[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16350715#comment-16350715 ] Ronald van de Kuil commented on KAFKA-6496: --- Hey Manikumar! That was a very good tip! I have got it to work now. Thank you very much! Ronald > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349884#comment-16349884 ] Manikumar commented on KAFKA-6496: -- Try configuring "advertised.listeners" config property and make sure advertised host is reachable by zk. > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349848#comment-16349848 ] Ronald van de Kuil commented on KAFKA-6496: --- I did a test with Kafka behind a physical router with a NAT port forward. With wireshark I saw it return the internal IP address of the kafka server as part of the handshake. I did not get the communication to work. That was some months ago. The floating IP to fixed iP assignment is like NAT. That is why I expect the same for accessing kafka from a place outside the openstack tenant is similar. The IP address that will be returned during the handshake will be the internal IP adresses which will not be resolvable. > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16348230#comment-16348230 ] hanwei commented on KAFKA-6496: --- [~Ronald van de Kuil] Do you encounter any problem? I don't think it affect you to use kafka inside vm created by openstack. Because neutron will create nat rule for every vm, and your floating-ip will convert fix-ip automatically while passed to kafka inside vm. > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344888#comment-16344888 ] Ronald van de Kuil commented on KAFKA-6496: --- yes. I can image that other tenants projects - or applications that still reside on the physical network would want to subscribe to kafka in my virtual tenant project. And perhaps even subscribers outside of the private or public cloud. > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-6496) NAT and Kafka
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344420#comment-16344420 ] hanwei commented on KAFKA-6496: --- Do you mean that you start a vm using openstack, then you install kafka in the vm with fix-ip, and use kafka outside the vm with floating-ip? > NAT and Kafka > - > > Key: KAFKA-6496 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6496 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 1.0.0 >Reporter: Ronald van de Kuil >Priority: Critical > > Hi, > As far as I know Kafka itself does not support NAT based on a test that I did > with my physical router. > > I can imagine that a real use case exists where NAT is desirable. For > example, an OpenStack installation where Kafka hides behind floating ip > addresses. > > Are there any plans, to make Kafka NAT friendly? > > Best Regards, > Ronald -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
