Re: [josm-dev] JMapViewer versioning/backwards compatibility

2013-05-03 Thread Matt Hoover 
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote:

 On Sun, 28 Apr 2013, Felix Natter wrote:

  One concern is: Could you consider making JMapViewer releases with
 version numbers?  That would make the Debian packaging easier / more
 meaningful.


 Hmm. Open a ticket in JOSM ticket system. There is a JMapViewer component.
 Thought like for josm I would vote to simply use the SVN number.


That seems like a reasonable solution to me too.  I am unsure what changes
we could/should (?) make to JMapViewer on our end to include this version
number.  It is already available via the SVN.  Does it need to be hard
coded into binary releases somehow, or is it sufficient for the people
including it in Debian to know to use the SVN number?
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] preset syntax (problems)

2013-05-03 Thread Dirk Stöcker 

On Thu, 2 May 2013, colliar wrote:


Finally I do not understand match:
Is it possible to have a entry only active for certain type of object
and/or certain other tag on the objects ?

E.g.:
* have combo tag=service values=... only active if
highway=service is already chosen/tagged.
* have text tag=width  only active for ways but not for closed ways.


Match is do determine if a certain object is affected by that preset or 
not. This is mainly for the display of the matching presets for any 
object. This is necessary as otherwise some important presets would never 
be displayed automatically.


Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)


___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev