Re: [JBoss-dev] Replacing JBossMQ
Yes, that jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jms/jndi/JBossMQProvider.java is so that JBossMQ can deliver messages to the MDBs. But if you wish to use SonicMQ from your EJBs that way that it is documented in the EJB 2.0 spec, then you ne to write a resource adapter for SonicMQ also. Take a look at the org.jboss.jms.ra package in jboss. I think it might be generic enough to work with sonic.. Let us know if it works, Regards, Hiram - Original Message - From: Christian Riege [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:48 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Replacing JBossMQ hi everybody, I need to access SonicMQ from my EJB's and I also need to use it for delivering messages to my Message Driven Beans (project w/ a client who is already using SonicMQ for his internal messaging). Looking at the source of JBoss (CVS HEAD checkout) I *guess* that I have to write something along the lines of jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jms/jndi/JBossMQProvider.java i.e. a SonicMQProvider.java where I access the JNDI provided from SonicMQ and then place this SonicMQProvider into jboss.jcml replacing the standard JBossMQProvider. Is this the correct approach or am I missing something here? Best regards, Christian -- Riege Software International GmbH Phone: +49 (2159) 91 48 - 0 Mollsfeld 10 Fax : +49 (2159) 91 48 - 11 40670 Meerbusch, Germany http://www.riege.com/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Replacing JBossMQ
hi, On 23 May 2001 10:46:31 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote: I do not believe that SonicMQ supports the optional JMS ASF api, nor XA transactions, which will make implementing MDB very difficult. You might want to use the bridge to a JBossMQ provider for your beans instead. OK, that would be a workable solution for the time being. I was actually thinking along the same lines (i.e. using the JMS Bridge product) but thought that replacing JBossMQ altogether would be a cleaner approach (one less system to take care of/administrate). Thanks a lot for the clarification on this issue, it *is* actually documented in the MDB section of the JBoss manual (under Advanced MDB Configuration) but that section was a bit confusing for me. Probably your statement above should be included in the manual in a 20pt font in red :). Best regards, Christian -- Riege Software International GmbH Phone: +49 (2159) 91 48 - 0 Mollsfeld 10 Fax : +49 (2159) 91 48 - 11 40670 Meerbusch, Germany http://www.riege.com/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] Replacing JBossMQ
Replacing the JMS provider is a cleaner solution, but if you are looking for a provider that supports XA and ASF then you will have to go with BEA or with an opensource soulution (like JBossMQ or OpenJMS). The project I am working on is heavely based on JMS and we reciently moved to useing MDB to support better transaction interaction with other EJB components. We used to use SwiftMQ, but it does not support ASF or XA, so we just went with JBossMQ for the time being. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Riege Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Replacing JBossMQ hi, On 23 May 2001 10:46:31 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote: I do not believe that SonicMQ supports the optional JMS ASF api, nor XA transactions, which will make implementing MDB very difficult. You might want to use the bridge to a JBossMQ provider for your beans instead. OK, that would be a workable solution for the time being. I was actually thinking along the same lines (i.e. using the JMS Bridge product) but thought that replacing JBossMQ altogether would be a cleaner approach (one less system to take care of/administrate). Thanks a lot for the clarification on this issue, it *is* actually documented in the MDB section of the JBoss manual (under Advanced MDB Configuration) but that section was a bit confusing for me. Probably your statement above should be included in the manual in a 20pt font in red :). Best regards, Christian -- Riege Software International GmbH Phone: +49 (2159) 91 48 - 0 Mollsfeld 10 Fax : +49 (2159) 91 48 - 11 40670 Meerbusch, Germany http://www.riege.com/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
