[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-13103) Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17383852#comment-17383852 ] Luke Chen commented on KAFKA-13103: --- In the PR, I put the `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS` into retriable error. But keep `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` as failed since I also think it doesn't make sense to put `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` as retriable error. Thanks. > Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and > GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors? > -- > > Key: KAFKA-13103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: David Jacot >Assignee: Luke Chen >Priority: Major > > [~rajinisiva...@gmail.com] and I were discussing if we should consider > REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors in > the group handlers. I think that this could make sense, especially for > `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS`. `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` is more debatable as it > means that the handler would retry until the request timeout is reached. It > might be armful if the authorisation is really denied. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-13103) Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17383700#comment-17383700 ] Luke Chen commented on KAFKA-13103: --- I'll get the PR ready today (my time) in case this improvement wants to get into v3.0. Thanks. > Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and > GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors? > -- > > Key: KAFKA-13103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: David Jacot >Assignee: Luke Chen >Priority: Major > > [~rajinisiva...@gmail.com] and I were discussing if we should consider > REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors in > the group handlers. I think that this could make sense, especially for > `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS`. `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` is more debatable as it > means that the handler would retry until the request timeout is reached. It > might be armful if the authorisation is really denied. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-13103) Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17383338#comment-17383338 ] Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-13103: - What would be the justification for `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED`? `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS` seems really important though, would this be something we want to do for 3.0? Or is there a reason why it's ok for now? > Should group admin handlers consider REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and > GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors? > -- > > Key: KAFKA-13103 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13103 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: David Jacot >Assignee: Luke Chen >Priority: Major > > [~rajinisiva...@gmail.com] and I were discussing if we should consider > REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS and GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED as retryable errors in > the group handlers. I think that this could make sense, especially for > `REBALANCE_IN_PROGRESS`. `GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED` is more debatable as it > means that the handler would retry until the request timeout is reached. It > might be armful if the authorisation is really denied. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
