Re: Minimum configuration for JRE use?
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Scot E. Wilcoxon wrote: > The FAQ has vague references to JDK resource needs. > > Anyone have an estimate of the minimum configuration > needed for the Linux JRE? That is, what's the smallest > system which can run Linux Java programs, not the JDK? > (I happen to be wondering about 486 12M RAM/20M disk > at the moment) I happen to run the linux JDK on a 486/66 yesterday. 16MB of RAM and complete Redhat 5.2. Compiling a little java servlet took about 9 minutes to compile! And javac is just a java program, like any other... So I guess it won't be a good idea tu run java on a 486... My guess is that min requirements are +- pentium 75Mhz+ 20MB of RAM. A workable Linux distribution (you should be able to do something with it...) takes about 50Mb + some swap + extra space for java process = 100Mb. -Yves
Re: Unidentified subject!
Sure, you need to write the escape codes for that. -Yves On Fri, 14 May 1999, Daniel Ignat wrote: > hi > > Q: it's possible in java to use color in text-mode ? > > DANIEL > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > == "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM-jdk
You can upgrade to glibc 2.1 from redhat 6.0 with rpm but you should be carefull. When there is some problem while installing and you end up with a half-installed glibc then your system will become unusable. Especially when you're new fixing such system is not trivial and it would be better to upgrade to the whole redhat 6.X using the installer. -Yves On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Justin Lawler wrote: > how would you go about upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1. > (it is glibc2.0 in redhat5.1, is it?) and is it a trivial matter, > or can it be very messy? I'm relatively new in Linux. > > thanks. > > Justin. > > jools enticknap wrote: > > > >Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one > > >test-program that creates 10 threads, allocates an array and puts some > > >random numbers in that array. It seems extremely fast. It beats kaffe > > >(by a large margin) and even the SUN-JDK on Solaris (with a faster > > >processor)! > > > > > > > Yep, I evaluated it about a week ago. It's VERY fast and pretty reliable. > > > > However it's only 1.1.6 and I really need 1.2 for my work, but I think it > > shows us that IBM is serious about Java. > > > > --Jools > > > > P.S. > > > > Please note that IBM have only appeared to have released a version for glibc > > 2.1 NOT 2.0. So don't bother unless you are running suse 6.1 or Redhat 6.0 > > or a glibc 2.1 based system. > > > > You can pick it up from; > > > > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjvm > > > > __ > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > = First, they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -- M. Ghandi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alternative for java.awt
You can run the virtual X server (Xvfb). It doesn't use that much resources as a real X server does. -Yves On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Boban Acimovic/Forritun AKS hf. wrote: > Is there any API that could be alternative for java.awt and doesn't need X > server running? > > I can't believe that I can't create images on dedicated Web server and send > it to clients over http response if I don't run X!!! It's also security, if > java.awt need X server, and we know that there were some security problems > regarding X, then Java also have security problem. > > I've heard that Blackdown is working on JDK 1.1.8 and independant java.awt. > Do anybody have idea when that bundle will be finished? Also I would like to > hear some technical details regarding java.awt in JDK 1.1.8 (probably some > Blackdown team's member is also here). Any help would be appreciated. > > Boban Acimovic, Web developer > Forritun AKS, Iceland > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > = First, they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -- M. Ghandi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java as CGI - problem
Install JServ:http://java.apache.org -Yves On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Alexey Philimonov wrote: > Hi! > > I'm running website on RedHat Linux 5.1+Apache 1.3.3 and got a problem > trying to use Java program as CGI: > > - when I run java program from the shell as "java myclass" - output > is ok > > - when I put the same command in shell script and run it - I > perfectly get both script and Java output > > - when I try to get the same script thru http, I get only script output. > None of Java output isn't present on the page. > > Question: what shall I do to make Java output reach Apache? > > best regards, > Alexey > > > Yves De Muyter System Administrator Vlaanderen Digitaal Vlamingenstraat 116Webmaster www.id21.be 3000 Leuven HTML - Database connection solutions 016/29 33 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. - Albert Einstein
