Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Sander Devrieze wrote: > Op vrijdag 11 augustus 2006 17:43, schreef Florian Holzhauer: > >> This is for sure no academic research whatsoever, it is more a bit of >> "Hacking perl scripts in the morning while waiting for the coffee >> maker to finish" research -- no doubt about that. > > Maybe you can register the domain jabbercraft.com to make something like > netcraft.com? :o) > Well hopefully we can make xmpp.net into something like that. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Op vrijdag 11 augustus 2006 17:43, schreef Florian Holzhauer: > This is for sure no academic research whatsoever, it is more a bit of > "Hacking perl scripts in the morning while waiting for the coffee > maker to finish" research -- no doubt about that. Maybe you can register the domain jabbercraft.com to make something like netcraft.com? :o) -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ejabberd, the expandable Jabber daemon. -- http://ejabberd.jabber.ru/
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Maciek Niedzielski schrieb: Do virtual-hosted domains always resolve to the same IP number? Maybe this could help to eliminate the duplicates. No ... e.g. amessage runs on three different domains. Tot kijk Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Florian Holzhauer wrote: > If you have any suggestions about improving such stats, I would love > to hear them. Do virtual-hosted domains always resolve to the same IP number? Maybe this could help to eliminate the duplicates. -- Maciek A: It's against natural order of reading. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: Why is that? xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A: People answering above quoted text. Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Hi Lucas, on Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > just fyi: I sent today a jabber:iq:version query to all Jabber-Servers > > and -Components which appeared in the s2s-Logs of jabber.ccc.de during > > the last hours, 542 in total, to figure out the popularity of the > > different jabberd implementations and gateway distribution. Here are > > some rough rundowns: > > Note that there could be a bias in your stats due to virtual hosting. Yes, sure. To be precise: I am very well aware about that fact, for example are there several of the amessage-domains in my list. There are several other reasons for a bias in my stats, like for example the fact that I compiled the list of the servers to query just using one single jabberd. This is for sure no academic research whatsoever, it is more a bit of "Hacking perl scripts in the morning while waiting for the coffee maker to finish" research -- no doubt about that. However, I considered the results interesting, at least to give some hints about the distribution of the jabberds. If you have any suggestions about improving such stats, I would love to hear them. Florian. -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
On 11/08/06 at 13:21 +0200, Florian Holzhauer wrote: > Hi List, > > just fyi: I sent today a jabber:iq:version query to all Jabber-Servers > and -Components which appeared in the s2s-Logs of jabber.ccc.de during > the last hours, 542 in total, to figure out the popularity of the > different jabberd implementations and gateway distribution. Here are > some rough rundowns: Note that there could be a bias in your stats due to virtual hosting. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Re: [jdev] Server Usage Statistics
Just tell me why (more important) half of my message disappeared and why the remaining part got broken... > jsm => 20 (I guess this is pre-1.4.3 jabberd1) This can be something else, too. Like wpjabberd. I know admins who run wpjabberd with jabberd1's jsm, and who run jabberd1 with wpjabberd's one. -- Maciek A: It's against natural order of reading. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: Why is that? xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] A: People answering above quoted text. Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
