Re: Hung up post 2.0 upgrade? juju-unregister to the rescue!
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Charles Butler wrote: > Greetings! > > I was in #juju riffing with some juju users, and it became apparent that > there is a not-so-well-known feature of juju in the 2.0+ series. > > As 2.0 is not marked as stable, every new release is treated like an > island. Sometimes it may be compatible with what you have deployed (eg > beta-12 to beta-13) and won't require a re-bootstrap, everything will > *appear* to just work. Sometimes the risk and failure is much more apparent > than this, such as the beta-13 to beta-14 update. > > Traditionally you would terminate the instances via your cloud provider > and be left with some configuration left around in your $JUJU_DATA > directory. Less than ideal right? > > juju unregister to the rescue! > > Details: > Removes local connection information for the specified controller. > This command does not destroy the controller. In order to regain > access to an unregistered controller, it will need to be added > again using the juju register command. > > I thought I would share this great discovery with others that are being > intrepid and helping us test 2.0 > There is this bug to make "juju unregister" a bit more prominent: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1607303 -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Re: Hung up post 2.0 upgrade? juju-unregister to the rescue!
+1'd Good looking out Adam. That's a great place to xref in the help text! On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:55 AM Adam Collard wrote: > Adding heat to https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1607303 welcomed. > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 13:50 Charles Butler > wrote: > >> Greetings! >> >> I was in #juju riffing with some juju users, and it became apparent that >> there is a not-so-well-known feature of juju in the 2.0+ series. >> >> As 2.0 is not marked as stable, every new release is treated like an >> island. Sometimes it may be compatible with what you have deployed (eg >> beta-12 to beta-13) and won't require a re-bootstrap, everything will >> *appear* to just work. Sometimes the risk and failure is much more apparent >> than this, such as the beta-13 to beta-14 update. >> >> Traditionally you would terminate the instances via your cloud provider >> and be left with some configuration left around in your $JUJU_DATA >> directory. Less than ideal right? >> >> juju unregister to the rescue! >> >> Details: >> Removes local connection information for the specified controller. >> This command does not destroy the controller. In order to regain >> access to an unregistered controller, it will need to be added >> again using the juju register command. >> >> I thought I would share this great discovery with others that are being >> intrepid and helping us test 2.0 >> >> All the best, >> >> Charles >> -- >> Juju Charmer >> Canonical Group Ltd. >> Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com >> Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com >> > -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> > -- Juju Charmer Canonical Group Ltd. Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Re: Hung up post 2.0 upgrade? juju-unregister to the rescue!
Adding heat to https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1607303 welcomed. On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 13:50 Charles Butler wrote: > Greetings! > > I was in #juju riffing with some juju users, and it became apparent that > there is a not-so-well-known feature of juju in the 2.0+ series. > > As 2.0 is not marked as stable, every new release is treated like an > island. Sometimes it may be compatible with what you have deployed (eg > beta-12 to beta-13) and won't require a re-bootstrap, everything will > *appear* to just work. Sometimes the risk and failure is much more apparent > than this, such as the beta-13 to beta-14 update. > > Traditionally you would terminate the instances via your cloud provider > and be left with some configuration left around in your $JUJU_DATA > directory. Less than ideal right? > > juju unregister to the rescue! > > Details: > Removes local connection information for the specified controller. > This command does not destroy the controller. In order to regain > access to an unregistered controller, it will need to be added > again using the juju register command. > > I thought I would share this great discovery with others that are being > intrepid and helping us test 2.0 > > All the best, > > Charles > -- > Juju Charmer > Canonical Group Ltd. > Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com > Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Hung up post 2.0 upgrade? juju-unregister to the rescue!
Greetings! I was in #juju riffing with some juju users, and it became apparent that there is a not-so-well-known feature of juju in the 2.0+ series. As 2.0 is not marked as stable, every new release is treated like an island. Sometimes it may be compatible with what you have deployed (eg beta-12 to beta-13) and won't require a re-bootstrap, everything will *appear* to just work. Sometimes the risk and failure is much more apparent than this, such as the beta-13 to beta-14 update. Traditionally you would terminate the instances via your cloud provider and be left with some configuration left around in your $JUJU_DATA directory. Less than ideal right? juju unregister to the rescue! Details: Removes local connection information for the specified controller. This command does not destroy the controller. In order to regain access to an unregistered controller, it will need to be added again using the juju register command. I thought I would share this great discovery with others that are being intrepid and helping us test 2.0 All the best, Charles -- Juju Charmer Canonical Group Ltd. Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
