Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-05 Thread Ole Husgaard

Ignacio Coloma wrote:
 You can document it as a bug on Sun. If it really is, they can confirm it.
 Only take care of NOT SPEAKING ABOUT any imaginary patch :)

Sun doesn't mind patches to the java.* libraries when
commmitting bug reports.
The also dont mind it for the purpose of internal research.

But they don't want patched Java libraries floating around
the net, as it violates the _one Java_ principle.

If we started redistributing CGJs patch with JBoss, I think
SUN would ask us to stop that. If he included it with a bug
report to them, I think they would like it.


Best Regards,

Ole Husgaard.

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-04 Thread Ignacio Coloma

You can document it as a bug on Sun. If it really is, they can confirm it.
Only take care of NOT SPEAKING ABOUT any imaginary patch :)

 -Mensaje original-
 De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jung
 , Dr. Christoph
 Enviado el: jueves, 04 de octubre de 2001 9:06
 Para: Jboss-Development (E-Mail)
 Asunto: AW: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader


 Hi Ole  others,

 IMHO, your nice patch has partly solved the problem, i.e., the issue that
 Sacha was noticing with the patch.jar NOT;-) applied. And even without
 patch.jar, it should have greatly diminished the deadlock
 possibilities ...
 But nevertheless, I could imagine a scenario, where a synchronized
 java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal() would lead to hang-ups:

 ServiceLibrary contains two classloaders CL1 and CL2.

 CL1 has class C1 and needs to loadClassInternal(C2) in Thread T1.
 CL2 has Class C2 and needs to loadClassInternal(C1) in Thread T2.

 Then there is certainly a constellation where both threads concurrently
 enter the classloaders, obtaining the respective CL locks and the
 ServiceLibrary code mutually dispatching them will block.

 Is that a valid scenario?

 CGJ

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Ole Husgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2001 20:30
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader


 Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
 
  I must correct myself! We have a principle problem, unfortunately, for
 which
  I do not
  have an immediate answer right now:
 
  Actually, instead of synchronized(classLoaders) in
 ServiceLibraries, there
  would be the need
  to *atomically* synchronize on all instances of the set in order  not to
  interfere with the ClassLoader.loadClassInternally() calls.
 
  But this is not possible with the Java synchronization mechanism, AFAIK.

 Please forgive me if I am wrong - I'm not very familiar
 with this code.

 But isn't the only reason for synchronizing on classLoaders
 that there would be problems if another thread tries to
 add or remove classloaders while the Set is traversed?

 If this is the case, couldn't we avoid synchronizing on it
 by making ServiceLibraries.addClassLoader() and
 removeClassloader() create an entire new Set?

 Of course, then these methods would have to be synchronized,
 and we would probably also have to synchronize on the
 instance variables classes, resources, clToClassSetMap and
 clToResourceSetMap, but these locks would not be held
 while ClassLoader.loadClassInternally() is called.


 Best Regards,

 Ole Husgaard.

 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-02 Thread Ole Husgaard

Hi,

I think this bug is the reason for the problems
we see with the automated tests.
Here the test count sometimes gets very low due
to the tests timing out.

Looking into this is hard, as it seems to change
with every run, but one thing seems to be common:
The deployer stops working, and the timeouts
happen because all attempts at deploying beans
hang with a stack trace like:

RMI TCP Connection(3)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x82a5a20 nid=0x5876
waiting for monitor entry [0xbc7fe000..0xbc7ff8c4]
at
org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:349)
at
org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeployer.java:473)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
at
org.jboss.jmx.connector.rmi.RMIConnectorImpl.invoke(RMIConnectorImpl.java:400)
at [snip]

But I think this monitor is held by another thread
that appears hung with a stack trace like:

RMI TCP Connection(2)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x822fc68 nid=0x5813
waiting for monitor entry [0xbdffe000..0xbdfff8c4]
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:286)
at
org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClassLocally(URLClassLoader.java:163)
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:292)
at
org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:253)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:313)
at java.lang.Class.getMethods0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.getMethods(Class.java:742)
at
org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.verifyEntityHome(EJBVerifier11.java:762)
at
org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.checkEntity(EJBVerifier11.java:121)
at org.jboss.verifier.BeanVerifier.verify(BeanVerifier.java:135)
at
org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:445)
at
org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:374)
at
org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeployer.java:473)
at
org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
at [snip]

In this test run, I started the tests a little early:
After server startup was finished, but before the
autodeployer was done deploying the default rars.
Here the autodeployer seems to hang with the following
stack trace:

AutoDeployer prio=1 tid=0x48d8c090 nid=0x5816 waiting for monitor
entry [0xbc3fe000..0xbc3ff8c4]
at
org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:278)
at
org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
at
org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:151)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:313)
at
org.jboss.deployment.DeployerMBeanSupport.recursiveUnpack(DeployerMBeanSupport.java:551)
at org.jboss.resource.RARDeployer.deploy(RARDeployer.java:166)
at
org.jboss.deployment.DeployerMBeanSupport.deploy(DeployerMBeanSupport.java:117)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1628)
at
com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1523)
at
org.jboss.deployment.AutoDeployer.deploy(AutoDeployer.java:633)
at org.jboss.deployment.AutoDeployer.run(AutoDeployer.java:308)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484)

But even if I wait until the server is fully operational,
I see similar hangs in the test suite.

This is complicated by the facts that:
- kill -SIGQUIT does not give a monitor dump on my
  current SUN JDK 1.3.0 VM.
- The hangs seem completely random. Sometimes the
  entire testsuite runs fine, and hangs at the next
  run if I restart the server. 

RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-02 Thread Bordet, Simone

Hey Ole, 

as I said I have a small tool written with JDI that will tell you who is
holding what and who is waiting (so in the wait for monitor entry you'll
know who is the monitor)
If you wanna play, just tell me ;)

Simon

 -Original Message-
 From: Ole Husgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: martedi 2 ottobre 2001 18:49
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I think this bug is the reason for the problems
 we see with the automated tests.
 Here the test count sometimes gets very low due
 to the tests timing out.
 
 Looking into this is hard, as it seems to change
 with every run, but one thing seems to be common:
 The deployer stops working, and the timeouts
 happen because all attempts at deploying beans
 hang with a stack trace like:
 
 RMI TCP Connection(3)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x82a5a20 
 nid=0x5876
 waiting for monitor entry [0xbc7fe000..0xbc7ff8c4]
 at
 org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:349)
 at
 org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1628)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1523)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeploye
 r.java:473)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1628)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1523)
 at
 org.jboss.jmx.connector.rmi.RMIConnectorImpl.invoke(RMIConnect
 orImpl.java:400)
 at [snip]
 
 But I think this monitor is held by another thread
 that appears hung with a stack trace like:
 
 RMI TCP Connection(2)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x822fc68 
 nid=0x5813
 waiting for monitor entry [0xbdffe000..0xbdfff8c4]
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:286)
 at
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClassLocally(URLClassLoade
 r.java:163)
 at
 org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:292)
 at
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
 at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:253)
 at 
 java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:313)
 at java.lang.Class.getMethods0(Native Method)
 at java.lang.Class.getMethods(Class.java:742)
 at
 org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.verifyEntityHome(EJB
 Verifier11.java:762)
 at
 org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.checkEntity(EJBVerif
 ier11.java:121)
 at 
 org.jboss.verifier.BeanVerifier.verify(BeanVerifier.java:135)
 at
 org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:445)
 at
 org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:374)
 at
 org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1628)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1523)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeploye
 r.java:473)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
 at [snip]
 
 In this test run, I started the tests a little early:
 After server startup was finished, but before the
 autodeployer was done deploying the default rars.
 Here the autodeployer seems to hang with the following
 stack trace:
 
 AutoDeployer prio=1 tid=0x48d8c090 nid=0x5816 waiting for monitor
 entry [0xbc3fe000..0xbc3ff8c4]
 at
 org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:278)
 at
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
 at
 org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:151)
 at 
 java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:313)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.DeployerMBeanSupport.recursiveUnpack(Depl
 oyerMBeanSupport.java:551)
 at org.jboss.resource.RARDeployer.deploy(RARDeployer.java:166)
 at
 org.jboss.deployment.DeployerMBeanSupport.deploy(DeployerMBean
 Support.java:117)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
 at
 com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
 java:1628)
 at
 

RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-02 Thread marc fleury

we though you were dead, totally assimilated...

marcf

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Bordet, Simone
|Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:53 PM
|To: JBoss Development Mailing List (E-mail)
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
|org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader
|
|
|Hey Ole, 
|
|as I said I have a small tool written with JDI that will tell you who is
|holding what and who is waiting (so in the wait for monitor entry you'll
|know who is the monitor)
|If you wanna play, just tell me ;)
|
|Simon
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Ole Husgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: martedi 2 ottobre 2001 18:49
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt:
| org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader
| 
| 
| Hi,
| 
| I think this bug is the reason for the problems
| we see with the automated tests.
| Here the test count sometimes gets very low due
| to the tests timing out.
| 
| Looking into this is hard, as it seems to change
| with every run, but one thing seems to be common:
| The deployer stops working, and the timeouts
| happen because all attempts at deploying beans
| hang with a stack trace like:
| 
| RMI TCP Connection(3)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x82a5a20 
| nid=0x5876
| waiting for monitor entry [0xbc7fe000..0xbc7ff8c4]
| at
| org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:349)
| at
| org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
| at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1628)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1523)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeploye
| r.java:473)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
| at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1628)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1523)
| at
| org.jboss.jmx.connector.rmi.RMIConnectorImpl.invoke(RMIConnect
| orImpl.java:400)
| at [snip]
| 
| But I think this monitor is held by another thread
| that appears hung with a stack trace like:
| 
| RMI TCP Connection(2)-127.0.0.1 daemon prio=1 tid=0x822fc68 
| nid=0x5813
| waiting for monitor entry [0xbdffe000..0xbdfff8c4]
| at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:286)
| at
| org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClassLocally(URLClassLoade
| r.java:163)
| at
| org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:292)
| at
| org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
| at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
| at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:290)
| at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:253)
| at 
| java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:313)
| at java.lang.Class.getMethods0(Native Method)
| at java.lang.Class.getMethods(Class.java:742)
| at
| org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.verifyEntityHome(EJB
| Verifier11.java:762)
| at
| org.jboss.verifier.strategy.EJBVerifier11.checkEntity(EJBVerif
| ier11.java:121)
| at 
| org.jboss.verifier.BeanVerifier.verify(BeanVerifier.java:135)
| at
| org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:445)
| at
| org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:374)
| at
| org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.deploy(ContainerFactory.java:305)
| at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1628)
| at
| com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.
| java:1523)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startModules(J2eeDeployer.java:495)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.startApplication(J2eeDeploye
| r.java:473)
| at
| org.jboss.deployment.J2eeDeployer.deploy(J2eeDeployer.java:209)
| at [snip]
| 
| In this test run, I started the tests a little early:
| After server startup was finished, but before the
| autodeployer was done deploying the default rars.
| Here the autodeployer seems to hang with the following
| stack trace:
| 
| AutoDeployer prio=1 tid=0x48d8c090 nid=0x5816 waiting for monitor
| entry [0xbc3fe000..0xbc3ff8c4]
| at
| org.jboss.system.ServiceLibraries.loadClass(ServiceLibraries.java:278)
| at
| org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:145)
| at
| org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:151)
| at 
| 

Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-02 Thread Ole Husgaard

Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
 
 I must correct myself! We have a principle problem, unfortunately, for which
 I do not
 have an immediate answer right now:
 
 Actually, instead of synchronized(classLoaders) in ServiceLibraries, there
 would be the need
 to *atomically* synchronize on all instances of the set in order  not to
 interfere with the ClassLoader.loadClassInternally() calls.
 
 But this is not possible with the Java synchronization mechanism, AFAIK.

Please forgive me if I am wrong - I'm not very familiar
with this code.

But isn't the only reason for synchronizing on classLoaders
that there would be problems if another thread tries to
add or remove classloaders while the Set is traversed?

If this is the case, couldn't we avoid synchronizing on it
by making ServiceLibraries.addClassLoader() and
removeClassloader() create an entire new Set?

Of course, then these methods would have to be synchronized,
and we would probably also have to synchronize on the
instance variables classes, resources, clToClassSetMap and
clToResourceSetMap, but these locks would not be held
while ClassLoader.loadClassInternally() is called.


Best Regards,

Ole Husgaard.

___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-01 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph

I must correct myself! We have a principle problem, unfortunately, for which
I do not
have an immediate answer right now:

Actually, instead of synchronized(classLoaders) in ServiceLibraries, there
would be the need
to *atomically* synchronize on all instances of the set in order  not to
interfere with the ClassLoader.loadClassInternally() calls. 

But this is not possible with the Java synchronization mechanism, AFAIK. 

Puzzling,
CGJ

(BTW: If somebody would offer Voodoo-puppets of SUN developers in the
jboss-store, you could make a fortune! If you would additionally provide
JBoss-needles, you could even make a bigger one!)


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Oktober 2001 15:04
An: Jung , Dr. Christoph
Betreff: RE: Java Classloaders document


Christoph,

I've just read your answer and as I am not yet up-to-date with the new
JBoss
classloading mechanism, can't be very efficient at commenting your idea...
Consequently, I am very confident in what you suggest ;)

No, in fact, what you suggest seem very very possible. I may try to
synchronize a method from your loading mechanism to see if it solves the
problem. Which part should I synchronize?

Thank you for your very effective help.


___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] The rabbit has a bug in its pelt: org.jboss.system.URLClassLoader

2001-10-01 Thread marc fleury

|(BTW: If somebody would offer Voodoo-puppets of SUN developers in the
|jboss-store, you could make a fortune! If you would additionally provide
|JBoss-needles, you could even make a bigger one!)

LOL ^ 10

listen I really want to finish the website but will try to come back to this
soon (like tonight or tomorrow)

If you feel like getting down...
get down, get down, get down, get down
don't let anybody stop you baby!

marcf

|
|
|-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
|Von: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Gesendet: Montag, 1. Oktober 2001 15:04
|An: Jung , Dr. Christoph
|Betreff: RE: Java Classloaders document
|
|
|Christoph,
|
|I've just read your answer and as I am not yet up-to-date with the new
|JBoss
|classloading mechanism, can't be very efficient at commenting your idea...
|Consequently, I am very confident in what you suggest ;)
|
|No, in fact, what you suggest seem very very possible. I may try to
|synchronize a method from your loading mechanism to see if it solves the
|problem. Which part should I synchronize?
|
|Thank you for your very effective help.
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development