[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/24 06:00:23 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: metadata tests Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +2 -0 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 22 Feb 2002 16:44:33 - 1.9 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 24 Feb 2002 14:00:23 - 1.10 @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.loading.LoadingSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.varia.VariaSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.query.QuerySUITE.suite()); + suite.addTest(test.compliance.metadata.MetaDataSUITE.suite()); + return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: ejort Date: 02/02/22 08:44:33 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: Default Domain, Querying, Various Other Fixes Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -0 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 8 Feb 2002 21:27:53 - 1.8 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 22 Feb 2002 16:44:33 - 1.9 @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.timer.TimerSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.loading.LoadingSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.varia.VariaSUITE.suite()); + suite.addTest(test.compliance.query.QuerySUITE.suite()); return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: ejort Date: 02/02/08 13:27:53 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: Addition of sundry testsuite Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +1 -1 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 3 Feb 2002 19:07:36 - 1.7 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 8 Feb 2002 21:27:53 - 1.8 @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.relation.RelationSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.timer.TimerSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.loading.LoadingSUITE.suite()); - + suite.addTest(test.compliance.varia.VariaSUITE.suite()); return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/02/03 11:07:37 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +2 -1 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/26 21:04:08 1.6 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/02/03 19:07:36 1.7 @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.monitor.MonitorSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.relation.RelationSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.timer.TimerSUITE.suite()); - + suite.addTest(test.compliance.loading.LoadingSUITE.suite()); + return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: ejort
Date: 02/01/26 07:10:30
Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +54 -53jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java
Index: ComplianceSUITE.java
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/18 17:28:40 1.4
+++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/26 15:10:29 1.5
@@ -1,53 +1,54 @@
-/*
- * JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS
- *
- * Distributable under LGPL license.
- * See terms of license at gnu.org.
- */
-
-package test.compliance;
-
-import junit.framework.Test;
-import junit.framework.TestSuite;
-
-/**
- * Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests
- * which should pass as much as possible against the JMX RI
- *
- * Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a
- * test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-)
- *
- * Anyone contributing to the JBoss JMX impl should seriously
- * consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes
- * in the impl itself - ala XP.
- *
- * The only restriction is that if the tests don't succeed against
- * the RI, the test error message should indicate that the test
- * will fail on the RI (preferred way) or at least comment the testcase
- * stating expected failures. Either way, you should comment the code
- * justifying why the test is valid despite failing against the RI.
- *
- * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a.
- */
-
-public class ComplianceSUITE extends TestSuite
-{
- public static void main(String[] args)
- {
- junit.textui.TestRunner.run(suite());
- }
-
- public static Test suite()
- {
- TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(All Compliance Tests);
-
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.objectname.ObjectNameSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.notcompliant.NCMBeanSUITE.suite());
-
- return suite;
- }
-}
+/*
+ * JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS
+ *
+ * Distributable under LGPL license.
+ * See terms of license at gnu.org.
+ */
+
+package test.compliance;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import junit.framework.TestSuite;
+
+/**
+ * Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests
+ * which should pass as much as possible against the JMX RI
+ *
+ * Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a
+ * test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-)
+ *
+ * Anyone contributing to the JBoss JMX impl should seriously
+ * consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes
+ * in the impl itself - ala XP.
+ *
+ * The only restriction is that if the tests don't succeed against
+ * the RI, the test error message should indicate that the test
+ * will fail on the RI (preferred way) or at least comment the testcase
+ * stating expected failures. Either way, you should comment the code
+ * justifying why the test is valid despite failing against the RI.
+ *
+ * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a.
+ */
+
+public class ComplianceSUITE extends TestSuite
+{
+ public static void main(String[] args)
+ {
+ junit.textui.TestRunner.run(suite());
+ }
+
+ public static Test suite()
+ {
+ TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(All Compliance Tests);
+
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.objectname.ObjectNameSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.notcompliant.NCMBeanSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.relation.RelationSUITE.suite());
+
+ return suite;
+ }
+}
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: ejort Date: 02/01/26 13:04:08 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: Add monitor and timer tests Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +2 -0 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/26 15:10:29 1.5 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/26 21:04:08 1.6 @@ -47,7 +47,9 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.notcompliant.NCMBeanSUITE.suite()); + suite.addTest(test.compliance.monitor.MonitorSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.relation.RelationSUITE.suite()); + suite.addTest(test.compliance.timer.TimerSUITE.suite()); return suite; } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: squirest
Date: 02/01/18 09:28:40
Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
Log:
added testcases for mbean inheritance
added testcases for some types of NotCompliant MBeans
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +53 -52jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java
Index: ComplianceSUITE.java
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/18 01:12:22 1.3
+++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/18 17:28:40 1.4
@@ -1,52 +1,53 @@
-/*
- * JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS
- *
- * Distributable under LGPL license.
- * See terms of license at gnu.org.
- */
-
-package test.compliance;
-
-import junit.framework.Test;
-import junit.framework.TestSuite;
-
-/**
- * Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests
- * which should pass as much as possible against the JMX RI
- *
- * Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a
- * test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-)
- *
- * Anyone contributing to the JBoss JMX impl should seriously
- * consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes
- * in the impl itself - ala XP.
- *
- * The only restriction is that if the tests don't succeed against
- * the RI, the test error message should indicate that the test
- * will fail on the RI (preferred way) or at least comment the testcase
- * stating expected failures. Either way, you should comment the code
- * justifying why the test is valid despite failing against the RI.
- *
- * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a.
- */
-
-public class ComplianceSUITE extends TestSuite
-{
- public static void main(String[] args)
- {
- junit.textui.TestRunner.run(suite());
- }
-
- public static Test suite()
- {
- TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(All Compliance Tests);
-
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.objectname.ObjectNameSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite());
- suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite());
-
- return suite;
- }
-}
+/*
+ * JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS
+ *
+ * Distributable under LGPL license.
+ * See terms of license at gnu.org.
+ */
+
+package test.compliance;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import junit.framework.TestSuite;
+
+/**
+ * Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests
+ * which should pass as much as possible against the JMX RI
+ *
+ * Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a
+ * test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-)
+ *
+ * Anyone contributing to the JBoss JMX impl should seriously
+ * consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes
+ * in the impl itself - ala XP.
+ *
+ * The only restriction is that if the tests don't succeed against
+ * the RI, the test error message should indicate that the test
+ * will fail on the RI (preferred way) or at least comment the testcase
+ * stating expected failures. Either way, you should comment the code
+ * justifying why the test is valid despite failing against the RI.
+ *
+ * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a.
+ */
+
+public class ComplianceSUITE extends TestSuite
+{
+ public static void main(String[] args)
+ {
+ junit.textui.TestRunner.run(suite());
+ }
+
+ public static Test suite()
+ {
+ TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(All Compliance Tests);
+
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.objectname.ObjectNameSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite());
+ suite.addTest(test.compliance.notcompliant.NCMBeanSUITE.suite());
+
+ return suite;
+ }
+}
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: squirest Date: 02/01/17 17:12:22 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: testsuite updates, mostly related to standard MBeanInfo Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +7 -8 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/16 11:37:44 1.2 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/18 01:12:22 1.3 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ /** * Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests - * which bmust/b pass 100% against the JMX RI. + * which should pass as much as possible against the JMX RI * * Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a * test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-) @@ -21,13 +21,12 @@ * consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes * in the impl itself - ala XP. * - * bThe only restriction is to make sure everything in - * test.compliance passes 100% against the RI./b (in case - * I didn't make that clear enough already) + * The only restriction is that if the tests don't succeed against + * the RI, the test error message should indicate that the test + * will fail on the RI (preferred way) or at least comment the testcase + * stating expected failures. Either way, you should comment the code + * justifying why the test is valid despite failing against the RI. * - * FIXME - need to provide a way to run these suites against the - * RI and the JBoss impl via ant - * * @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a. */ @@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite()); - + return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: juhalindfors Date: 02/01/16 03:37:44 Modified:src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java Log: add mmb suite Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -1 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java Index: ComplianceSUITE.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ComplianceSUITE.java 2001/12/20 01:50:58 1.1 +++ ComplianceSUITE.java 2002/01/16 11:37:44 1.2 @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite()); suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite()); - + suite.addTest(test.compliance.modelmbean.ModelMBeanSUITE.suite()); + return suite; } } ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jmx/src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
User: squirest
Date: 01/12/19 17:50:59
Added: src/main/test/compliance ComplianceSUITE.java
Log:
First pass at a suite of compliance tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/ComplianceSUITE.java
Index: ComplianceSUITE.java
===
/*
* JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS
*
* Distributable under LGPL license.
* See terms of license at gnu.org.
*/
package test.compliance;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
/**
* Everything under test.compliance is a set of unit tests
* which bmust/b pass 100% against the JMX RI.
*
* Additions to this package are welcome/encouraged - adding a
* test that fails is a great way to communicate a bug ;-)
*
* Anyone contributing to the JBoss JMX impl should seriously
* consider providing a testcase prior to making code changes
* in the impl itself - ala XP.
*
* bThe only restriction is to make sure everything in
* test.compliance passes 100% against the RI./b (in case
* I didn't make that clear enough already)
*
* FIXME - need to provide a way to run these suites against the
* RI and the JBoss impl via ant
*
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Trevor Squires/a.
*/
public class ComplianceSUITE extends TestSuite
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
junit.textui.TestRunner.run(suite());
}
public static Test suite()
{
TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(All Compliance Tests);
suite.addTest(test.compliance.objectname.ObjectNameSUITE.suite());
suite.addTest(test.compliance.standard.StandardSUITE.suite());
suite.addTest(test.compliance.registration.RegistrationSUITE.suite());
suite.addTest(test.compliance.server.ServerSUITE.suite());
return suite;
}
}
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
