Re: Java Plugin doesn't work

1998-10-16 Thread Patrick Lamb

Robert P. Biuk-Aghai wrote:
> 
> I installed the Java Plugin (activator-linux-glibc) on Linux 2.0.34
> with Netscape 4.06. At the end of installation I'm told:
> 
>   Java(TM) Plug-in installation done.
> 
> but in the Netscape window it says:
> 
>   You do not have the Java(TM) Plug-in installed.
> 
> I tried this several times. The first time round, it said something
> about unreferenced symbol: stat, or something like that. I have not
> been able to reproduce this message later, however.
> 
I got it to work by setting the NPX_PLUGIN_PATH environment variable. 
(It's in one of the FMs...)  IIRC, it isn't supposed to be needed for a
default installation, but the plugin suddenly started working when I set
it anyhow.  In my case I set
  NPX_PLUGIN_PATH=/home/pdlamb/.netscape/plugins
  export NPX_PLUGIN_PATH
in my .bashrc.  

Pat

> I have the JDK 1.1.6v2 glibc port and following libraries:
> 
> libc-2.0.7.so
> libdl-2.0.7.so
> ld-2.0.7.so
> 
> java -version says:
> 
> java version "1.1.6"
> 
> I realize that this is one minor version higher than what it says in
> the README at Blackdown, but would really not like to downgrade my
> setup just to get the Plugin to work. Is is possible to make it work
> with my current setup, and if so, how?
> 
> Robert.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Robert P Biuk-Aghai, University of Macau, Faculty of Science and Technology
> http://hyperg.sftw.umac.mo/robert/tel: +853-3974365fax: +853-838314
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question and the answer is no.

-- 
Alcohol and calculus don't mix.  Never drink and derive.
Patrick Lamb, Ph.D.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(256) 837-5282 x1253 voice,   (256) 830-0287 FAX

With all my employer's PR people, they can tell you the company opinion.
If it has one...



Re: java versus c++ or perl

1999-05-07 Thread Patrick Lamb

I'd like to add three things to Ted's comments.  With respect to speed, if
you want to get  running quickly, perl is probably faster to write and
debug than either Java or C++ (if you are equally fluent in all three
languages).  If you are writing something to be called through CGI, perl's
CGI.pm will speed things along even more.

Also, for text processing, such as parsing or form generation, perl can
match or exceed C++.  I don't know how it does it, but it does it.

Finally, if you are connecting to an external database, you might consider
an Apache/mod-perl combination.  With the mod-perl module, you can open a
connection into the database for each server and keep it open; I'm told
this can save half a second or more for each server connection.  I haven't
done this one myself, but I can vouch for the first two.

You might ask, what's a perl fanatic doing on a Java mailing list?  I use
perl for most of the server-side work, and Java on the browser side.

Pat

At 02:36 PM 5/6/99 -0700, Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oh, Lord, what, you WANT a flame war?
>
>Look, here's my bottom line: With Power Comes Complexity. Perl is simpler
>than Java, Java is simpler than C++. With that simplicity you lose a
>corresponding amount of power. But the end result is that it doesn't
>matter--you can accomplish just about any project in just about any
>language. C++ will be fastest, Java will come in second (due to the
>presence of JITs and the like), and Perl will be last.
>
...
>My personal preference is for C++ and Java, since (a) those are the two
>languages I know the best, and (b) I'm adept enough with either one that I
>can produce reusable code that can be used in a variety of situations. If I
>had to choose one vs. the other, I'd lean towards Java, simply because it's
>a nice compromise between a high-level language like Perl and an
>object-oriented language like C++--not too much power sacrificed to get
>some nice simplicity.
>
...
>At 02:08 PM 5/6/99 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>we are having a discussion here at work about the deployment of a web based
>>database,
>>
>>i think jdbc is the choice othere think perl or c++ is the way to go, any
>>thoughts/links etc?
>>
>>thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]