jdk vs mozilla 0.9.9

[Jack Howarth]

Hi,
Since Mozilla has branched for 1.0 and will probably do a RC1
today or Monday, shouldn't we be trying to address the build problems
with the current mozilla headers. On my machine I get the following
failure...

/usr/bin/gcc -Wall -Wno-unused -Wconversion  -fPIC -c  -w -D_GNU_SOURCE -DXP_UNIX 
-DSVR4 -DVERSION="\"Blackdown-1.3.1-03-FCS\"" -DDATE="\"Apr-11-2002\"" 
-DARCH="\"ppc\"" -DRAPTOR_API -DNEW_STREAMING_API -I../../tmp/linux/ppc/CClassHeaders 
-I../../oji-plugin/src/motif/common -I../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5 
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I../../../../src/share/javavm/export 
-I../../../../src/solaris/javavm/export -I/usr/include/libIDL-1.0 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 
-I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/nspr -I-I/usr/include/nspr 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/oji 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/xpcom 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/plugi!
n !
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/java 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/caps 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/nspr 
-I../../oji-plugin/include/solaris/navig5 -o ../../tmp/linux/ppc/util5.o 
../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5/util5.cpp
/usr/bin/gcc -Wall -Wno-unused -Wconversion  -fPIC -c  -w -D_GNU_SOURCE -DXP_UNIX 
-DSVR4 -DVERSION="\"Blackdown-1.3.1-03-FCS\"" -DDATE="\"Apr-11-2002\"" 
-DARCH="\"ppc\"" -DRAPTOR_API -DNEW_STREAMING_API -I../../tmp/linux/ppc/CClassHeaders 
-I../../oji-plugin/src/motif/common -I../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5 
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I../../../../src/share/javavm/export 
-I../../../../src/solaris/javavm/export -I/usr/include/libIDL-1.0 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 
-I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/nspr -I-I/usr/include/nspr 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/oji 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/xpcom 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/plugi!
n !
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/java 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/caps 
-I/home/howarth/debian-mozilla/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/nspr 
-I../../oji-plugin/include/solaris/navig5 -o ../../tmp/linux/ppc/GetFactory5.o 
../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5/GetFactory5.cpp
../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5/GetFactory5.cpp: In function `nsresult 
NSRegisterSelf(nsISupports *, const char *)':
../../oji-plugin/src/motif/navig5/GetFactory5.cpp:132: no matching function for call 
to `nsDerivedSafe::RegisterComponent (const nsCID &, const 
char[26], const char[57], const char *&, int, int)'
make[1]: *** [../../tmp/linux/ppc/GetFactory5.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/howarth/jdkbuild/jdk1.3.x/ext/plugin/build/solaris'
make: *** [plugin-all] Error 1

I noticed that in the mozilla 0.9.9 headers that RegisterComponent is
declared in xpcom/nsComponentManagerObsolete.h now. I also notice
that inclusion of this is wrapped by 

#ifndef MOZILLA_STRICT_API
#include "nsComponentManagerUtils.h"
#include "nsComponentManagerObsolete.h"
#endif

Perhaps we need to modify the jdk plug build to make sure MOZILLA_STRICT_API
is undefined?
 Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

debian packages

[Jack Howarth]

Weren't debian packages of the currently available java 1.3.1-02b
supposed to be out by now? We are a week away from the tentative release
date for Debian woody and it would be nice to have those packages
available. Thanks in advance for any info.
 Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Roadmap ? (JIT for PPC)

[Jack Howarth]

Drew,
   I believe the IBM JIT is supposed to work pretty well except they
don't have a java plugin for mozilla. However, has anyone considered
having Blackdown approach IBM to see if they would donate their JIT
code to the Blackdown project? 
  Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc 3.1

[Jack Howarth]

   Have any changes been checked into jdk-1.3.x yet with regard
to building with gcc 3.1 on any of the linux arches? Just
curious.
   Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

re: a build for gcc3.1.x?

[Jack Howarth]

   I hate to have to tell you but it will get even worse now.
The gcc maintainers just decided to change the c++ abi yet again.
They are releasing gcc 3.1.1 next week to be followed soon by a
gcc 3.2 release with all the remaining abi changes. The gcc 3.1.x
trunk will be considered orphaned at that point and all development
will be aimed at gcc 3.2.1. So we will need 3 builds of jdk soon.
 Jack


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]