I just noticed the same thing yesterday. Also, it imported a class
(the same class, in you instance it would be class A) as well. I
don't know what that was about. I figured I just hit a wrong key
combination, but maybe not..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I find C-c C-v C-y excellent and find myself using it more and more, but
occasionally have this odd behavoir:
Point is in class A like so:
public class A {
...
new X().--|--someMethod()
...
}
and I hit C-c C-v C-y. I get the dialog:
===
Which class?
(*) java.lang.Object
( ) org.omg.CORBA.Object
( ) com.inprise.vbroker.CORBA.Object
( ) org.omg.CORBA.Object
[Ok] [Cancel]
===
At the same time JDE loads class X in the other window. If I select
Ok
or Cancel we stop there and the cursor rests at:
public class X--|-- extends Y { ...
Actually class Y, which as you can see is the super of X, implements
the method. And if I then go back to the original point and redo C-c C-v
C-y the screen splits and in one I have class X (again!) and in the
other
class Y with point correctly placed after the method name.
IMHO class X is a red herring and should not be loaded at all!
Also, I can repeat this double-attempt sequence over and over with the
same result, so JDE apparently does not learn where the method is
defined.
Does anybody else also have this?
Thanks,
Maurice
Maurice Nicholson
Senior Analyst Programmer
SITA Advanced Travel Solutions
Tel: +44 (0) 1483 414411
Fax: +44 (0) 1483 414122
Direct: +44 (0) 1483 521294
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately and delete it from your system. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient
is prohibited. The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail message
are the author's own and may not reflect the views and opinions of SITA.
