[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Shared objects in cluster
I have a running JBoss 4.2.3.GA cluster running. My application, not originally designed for a cluster, has some Singleton objects that hold in memory code tables. This tables rarely change, but when they do, I need to update the whole cluster. Since moving to the cluster I face the problem that when such a change occurs it only occurs on the node which it was done on and the other nodes are not aware. I need to redesign these objects. It seems the best solution is to keep these code tables in a shared cache, i.e. the treecahce used by the cluster. 1. Can some one direct me to a code example on how this is done in a cluster. 2. Does anyone think I should use a different solution for this problem? Thnx View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4227053#4227053 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4227053 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Wierd Problem in Hibernate session
I have to following code:
| protected TaskInstance locateTask(ContextInstance ctx, JbpmContext
jbpmContext) throws ApplicationException {
| String searchValue = (String) ctx.getVariable(contextKey);
| if (searchValue == null || searchValue.trim().equals())
| return null;
| String query = String.format(select t.ID_ TASK_ID from
JBPM_TASKINSTANCE t , JBPM_VARIABLEINSTANCE vi
| + where vi.STRINGVALUE_ = '%s' and vi.TOKEN_ =
t.TOKEN_ and (t.ISOPEN_ = 1 or t.ISSUSPENDED_ = 1)
| + and t.END_ is null and t.NAME_ , new
Object[] {searchValue});
|
| String inString;
| if (!notInTaskType) {
| inString = String.format(in ( %s ), new Object[]
{taskName});
| }
| else {
| // we're looking for tasks which are not of types given
| inString = String.format(not in ( %s ), new Object[]
{taskName});
| }
|
| query += inString;
|
| SQLQuery sqlQuery =
jbpmContext.getSession().createSQLQuery(query).addScalar(TASK_ID,
Hibernate.LONG);
| List result = sqlQuery.list();
| // CollectionDbaseFieldList result =
JDBCHelper.getInstance().runSelectStatement(query,
| // (Connection)
ctx.getTransientVariable(FlowVariables.CONNECTION));
| if (result == null || result.isEmpty()) {
| return null;
| }
| // always take the first one found! usually there should be
only one task in existence
| // long taskId =
Long.parseLong(result.iterator().next().get(ID_).getValueAsString());
| Long taskId = (Long) result.get(0);
| if (logger.isLoggable(Level.FINEST))
| logger.finest(Found a Task with ID: + taskId);
| TaskInstance task;
| try {
| task = TaskManager.loadInstance(taskId, jbpmContext);
| if (logger.isLoggable(Level.FINEST))
| logger.finest(task.toString());
| }
| catch (ApplicationException ae) {
| // the task is either being opened by a user of is
being finished by a user.
| Long userId = (Long)
ctx.getTransientVariable(FlowVariables.USER_ID);
| if (userId != null) {
| String folderId = (String)
ctx.getVariable(FlowVariables.FOLDER_ID);
| String text =
ServerSideResources.translate(Msg38) + + folderId;
| SetString users = new HashSetString();
| users.add(userId.toString());
|
MessageManager.getInstance().sendMessageToUsers(users, text);
| }
| return null;
| }
| return task;
| }
|
| public static EmiTaskInstance loadInstance(long taskId, JbpmContext ctx)
throws ApplicationException {
| EmiTaskMgmntSession mgmtSession = (EmiTaskMgmntSession)
ctx.getTaskMgmtSession();
| try {
| return (EmiTaskInstance)
mgmtSession.loadTaskInstance(taskId);
| }
| catch (JbpmException e) {
| throw new ApplicationException(ALREADY_ASSIGNED,
e.getMessage());
| }
| }
|
|
In one process I call a subprocess. Before the subprocess is called I run an
action which closes a Task (Hence Task A). At the beginning of the subprocess I
run an action which runs the locateTask from above to locate open tasks that
have a certain value. The select I run using the open hibernate session returns
finding Task A although Task A is closed i.e has an end date, and is not marked
as open or suspended. More over, on the next couple of lines of code I load the
task with the id the select returned and try to resume it, this fails on
exception that says I can't resume a task that has been closed. How can the
select find this task if it closed?
I'm running a Jbpm 3.2 in a clustered environment, which means I'm using an XA
DataSource and XA transactions. A Transaction is opened before I begin and the
commit is only after The subprocess has reached a blocking state.
The only thing I can think of is that for some reason the connection used for
the query is not the connection used for loading and closing the task. I also
want to mention that the same exact code does not fail in a non clusterd
environment.
I'll be happy to read any thoughts on this matter that can point me to a
direction
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196209#4196209
Reply to the
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Wierd Problem in Hibernate session
I wish I could recall this issue... It is my mistake. The environment which had this working had a different process running which did not run the locateTask code and thus did not fail. This through me off and caused the question. However, once I found out this difference I realized that when running within the same session, changes done to persistent objects will not show up in regular selects. I changed my query to an HQL query and everything is working fine. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4196280#4196280 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4196280 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Best locking strategy
I have an existing ejb 2.1 application which I now moved to clustering. If I understand the documentation correctly 2.1 entities are not shared on the cluster through a common cache. This means that if two users running on two different nodes are working on the same database row through an entity bean they may corrupt the data? If so, I tried to use row-locking on the entity which creates a SELECT FOR UPDATE... queries on the db and thus locks the row when a transaction is working on it. But with this I have problems on ejb queries that use DISTINCT, MAX, MIN or SUM and since I have such queries it does not look like a good solution. Can someone please help here on what is the best strategy? Should I try to use optimistic locking on all beans? Did I understand the documentation wrong? THX View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4194325#4194325 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4194325 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is this a bug or is it intentional
I agree both scanarios should be addressed. Addressing the interface issue is not hard as we can do type.isInterface() However this leaves two problems. Both are not common. use cases. 1. Abstract classes which if someone uses it is imposible to get it to work, since it will fail on 'Field.set'. 2. Another problem is when a user uses his own sub interface. I think the code should address the first two issues and state in the documentation not to use abstract classes or sub interfaces of Collection, Set, List and Map for field mapping. (Maybe add an clear exception message) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4159483#4159483 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4159483 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Is this a bug or is it intentional
I'm running jbpm 3.1.1 on my site for a long time. Today I tried to see what I
need to do in order to upgrade to 3.2.3. Aside from migrating the DB, I found
several things. One of the things is something I submitted a jira issue
jbpm-696 (which was accepted as a fix and closed).
In FieldInstantiator line 140 - 141:
else if (Map.class.isAssignableFrom(type)) {
| value = getMap(propertyElement, new HashMap());
This makes the developer of an actionHandler use only the HashMap type as his
map type, otherwise if you use hashtable you won't be able to set it. What I
suggested back on that fix (applies also to collection types) is to write the
code like this:
else if (Map.class.isAssignableFrom(type)) {
| value = getMap(propertyElement, (Map)type.newInstance());
this allows the developer to use any kind of map type even his own
implementation.
My question is: Is it intentional not to allow other map or collection types or
is it just an oversight?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4159345#4159345
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4159345
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Assigning Taks to the same user when sent back
A swimlane, as fas as I understand, will keep the same actor. If TASK B is for a different actor then a swimlane will not solve this. What we did was to extend the taskInstance with our own object that keeps the information on the former actors on the task (Tasks can also be reassigned so you need to keep as fas history as needed). Then we used a Task Assignement Handler that checks for a flag to restore the former actor. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4126468#4126468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4126468 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - memory leak in delegation???
We are using JBpm 3.1.1 on a big insurance application. We are having memory problems. After using a profiler we have seen that for some reason all our actionHandlers(delegations) do not clean from memory. Since these actions are basically stateless it strikes me as odd. When a process is running it creates actionHandlers, these handlers don't clean up after the process has ended, they just stay in memory for ever. Before I start dumping information here please advice... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4106830#4106830 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4106830 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - JbpmTaskInstance not released from memory
I have an enterprise application running with Jbpm 3.1.1. I have recently done some profiling work on it and encountered something I can't explain. Every TaskInsatnce which I get by calling getTaskList on the taskMgmntSession is never released from memory. So I'm wondering who is holding these references and why? If it is some kind of cache why don't I get the same instances when I call the same list? Any how I'd appreciate any ideas on this issue and how to expore it. Since in our enterprise system where people get hundreds of tasks a day and we have over a 100 users the memory will klog up rather quickly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045494#4045494 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045494 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: JbpmTaskInstance not released from memory
Found my problem. Somehwere along the line I didn't release the context, everytime I got the new Tasks I created a new context. The former context was still holding references to the old list and this is why id didn't get cleared by the GC. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045592#4045592 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045592 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: stack size limit
I was able to run with the following configuration: | # Setup JBoss sepecific properties | JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -XX:ThreadStackSize=128 -Xmx3072m -Xms1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m | | # setup java temporary disk space | JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -Djava.io.tmpdir=/appdata/jboss/tmp | | # the running program | JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360 | JAVA_OPTS=$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+UseParallelGC -Dprogram.name=$PROGNAME | It seems that I needed to omit tje 'k' after 128. However when I copied these same setting to my production server Jboss failed to load the application at all: Here is what I get: | Could not create deployment: file:/appdata/jboss/jboss-4.0.3 | SP1/server/amit/deploy/jboss-bean.deployer/ | org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Unexpected error during load of: org.jboss.kernel.deployment.jboss.JBossBeanDeployer | , msg=org/jboss/kernel/deployment/jboss/JBossBeanDeployerMBean; - nested throwable: (java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Unexpec | ted error during load of: org.jboss.kernel.deployment.jboss.JBossBeanDeployer, msg=org/jboss/kernel/deployment/jboss/JBossBean | DeployerMBean) | and it goes on Jboss is reporting on problems with claa loading, however when I take the new settings off it works fine. Both the production and Test are the same Solaris OS, same JDK, running the same application server settings and version. What could be causing this, where do you think I should look for differences? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038428#4038428 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038428 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - stack size limit
I've been reading through the posts here. I saw that it was recommended in many places to do the following setting on solaris: | -XX:ThreadStackSize=128k | So I did it! But when I ran it I got an error stating that this new setting of 131072 Kb exceeds the exiting limit of 8192 kB. When I changed the limit to 131072 I got a different error stating: | Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread | at java.lang.Thread.start(Native Method) | at org.jboss.Main.main(Main.java:450) | can someone please shed some light. If my original limit is smaller and my application works (although I do have performance problems) Do I still have to change this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037838#4037838 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037838 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: stack size limit
according to man pages changing the stack limit (which is what I did using ulimit -s) is what controlls the number of threads per process. so, I guess my problem lies elswhere. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4038071#4038071 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4038071 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - please suggest a startegy
I have a web application running on JBoss 4.0.3SP1 on a sun sparc with 2 processors. Some of my processes are running asynchronously doing alot of transactions with the DB. When these processes are running the CPU is working real heavy and the users suffer from a slowdown. Is there a JBoss setup that would utilize both CPUs. When I look at the machine I see only one is used for Jboss. Should I run two instances of Jboss one on each CPU and create some clustering between them? What the best way to approch this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037095#4037095 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037095 ___ jboss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: db connection leak some advice please
OK. Done alot of investigation but still have a problem. Here is what I got: first, I saw that my jbmp.configuration has no effect. i.e to have no transaction support by hibernate i had | service name='persistence' factory='org.jbpm.persistence.db.DbPersistenceServiceFactory' | field name=isTransactionEnabledfalse //field | /service | this did not actually load the attribute what i should have had is this: | service name='persistence' | factory | bean class='com.emi.framework.infrastructure.workflow.EmiDbPersistanceServiceFactory' | field name=isTransactionEnabledfalse //field | /bean | /factory | /service | Now the transaction is managed by Jboss App Server and not hibernate. Still there is a problem. Here is what I do: 1. user clicks on a link on a web page. 2. A UserTransaction is opened 3. JbpmContext is created (JbpmConfiguration.getInstance().createJbpmContext() 4. TaskMgmntSesion is received and a taskInstance is loaded. 5. ContextInstance is received from the task 6. processinstance is received from context 7. the process is signaled. 8. Action are run and the process foloows to the next state. 9 return from signal to method 10. commit transaction 11. JbpmContext is closed After lots of investigation I know the following: 1. the connection is opened by Jbpm in the LoadTaskInstance 2. this connection is not on the hiberanteSession, jdbcContext, ConnectionManager 3. I could not find it anywhere, so I can not close it. 4. This connection is not closed and stays open even though transaction is committed or rolledback. 5. Since this connection is nowhere to be found I can't close it. This causes the connection pool to run out very quickly. Need help ASAP THNX View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009746#4009746 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4009746 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: db connection leak some advice please
I tried as you suggested and commented the flush and release mode and uncommented the transaction factory. Nothing is changed. I want to emphasize that everything gets committed or rolledback as it should. My only problem is that the connection is never closed, thus it is never returned to the ManagedConnectionPool. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009866#4009866 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4009866 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - db connection leak some advice please
I have recently deployed a large jbpm application. This is actually an
extension to a J2ee application which has been running for two years. Since
this deployment my system exhausted the connection pool every few hours. It
looks like JBPM is responsible (or rather me misusing it)
Anyhow, I read somewhere that not closing JbpmContext could be the reason for
this problem. However, I'm running most of my jbpm calls from code that does
other things and which uses a UserTransaction (I'm working with ejb 2.0 on
jboss4.0.3Sp1). If I try to close the context it complains I can't commit when
autocommit is set!, so basically I commit my userTransaction and don't close
the JbpmContext.
Here are my configuration files:
| hibernate-configuration
| session-factory
|
|
| !-- Datasource configuration --
| property
name=hibernate.dialectorg.hibernate.dialect.Oracle9Dialect/property
| property
name=hibernate.connection.datasourcejava:/OracleDS/property
| property name=hibernate.show_sqlfalse/property
| property name=hibernate.format_sqlfalse/property
| !--
| property
name=hibernate.transaction.factory_classorg.hibernate.transaction.JTATransactionFactory/property
| --
| property
name=hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_classorg.hibernate.transaction.JBossTransactionManagerLookup/property
| property
name=hibernate.connection.release_modeafter_statement/property
| !--
| property
name=hibernate.transaction.auto_close_sessiontrue/property
| --
| property
name=hibernate.transaction.flush_before_completiontrue/property
|
| !-- other hibernate properties
| property name=hibernate.show_sqltrue/property
| property name=hibernate.format_sqltrue/property
| --
|
and jbpmConfig:
| jbpm-configuration
|
| jbpm-context
| service name='persistence'
factory='org.jbpm.persistence.db.DbPersistenceServiceFactory'
| field name=isTransactionEnabledfalse //field
| /service
| service name='message'
factory='org.jbpm.msg.db.DbMessageServiceFactory' /
| !-- service name='scheduler'
factory='org.jbpm.scheduler.db.DbSchedulerServiceFactory' /--
| service name='logging'
factory='org.jbpm.logging.db.DbLoggingServiceFactory' /
| !-- service name='authentication'
factory='org.jbpm.security.authentication.DefaultAuthenticationServiceFactory'
/--
| /jbpm-context
|
| !-- configuration resource files pointing to default configuration files
in jbpm-{version}.jar --
| string name='resource.hibernate.cfg.xml' value='hibernate.cfg.xml' /
| !-- string name='resource.hibernate.properties'
value='hibernate.properties' / --
| string name='resource.business.calendar'
value='org/jbpm/calendar/jbpm.business.calendar.properties' /
| string name='resource.default.modules'
value='org/jbpm/graph/def/jbpm.default.modules.properties' /
| string name='resource.converter'
value='org/jbpm/db/hibernate/jbpm.converter.properties' /
| string name='resource.action.types'
value='org/jbpm/graph/action/action.types.xml' /
| string name='resource.node.types'
value='org/jbpm/graph/node/node.types.xml' /
| string name='resource.parsers'
value='org/jbpm/jpdl/par/jbpm.parsers.xml' /
| string name='resource.varmapping'
value='org/jbpm/context/exe/jbpm.varmapping.xml' /
|
| bean name='jbpm.task.instance.factory'
class='com.emi.framework.infrastructure.workflow.TaskInstanceFactory'
singleton='true' /
| bean name='jbpm.variable.resolver'
class='org.jbpm.jpdl.el.impl.JbpmVariableResolver' singleton='true' /
| long name='jbpm.msg.wait.timout' value='5000' singleton='true' /
|
| /jbpm-configuration
|
can someone shed a light?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4007598#4007598
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4007598
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - startegy for enhancing TaskInstance
I've created a class that extends TaskInstance. I've created an enhancment table for it (thought it should be better this way) and done the hbm.xml stuff. The extension was OK and I was able to create a task. However, I now have these problems. if I load a task using the JbpmContext (which I need to do) it will load a\the regular TaskInstance Object and I will not have access to my new fields. The same goes for all the finder queries, it seems I have to reqrite them all to fit my new extension class. 1. Is there a strategy to extend TaskInstance that will let me have new fields without changing stuff in Jbpm core? 2. Is there a way to just get the hibernate session used for task Managment and use my own class for quereing and loading? 3. If not 1, 2, it seems logical that I will need to use my own new queries for finding tasks. however I do think JbpmContext should be fixed to load the class used by the TaskInstanceFactory, and not the default TaskInstance. Thnx View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3978276#3978276 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3978276 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Eclipse IDE (users)] - Re: jboss IDE 2.0.0- server doesn't take my login - config
I just checked and I have the exact issue with 1.6.1GA. I forgot to mention I'm not using the default configuration, I use myu own copnfiguration. When I start from command line I do: run -c amit I chose the 'amit' configuration for the server both in 2.0.0 and 1.6.1 The server loads, but when I do my first query with the datasource I get an exception: | 09:04:46,906 ERROR [[/amit]] StandardWrapper.Throwable | java.lang.SecurityException: Invalid authentication attempt, principal=null | at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.getSubject(BaseConnectionManager2.java:665) | at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.allocateConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:461) | at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2$ConnectionManagerProxy.allocateConnection(BaseConnection | Manager2.java:894) | at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrapperDataSource.getConnection(WrapperDataSource.java:73) | at com.emi.framework.infrastructure.jdbc.JDBCHelper.runSelectStatementSimple(JDBCHelper.java:194) | at com.emi.framework.infrastructure.jdbc.JDBCHelper.runSelectStatement(JDBCHelper.java:422) | at com.emi.framework.client.utils.fieldLimits.FieldLimitCache.init(FieldLimitCache.java:38) | at com.emi.framework.client.actions.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:64) | at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1091) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(StandardWrapper.java:925) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.loadOnStartup(StandardContext.java:3857) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4118) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:759) | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:739) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:524) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) | at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) | at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) | at org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean.invoke(BaseModelMBean.java:503) | at org.jboss.mx.server.RawDynamicInvoker.invoke(RawDynamicInvoker.java:150) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644) | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.init(StandardContext.java:5005) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) | at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) | at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) | at org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean.invoke(BaseModelMBean.java:503) | at org.jboss.mx.server.RawDynamicInvoker.invoke(RawDynamicInvoker.java:150) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc5.TomcatDeployer.performDeployInternal(TomcatDeployer.java:280) | at org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc5.TomcatDeployer.performDeploy(TomcatDeployer.java:88) | at org.jboss.web.AbstractWebDeployer.start(AbstractWebDeployer.java:357) | at org.jboss.web.WebModule.startModule(WebModule.java:68) | at org.jboss.web.WebModule.startService(WebModule.java:46) | at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalStart(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:274) | at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalLifecycle(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:230) | at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor18.invoke(Unknown Source) | at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) | at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) | at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:141) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80) | at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:72) | at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:245) | at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644) | at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:943) | at $Proxy0.start(Unknown Source) | at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:428) | at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source) | at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) | at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) | at
[jboss-user] [JBoss Eclipse IDE (users)] - jboss IDE 2.0.0- server doesn't take my login - config
I configured my jboss 4.0.3Sp1 server to run in the ide. This server runs perfectly from command line. However when I run it from the server and deploy my application it fails on DB connectivity. My datasource connects using a login configuration in the conf directory's login-config.xml which holds my user and encrypted password. The server is unable to connect to the DB. Is there a way to config this, have I configured it wrong, or is this some knd of problem with the IDE. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3966342#3966342 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3966342 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - invoking code from an ear file
I'm trying to integrate JBpm into an existing j2ee application running on Jboss in it's own ear. I'm using Jbpm as a service. I need to write actions that do things directly in the application like invoking some processes, beans and such. The problem is that Jbpm.sar does not see my ear file in it's class path, and thus I get the class not found exceptions. I've read the stuff about classloading in jboss, however I couldn't find how its done in practice, adding the ear file into Jbpm service classpath. thnx View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3958341#3958341 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3958341 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
