RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Burke
Igor,

I couldn't replicate this.

BUT...I think I may have fixed the problem.  This is probably a relic, but
the Instrumentor code was adding a InvocationTargetException to the throws
clause of every instrumented method.  I have removed this.

Bill

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor
 Fedorenko
 Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:06 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP


  You have read/write correct?
 I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-)

  Javassist may not be creating the correct
  throws clauses.  Can you add a test for this under the
  testsuite and under
  aop/?  I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
 Done. Added .../aop/simpleejb/SimpleBean.java EJB,
 SimpleBeanInterceptor/Factory that intercepts SimpleBean methods
 and SimpleBeanUnitTestCase that fails to deploy that EJB. Note
 that the same EJB can be deployed successfully without interceptors.

 Btw, is there a separate target for running AOP unit tests? I had
 to run run-db-tests which seems to be too wide.

 
  Bill
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Behalf Of Igor
   Fedorenko
   Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:44 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)
   Subject: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
  
  
   Hi,
  
   I am playing around with AOP and I want to know if I am doing
   something wrong. What I basically want is to add additional
   behaviour to an EJB implementation. The problem is, deployment of
   EJB fails with verifier errors (violation of sections 7.10.6,
   7.10.7 and 7.10.8, something about exceptions thrown by
   implementation not being matched by declared by home/remote
   interfaces). The very same EJB deploys fine without
  aspects. Any idea?


 ---
 This SF.net email is sponsored by:
 The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
 NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
 http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-31 Thread Adrian Brock
Hi Bill,

I changed the ejb verifier to allow InvocationTargetException.
I'll disallow it again :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:24 -0500
Igor,

I couldn't replicate this.

BUT...I think I may have fixed the problem.  This is probably a relic, but
the Instrumentor code was adding a InvocationTargetException to the throws
clause of every instrumented method.  I have removed this.
Bill

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor
 Fedorenko
 Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:06 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP


  You have read/write correct?
 I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-)

  Javassist may not be creating the correct
  throws clauses.  Can you add a test for this under the
  testsuite and under
  aop/?  I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
 Done. Added .../aop/simpleejb/SimpleBean.java EJB,
 SimpleBeanInterceptor/Factory that intercepts SimpleBean methods
 and SimpleBeanUnitTestCase that fails to deploy that EJB. Note
 that the same EJB can be deployed successfully without interceptors.

 Btw, is there a separate target for running AOP unit tests? I had
 to run run-db-tests which seems to be too wide.

 
  Bill
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Behalf Of Igor
   Fedorenko
   Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:44 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)
   Subject: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
  
  
   Hi,
  
   I am playing around with AOP and I want to know if I am doing
   something wrong. What I basically want is to add additional
   behaviour to an EJB implementation. The problem is, deployment of
   EJB fails with verifier errors (violation of sections 7.10.6,
   7.10.7 and 7.10.8, something about exceptions thrown by
   implementation not being matched by declared by home/remote
   interfaces). The very same EJB deploys fine without
  aspects. Any idea?


 ---
 This SF.net email is sponsored by:
 The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
 NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
 http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP

2003-03-26 Thread Igor Fedorenko
 You have read/write correct?  
I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-)

 Javassist may not be creating the correct
 throws clauses.  Can you add a test for this under the 
 testsuite and under
 aop/?  I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
Done. Added .../aop/simpleejb/SimpleBean.java EJB, SimpleBeanInterceptor/Factory that 
intercepts SimpleBean methods and SimpleBeanUnitTestCase that fails to deploy that 
EJB. Note that the same EJB can be deployed successfully without interceptors.

Btw, is there a separate target for running AOP unit tests? I had to run run-db-tests 
which seems to be too wide.

 
 Bill
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Behalf Of Igor
  Fedorenko
  Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:44 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)
  Subject: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
 
 
  Hi,
 
  I am playing around with AOP and I want to know if I am doing
  something wrong. What I basically want is to add additional
  behaviour to an EJB implementation. The problem is, deployment of
  EJB fails with verifier errors (violation of sections 7.10.6,
  7.10.7 and 7.10.8, something about exceptions thrown by
  implementation not being matched by declared by home/remote
  interfaces). The very same EJB deploys fine without 
 aspects. Any idea?


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development