RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
Yes, I added those lines and kept them commented because there are some new classes in 1.4, like java.sql.SavePoint, so it would break uncommented for 1.3. The only way to get around it would be to use import java.sql.*; instead but it's not usually recommended, so I left it that way. -- Guillaume -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andreas Schaefer Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:05 PM To: Jason Dillon; marc fleury Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied I hate W2K, really. Or at least the implementation of JDK on W2K. I am not able to run two different JDKs on the same W2K box, long live Unix. I removed JDK1.4 and not compilation worked fine. The reason why I installed JDK1.4 is that someone reported strange runtime errors with JMX on JSR-77. Andy - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied ConnectionInPool.java and StatementInPool.java has some commented lines which metion to uncomment them for 1.4. What is 1.4 requires these? Any reason why they need to be commented? Will this break uncommented for 1.3? --jason ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
What are the problems? --jason __ View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5188 ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |Andreas Schaefer |Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:50 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied | | |Any idea when this is going to be fixed ? | |Problems in Connector as well as Testsuite module. do a clean checkout, they build on my machine marcf | |x |Andreas Schaefer |Senior Consultant |JBoss Group, LLC |x | | | |___ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
clean co works for you? doing better? let us know if it is still broken, last I saw it was ok, marcf __ View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5188 ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
Timestamp by above gives me error on build ... let Me guess nobody elsehasthe BALLS to to say so - hehehehehehe /Uknowwho on 1-12-08 00.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clean co works for you? doing better? let us know if it is still broken, last I saw it was ok, marcf __ View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5188 ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied
I hate W2K, really. Or at least the implementation of JDK on W2K. I am not able to run two different JDKs on the same W2K box, long live Unix. I removed JDK1.4 and not compilation worked fine. The reason why I installed JDK1.4 is that someone reported strange runtime errors with JMX on JSR-77. Andy - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 5:45 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss build faied ConnectionInPool.java and StatementInPool.java has some commented lines which metion to uncomment them for 1.4. What is 1.4 requires these? Any reason why they need to be commented? Will this break uncommented for 1.3? --jason ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development