[JIRA] (JENKINS-43546) Facing problem when integrating Blue Ocean with Bitbucket

2018-11-08 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble assigned an issue to James Dumay  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-43546  
 
 
  Facing problem when integrating Blue Ocean with Bitbucket   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Joshua Noble  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Joshua Noble James Dumay  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-43546) Facing problem when integrating Blue Ocean with Bitbucket

2018-11-08 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble assigned an issue to Joshua Noble  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-43546  
 
 
  Facing problem when integrating Blue Ocean with Bitbucket   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Joshua Noble  
 
 
Assignee: 
 James Dumay Joshua Noble  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-47823) withMaven fails to inject Maven settings files with docker-pipeline 1.14

2018-10-31 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-47823  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: withMaven fails to inject Maven settings files with docker-pipeline 1.14   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Josh Trow I know it's been a year, but I came up with a workaround for not having to update every mvn call here: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-40484?focusedCommentId=352635=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-352635  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-40484) Unable to use withMaven() step inside docker container for old versions of Docker

2018-10-31 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-40484  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to use withMaven() step inside docker container for old versions of Docker   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I spent a good amount of time looking into this and came up with an acceptable workaround that works for my team. We have hundreds of branches across hundreds of repos, so updating all of the Java/Maven related Jenkinsfiles (on every branch) to use $MVN_CMD instead of "mvn" was not going to happen anytime soon. We also had several pending plugin updates, many of which required the latest version of the pipeline-maven plugin. In our case, we have a private internal Docker image that we use for all maven builds. It's forked off the official Docker Hub Maven image and includes a few additional tools and packages that we need. What I ended up doing was creating a bash script that simply wraps the "mvn" command and checks for existence of $MVN_CMD. If $MVN_CMD exists, it calls that and passes along the same parameters. If $MVN_CMD doesn't exist, it simply calls the real maven binary located at /usr/bin/mvn. This bash script lives at /usr/local/bin/mvn, which exists in our $PATH before the real maven binary, which is /usr/bin/mvn. Simply create a bash script like below, and ensure it has execute permissions: (chmod +x mvn.sh)  

 

#!/bin/bash

if [[ -v MVN_CMD ]]; then
  $MVN_CMD "$@"
else
  /usr/bin/mvn "$@"
fi
 

 Then inside of your Dockerfile, add the following instruction: 

 

COPY mvn.sh /usr/local/bin/mvn
 

 This has been tested with the maven:3.5.3-jdk-8 Docker image.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-37491) Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes

2018-04-23 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-37491  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I can confirm that setting up the Basic Branch Build Strategies plugin and selecting Regular Branches and Change Requests (with Ignore rebuilding merge branches checked) indeed gives us exactly what we want. Thanks for the tip!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-40484) Unable to use withMaven() step inside docker container for old versions of Docker

2018-04-19 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-40484  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unable to use withMaven() step inside docker container for old versions of Docker   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Any updates on this?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-35988) Equivalent to polling commit exclusions for branch indexing

2018-03-29 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-35988  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Equivalent to polling commit exclusions for branch indexing   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'm also looking for a way to exclude/ignore commits from a specific Git author. For example, an automated user who bumps the package.json version of an npm module. If that automated user pushes back to the repository after a build, that push will trigger yet another build. Is there a way to ignore/filter out events from certain commit authors? From what I can tell, the webhook events from GitHub include commit author information when a push occurs.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-16 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble edited a comment on  JENKINS-42519  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Isn't the whole point of a multibranch pipeline  (within the context of the GitHub Branch Source plugin)  to build multiple branches of the same origin? I don't see how adding multiple origins is a valid example.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-16 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-42519  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Isn't the whole point of a multibranch pipeline to build multiple branches of the same origin? I don't see how adding multiple origins is a valid example.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-37491) Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes

2018-03-15 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble edited a comment on  JENKINS-37491  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'm also now seeing build storms from this issue.One can turn off "Periodically if not otherwise run" to prevent the storms, but then you're left with orphaned jobs being left behind when a branch is deleted. Therefore, if one tries to use the branch source plugin, they either have to deal with build storms, or with orphaned jobs. I don't think I saw this issue back when the core functionality existed in the GitHub Organization Folders plugin. Perhaps this is a regression?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-37491) Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes

2018-03-15 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-37491  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Build Origin PRs (merge with base branch) conducts rebuilds when baseline changes   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'm also now seeing build storms from this issue. One can turn off "Periodically if not otherwise run" to prevent the storms, but then you're left with orphaned jobs being left behind when a branch is deleted. Therefore, if one tries to use the branch source plugin, they either have to deal with build storms, or with orphaned jobs.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-15 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble reopened an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42519  
 
 
  Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Joshua Noble  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 
 
Status: 
 Resolved Reopened  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Stephen Connolly  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42519) Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up

2018-03-15 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-42519  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Closed pull requests, branch jobs are not cleaned up   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I would like to bump this back up. Orphaned jobs should be deleted when an incoming webhook is received if the item strategy is set to 0. I also agree with Stephen Ash about JENKINS-37491. If a user wants to use GitHub Organization folders via the branch source plugin and build "merged" PR's, they either have to deal with build storms (by having "Periodically if not otherwise run" turned on) or deal with orphaned jobs. (By having "Periodically if not otherwise run" turned off, to prevent build storms)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-31197) New jobs are not creating a new container

2016-11-21 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-31197  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: New jobs are not creating a new container   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Dima Shmakov What version of Jenkins are you using? I tried your workaround with both the Throttle Concurrent and Single Use Slave plugins without any success.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-31197) New jobs are not creating a new container

2016-11-18 Thread ace...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Joshua Noble commented on  JENKINS-31197  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: New jobs are not creating a new container   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Any more movement on this issue? Given Docker's ephemeral nature we really should modify this plugin to fulfill the OP's request, as it also matches my own. We should be able to spin up multiple new slaves via ECS tasks for the same label. Currently only one slave can run at a time per label - that's a significant bottleneck. Would this logic be contained within this plugin's source - or within the Jenkins core? If someone could point me in the right direction, I might be able to attempt to spend a few cycles on this. Thanks!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.