Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > SAYS WHO??? > > The BEST IDE for JAVA (better than SVC), is NETBEANS... not sure if it's the best, but I've found I like it, too. > try http://www.netbeans.com... it is 100% swing based. u need JDK1.1.6 (not > 1.1.7/1.1.5). Hmmm...I'm sure I've run it with 1.1.7. -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt
Re: JavaLinux for servlets [off-topic]
Chris Huebsch wrote: > AFAIK unix doesn't support real threads. Are you sure you want to make such a generalization about Unix? I've got a couple of books that cover threads programming on Solaris. Is there something "unreal" about Solaris ( or UnixWare ) threads? -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt
Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Christopher Rowan wrote: > > > Oops, I thought he was referring to something else. > > > > Didn't Microsoft have a Unix-like OS with a name similar to Minix? > > Xenix, now known as SCO Unix. Not really, different source base. In fact, one of the gripes people had about SCO first release of Unix was that it was slower and more of a resource hog than Xenix. -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt
Re: problems with rmi (linux 1.2 client, solaris 1.3 server)
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> RMIRegistry can't find the _Stub class. It needs three classes in order
> to function (interface, _Stub, _Skel).
That isn't strictly true. If you use rmic -v1.2 all you'll get
( at least all I've gotten so far ) are _Stub's. Works fine with
a 1.2 VM.
By default rmic creates stubs and skeletons to be compatible with
both 1.1 and 1.2.
At 12:25 1/11/00 -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> > RMI doesn't send classfiles
Well, it shouldn't, but I've seen it do so with a simple class
that wasn't written properly ( woops ;).
~Rob
--
wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered
de recta non tolerandum sunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jserv up-to-date howto
> Do you know a recent tutorial that I can use to clear this job?
The book "Professional Java Server Programming" also has a good
section of JServ config.
In addation, if you're running a RedHat ( or RedHat derived ) distro
there's an rpm available that make JServ install a snap.
~Rob
--
wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered
de recta non tolerandum sunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM 1.3 full release
Julio Cesar Aguilar Cabrera wrote: > > > Some of u managed to download the packages?? > > I did download the RPM package (27+Mb) without a problem. > I installed it but had time for nothing else. > Downloaded the tarball version, put it where I wanted it, and tried the Java2D demo. After the intro ran for awhile a nullPointer exception was spit out and the rest of the demo was incredibly slow. -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 out 3 jvms don't work properly on my system
Hi all,
I've come across a situation that's very puzzling to me. I've
been trying jBoss on a couple of my Linux systems ( RH 6.2 + various
updates ).
When I run jBoss with IBM's JDK 1.3 is seems to run fine ( no long
term testing done yet ), but both the Sun and Blackdown JDK 1.3
fail to startup jBoss. I've tried various settings of memory and
jit with no substantial effect ( -Xms and -Xmx would change how
far along things got according to -verbose, but the jvm would
always get to a point where loading just stops ).
One of the systems in question is UP, AMD K6-2, 320Meg RAM.
The other is SMP, 2x333Mhz PII, 128 Meg RAM.
Having never seen anything like this I was hoping someone here might
have suggestions as to how to isolate what the problem is.
Thanks,
~Rob
--
wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered
de recta non tolerandum sunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jvision and Linux ?
Try this: ./jvision121unixinstall.bin LAX_VM /usr/bin/java IIRC that how to tell the installer explicitely where your VM is on Linux. Joern Kottmann wrote: > > Hello :) > > I'm new at this mailinglist I'm a pupil from Germany and 16 years old, > I can't speak English very well. I hope you can understand me :) > > I have a Problem with Jvision, I don't get it running can someone help > me out ? > > Here is that waht have try: > > [root@wozu joern]# ./jvision121unixinstall.bin > InstallAnywhere is preparing to install... > > Please choose a Java virtual machine to run this program. > (These virtual machines were found on your PATH) > - > 1. Exit. > > No Java virtual machine could be found from your PATH > environment variable. You must install a VM prior to > running this program. > > [root@wozu joern]# echo -n $PATH > /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin > > [root@wozu joern]# type java > java is /usr/bin/java > > Have someone an idea what I do wrong ? > > Grüße > Jörn :) > -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Java IDEs
Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
> But I'm not posting to whine about that; rather I want to ask you
> guys which IDE our company should use instead,
The one that works best for you. :)
After trying 4 or 5 I found JBuilder worked very well for me. I
suppose it does have it's quirks, but I have yet to find and IDE
that doesn't. Perhaps it's a matter of finding the one with quirks
that are most agreeable to one's own.
Borland also has news groups you can get just about any question
answered via.
I use JBuilder on both Linux and Lose2K. Works fine on both.
~Rob
--
wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered
de recta non tolerandum sunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux Java IDEs
Chris Kakris wrote: > > > This probably doesn't really help you but I wanted to raise my hand > and say that there are people how are very productive even without > using one of those bloated IDEs. Oops did I say that? This is one of those dirty little secrets that tends not get mentioned in the 'minimum system requitements'. And thank you for pointing it out. Goodness knows I've also written plenty of code with NEdit/JEdit/XEmacs. Side note, if you have the system for it, a good IDE has tools that speed just about any kind of coding, not just UI building. ~Rob -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: java segfaults on Hello.java
I've seen similar beharvior on a RedHat 7.1 system with a 2.4.2 kernel: [user@system]$ java -version java version "1.3.1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS, mixed mode) Another exception has been detected while we were handling last error. Dumping information about last error: ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A) PC= 0x0x4026b988 SIGNAL= 11 FUNCTION NAME = (N/A) LIBRARY NAME = (N/A) Please check ERROR REPORT FILE for further information, if there is any. Good bye. Aborted "Michael ." wrote: > > This error, incidentally, comes about half the time, > running the command line repeatedly. Adding "-Xrs" > reduces the occurrence to about 1 out of 10 times (and > gives a different PC value, no surprise). Running from > jdb, the error doesn't occur at all. > > Leads me to suspect a bug in java's shutdown code. > > If anyone else has seen this behavior (or not), I'd > like to know your configuration. > > > $ java greetings.Hello World Universe Everyone > > [...] > > Another exception has been detected while we were > > handling last error. > > Dumping information about last error: > > ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A) > > PC= 0x0x4025e988 > > SIGNAL= 11 > > FUNCTION NAME = (N/A) > > LIBRARY NAME = (N/A) > > Please check ERROR REPORT FILE for further > > information, if there is any. > > Good bye. > > Segmentation fault > > -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:|:.prohibitions void where offered de recta non tolerandum sunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
