[jQuery] Re: jQuery minified
You nut bags forgot to mention to the noob, Use the AJAX hosted Google URL directly in your source code like so: http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/ jquery.min.js"> A lot of sites are using this so its already cached on people's browsers so the download is ZERO in a lot of cases. Hello? Sorry, didn't mean to call you all "nut bags". I really should have said "scrotums" as a proper term. On Oct 29, 4:05 pm, Mike wrote: > Hey guys, i've got two questions for you: > > 1. What/Where i cand find are the differences between the minified and > complete jQuery version?? what kind of things i can't use with > minified version?? > > 2. the first question was because i'm developping a big web site, we > want it to be visited for many users, so i'm worried about performance > and loading time, and i think 120K (complete jQuery version) could be > a bit too much. > I must confess i'm a noob with this "loading time" stuff :/, so any > advice you can give me is welcome. > > Thanks
[jQuery] enabling instance manipulation on a jQuery plugin
This topic is relevant because there are people asking how to enable manipulation on a jQuery plugin instance for plugin authors. I could not find a good answer to this. jQuery makes code simple and beautiful but has the side effect of locking away the ability to manipulate a plugin instance as far as I can tell unless you have a singleton approach. I'm fairly new to jQuery so forgive my ignorance if I missed this already being supported or documented. I have not found any documentation on this however. I would like to know the preferred way for enabling instance manipulation on a jquery plugin. I have rolled my own way of doing this by passing in an empty object as an option parameter, then the plugin adds public methods onto the object so the object's creator can call those methods outside of the plugin. I found this to be fairly simple and intuitive once you got your object reference because it bring it back to the familiar. An example of what I'm talking about is this: I created a simple plugin to transition images -> http://storage.sebringcreative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/jquery/dumbCrossFade.htm . A client later asked me to make them a slideshow with thumbnails that had transitions. I decided to use my plugin but wanted to extend it to allow for the capability of a consumer to be able to manipulate the instance so they could write something easily that could use the plugin only for what it needs to do but easily add functionality around it to create something more. I ended up with this: http://storage.sebringcreative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/jquery/slider.htm . You can see the consumer code is just using the plugin for what it does only and then adds its flavor on top to get the slideshow with thumbs to work with very little code. I would prefer to do it the correct way in the future since I have plans on making a nice image slider with thumbnail capability and thumbnail animation scroller as a full jquery plugin.
