Passivation happens with SFSBs when you've reached your
resource limit. Doing the passivation in a separate thread
has no effect on performance on a highly loaded system.
Over-engineered, IMHO.
yes clearly but the work was done when no one else would (back in the
2000 days). Simone did it and I am still greateful for it. But by all
means simplify it.
BTW, I'm reinstituting entity pooling too.
ok, curious about why.
marcf
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development