is the first example which comes to mind. To make life even more interesting, I imagine it's only a matter of time before it becomes possible to run Java from Perl and vice versa (assuming it isn't already). Ted's general point is correct tho: different langs suit different people and different projects, although if you decided on COBOL or something you'd obviously be quite mad. :) Az. +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 www: http://www.azazel.net/ mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
