Re: Java Web Server1.1 on Linux
I am just attempting to set up the JWS on Linux. I noticed there is already a thread about it and so I thought I'd jump in and ask the same question because it isn't working for me either. I'm using Redhat 5.1. If I try to run that diff patch, it doesn't find the file startup_wrapper. After running the patch, running the: cd native; make -f Makefile.lnx install results in the error: Makefile.lnx:45: *** missing separator. Stop. I did go in and do the diffs by hand on the Makefile, but then I got errors during the make because the other diffs didn't work on the other .c files. Also, nearly all the Hunks fail in the patch process. Any ideas? Thanks, Joel Shellman TaoTree, Inc. http://www.tou.com/
Getting applets to run on Netscape 4.06
I'm running Redhat 5.1, KDE 1.0 and Netscape 4.06 with JDK1.1.6v5. I get the following error when trying to access an applet: " Warning: JIT compiler "jit" not found. Will use interpreter. Could not get localized resources: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: native method java/util/ResourceBundle.getClassContext not found: : undefined symbol: Java_java_util_ResourceBundle_getClassContext__ ... ... Using English Language Default " What's going on? How can I fix this? Thank you, Joel Shellman TaoTree, Inc. http://www.tou.com/
Re: Java and 3D.
Related question. Does anyone know how or if there is a way to use the Java 3D kit on Linux? I tried to download it but realized it was an executable and therefore not runnable on linux. Thank you, Joel Shellman http://corp.knocean.com/
Re: JDK 1.2 bogus license terms
Matt Welsh wrote: > > JDK 1.2 is out, and the license (http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/LICENSE) > contains the following language: > > > You may not publish or provide the results of any benchmark or comparison > > tests run on Software to any third party without the prior written consent > > of Sun. > > This is clearly a problem, and I'm wondering if we should speak to someone > at Sun about it. > > My guess is that this clause isn't even enforceable by law, since publication > of benchmark results doesn't appear to infringe on Sun's intellectual > property rights in the Java software. Does anyone know of a case where a > license restricting benchmark-results publication was successfully enforced > in court? Or shot down in court? > > Matt Welsh That kind of clause is quite standard in pre-release hardware/software where it is distributed to a limited audience before being released. The reason being that because it is "not done yet" any benchmarks would not necessarily reflect the finished product. 1.2 has been released, though, so... I'm not sure. Maybe they forgot to take it out. -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive http://corp.knOcean.com/
Signal 11 from TYA?
I'm running apache 1.3.4 on Redhat 5.1 with JServ 1.0b2, JDK1.1.7v1a and TYA1.2v3 and getting the following error in the apache error log file: E0608 Unexpected result from mutex.4 TYA:Signal 11 in doWork Anyone know what could cause this? It was running just fine before (on a solaris box). Thank you, Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive http://corp.knocean.com/
Re: Offering help on 1.2.
I realize this is off-topic and off-list, but I have tried twice to email Rob Schoening privately and both times the email bounced. And the fact is I'm rather desparate. I saw Rob's post regarding Java on the BeOS and it renewed my hopes. Is there any Java port for the BeOS? I don't care what version, is there a JVM at all for the BeOS available and where? Thank you and of course, please reply privately as this is not on-topic for the list. -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/
Re: BEOS port help on 1.2.
Uncle George wrote: > > I do not think that there is a port, but rather an effort. i do not know > whats going on, but I can help in some regart to the port effort. > gat > Joel Shellman wrote: > > > ail bounced. And the fact is I'm rather desparate. > > > > I saw Rob's post regarding Java on the BeOS and it renewed > > my hopes. Is there any Java port for the BeOS? I don't care > > what version, is there a JVM at all for the BeOS available > > and where? First of all, let's try to take this off this list. I'm posting again so I can redirect any further correspondence to a new location. Thank you for telling me. Look, if there is an effort, let's get it organized. I'll gladly set up a web site and mailing list for the effort. If anyone knows if there already is such a thing, please tell me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Otherwise in two days, if I do not hear that there is already an organized effort somewhere, I'll put up a site at the following url to get started: http://beos.knOcean.com/ Look for it on Thursday (perhaps earlier). Considering I've done several searches on a couple search engines and couldn't find anything about it... I don't know if there is any other website about it. Also, one more note--Rob, I responded to your private email (thank you) but it still could not be delivered. What's up with your email address? Thanks, Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/
Re: IBM to deploy LinuxPPC on RS6000 servers...
Speaking of LinuxPPC: I have been trying to get my hands on a LinuxPPC CD. Does anyone know where I can get one? I've tried to contact www.linuxppc.com but received not reply. If anyone know where I could get one locally (Provo, Utah, USA), that would be even better. Thanks! And to make this on-topic... Does anyone know of any special considerations about getting Java, Apache, and Apache-JServ running on LinuxPPC? -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/ Jerry McBride wrote: > > Wow! > > Have a gander at http://www.techweb.com/se/directlink.cgi?CRN19990208S0005 > > Basically, IBM has been very impressed with the way that Linux has kicked NT > butt all-over the server market and is planing to bundle LinuxPPC on their > RS6000 servers! It looks as though Big Blue is taking advantage of the delayed > deployment of... Windows 2000! > > Wow! > > -- > > /\ > | Jerry McBride | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > \/
Re: Java-Linux enthusiasts
John Goerzen wrote: > A valid categorization, I believe. I clearly belong best to #4, but a > difference is that I believe that Linux will be overtaken by something else. > Hurd, for instance, when it gets more stable (but we're looking at years > here). I think I might second this--I like Linux and all, but I'm starting to discover various problems with it (well, everything has problems I suppose...) > Java has serious problems with speed, bloat, licensing and open-ness. Its > cross-platform nature prevents it from being useful for certain types of > programming that are best done in C; for instance, high-usage web servers or > NFS. I also believe that applets are a fairly odd idea, and are not done in > a good manner. Most that I've seen have very little use. I don't believe you're being fair to applets with that last sentence. Just because so many people create completely worthless applets doesn't mean it isn't being used in a good way somewhere--like corporate Intranets that you probably haven't seen. > On the other hand, I believe Java is almost ideal for GUI design, especially > for the client in client-server programming. A GUI interface is sitting > idle over 99% of the time, so speed is not so vital here. Wierd. This is my biggest (only?) complaint against Java is the very slow GUI it runs. I run Java servlets and they do wonderfully. But running a GUI written in Java? No thanks... too slow. > Cross-platform > capabilities are a big win; a universal network client can be a big time > saver for people that need clients on lots of platforms. Amen. > I would certainly not use Java for CGI. libapache-mod-perl, FastCGI, etc. > if necessary. I would certainly like to see some benchmarks comparing speed of C/C++ written FastCGI verses Java servlets (with a good JIT). I'm pretty sure servlets outrun anything else, just wondering how it compares there. And... I recently moved our web sites and clients from Solaris to Linux boxes. One of our services is written in Java servlets. The move was a total breeze (tar--ftp--untar). One of our clients had some C++ CGI programs. It was a week or two before all the problems were ironed out. Still trying to recompile some of them. -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/
Re: Sun's License for Java 2
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Uli Luckas wrote: > > > Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux > > porters? > > But how many people does IBM have working on the porting effort versus > the number of people working on hte Linux port? And how many people at > IBM are working on their port as a paying job versus a porting effort > being worked on in addition to someone's paying job. I think that's an > unfair comparison. I don't think you read the question properly. The point wasn't that they were getting it out sooner, but that they were publishing what was termed a "almost" ready version--which should not be distributable according to the license--the very reason we don't have access to the Linux JDK1.2 port yet. Unless of course, "almost" ready means it passes all the JCK but still isn't finished? -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unidentified subject!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am developing a network performance benchmarking program > with java. I have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1 > but i am getting very slow prefrormance. i.e. a for loop > from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while when using vcafe in windows95 it > needs about 1 sec on the same machine. I am doing something wrong ? What can > i do to maximize the performace of my linux when running java? One thing you might take into consideration, vcafe for java supposedly has one of the fastest JITs available. That might not be fair to compare with. -- Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
