Re: Juju on Reddit

[José Antonio Rey]

Hey, Matthew!

Checking on the guidelines, the subreddit will not be considered
abandoned unless all of the moderators are inactive for 60 or more days.
So we should be good to go!

Also, did you guys figure out the flair thing?

On 05/21/2014 01:14 PM, Matthew Williams wrote:
 Thanks for the help folks,
 
 This subreddit did belong to someone else but had only two posts from
 ages ago - so was counted as being abandoned, I had to make a request to
 take it over. I think we have 60 days to demonstrate that we're using it
 or it will get reverted back to the original owner, so if we can try to
 post relevant things to it at least every once in a while we'll be ok
 
 
 On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Wayne Witzel
 wayne.wit...@canonical.com mailto:wayne.wit...@canonical.com wrote:
 
 I'm wwitzel3 on reddit, we probably have plenty of moderators, but
 feel free to add me, I'll help out when I can.
 
 Thanks.
 
 
 On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Matthew Williams
 matthew.willi...@canonical.com
 mailto:matthew.willi...@canonical.com wrote:
 
 Hi Folks,
 
 We now have a subreddit for posting topics about juju:
 
 http://www.reddit.com/r/juju
 
 I'm looking for volunteers who would like to help with being
 moderators.
 
 Feel free to start posting links
 
 Thanks
 
 Matty
 
 --
 Juju mailing list
 Juju@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Wayne Witzel III
 wayne.wit...@canonical.com mailto:wayne.wit...@canonical.com
 
 
 
 

-- 
José Antonio Rey

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: reverting (fixing?) r2814

[Andrew Wilkins]

I haven't looked at the revision in question, so lack context, but just
wanted to point out that sort.Stable is Go 1.2+


On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:05 PM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:

 So I missed this when it was up for review, but I think the approach it
 takes is actually incorrect.

 The patch as it stands sorts the list that we supplied to put 'localhost'
 addresses first. However, that interferes with the logic that we want to
 put the last one we successfully connected to first.

 Now, the fix *might* just be to use sort.Stable instead of just
 sort.Sort.  As long as all the things that aren't localhost aren't
 moved around, then we can keep the property that whatever you successfully
 connected to last time, you'll try to use next time.

 Also, it would see the tests as written aren't actually valid because
 something named localhost1 is not localhost. It should probably be
 localhost:1 if we want to use that syntax.

 John
 =:-

 --
 Juju-dev mailing list
 Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev


-- 
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev