Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Hah! you should post that to slashdot. It will start WWIII. Cheers, Nick --- Randolph S. Kahle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows 2000. Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than natively in Linux. Strange... I think the native SWT widgets make the difference. Are the SWT widgets native on OS/X ? -- Randy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 02:14 PM, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows 2000. Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than natively in Linux. Strange... I think the native SWT widgets make the difference. Are the SWT widgets native on OS/X ? Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my impression initially, especially in respect to why it took so long to port it to OS X. -warner -- Randy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
I double dog dare you. -Original Message- From: Lesiecki Nicholas [mailto:ndlesiecki;yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows Hah! you should post that to slashdot. It will start WWIII. Cheers, Nick --- Randolph S. Kahle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows 2000. Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than natively in Linux. Strange... I think the native SWT widgets make the difference. Are the SWT widgets native on OS/X ? -- Randy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
When is the next meeting? I would *love* to hear more about SWT and any eclipse plug-in development. Randy On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 16:00, Simon Ritchie wrote: Warner Onstine wrote: Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my impression initially, especially in respect to why it took so long to port it to OS X. -warner Yes, they are. SWT consists of some standard java code and also some JNI native code. The native code is written in C and is obviously unique to each OS. For instance, to run SWT standalone you need swt.jar and on Windows you need a .dll. On linux an .so, on Mac OS a .jnilib (whatever that is). Due to the lack of volunteers to present for the next meeting (and some proding from Vince and Nick) I've been thinking of doing a presentation on SWT. I've recently written a fairly simple plugin to Eclipse and although I'm still learning I might be able to put together something. Would anyone be interested? Simon. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Something on SWT would be great! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Randolph S. Kahle wrote: When is the next meeting? The next meeting is Tuesday, November 12th Simon. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
+1 on SWT preso, especially if there was some info on using it standalone and/or deployed using java web start, and/or on a Jeode JVM. Due to the lack of volunteers to present for the next meeting Well, thinking in a vaguely similar vein, the Thinlet.com stuff builds widgets entirely with AWT (no Swing). I've mucked around a bit with it, and if there was enough interest, I could come up with a short preso for a future meeting. I hope by next month btw, to have tried out enode.com stuff too. Cheers, Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
+2 for SWT At 03:59 PM 11/1/2002 -0700, you wrote: +1 for SWT -Original Message- From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie;amo.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows Warner Onstine wrote: Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my impression initially, especially in respect to why it took so long to port it to OS X. -warner Yes, they are. SWT consists of some standard java code and also some JNI native code. The native code is written in C and is obviously unique to each OS. For instance, to run SWT standalone you need swt.jar and on Windows you need a .dll. On linux an .so, on Mac OS a .jnilib (whatever that is). Due to the lack of volunteers to present for the next meeting (and some proding from Vince and Nick) I've been thinking of doing a presentation on SWT. I've recently written a fairly simple plugin to Eclipse and although I'm still learning I might be able to put together something. Would anyone be interested? Simon. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Oliver Chief Technology Officer AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 520.574.1150 Voice 520.844.1036 Fax 520.270.8862 Cell http://www.appsaspeers.com Home Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMS http://www.ollie.ezpeer.net Personal Home Page http://www.ollie.im-live.com/im-live/ Instant Chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo Instant Messenger MikeOliverAZ Aol Instant Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber Instant Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Odigo Instant Messenger It that's not enough there are more proprietary networks you can get me on but if you aren't on them...too bad...you just have to use one of these. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
+1 From Me too... --- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for SWT -Original Message- From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie;amo.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows Warner Onstine wrote: Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my impression initially, especially in respect to why it took so long to port it to OS X. -warner Yes, they are. SWT consists of some standard java code and also some JNI native code. The native code is written in C and is obviously unique to each OS. For instance, to run SWT standalone you need swt.jar and on Windows you need a .dll. On linux an .so, on Mac OS a .jnilib (whatever that is). Due to the lack of volunteers to present for the next meeting (and some proding from Vince and Nick) I've been thinking of doing a presentation on SWT. I've recently written a fairly simple plugin to Eclipse and although I'm still learning I might be able to put together something. Would anyone be interested? Simon. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
