Re: Multiple networks with JUJU and 3rd party Cinder integration.

2014-10-31 Thread Nate dell
Thanks Dimiter!
This sense all makes good sense!
I'm labing out the suggestions and will see how it goes.
Really appreciate the help I've received from the list.
Thanks again!

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Dimiter Naydenov 
dimiter.nayde...@canonical.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 25.10.2014 03:13, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
  On 24/10/14 15:28, Nate dell wrote:
  I'll look at binding specific cdrs to the openstack charms. It
  sounds like your suggesting using a configuration management
  system like salt, ansible, puppet, or chef in conjunction with
  juju. Ansible is setup at the client so will look to integrate
  the two, was reluctant to do that out of fears they would step on
  each other. The IRC channel has been very helpful in providing
  suggestions on how to proceed on the cinder side.

 Hey Nate,

 Thanks for considering Juju for your scenario!

 
  The different systems can easily be made to be polite to one
  another :)
 
  In a little while you'll be able to specify a charm to put on
  every machine, or groups of machine, and that will probably be a
  cleaner way to handle the baseline machine setup.
 
  Mark
 
 In the mean-time, until Juju starts to provide this feature, you can
 consider a workaround.

 It looks like all openstack charms can have a subordinate unit (on the
 same machine) via the hacluster relation. If you write a shared
 subordinate charm, deploy it, and relate it to the openstack services
 you need to configure, you can have the same code executing on each
 machine.

 I hope this helps,
 - --
 Dimiter Naydenov dimiter.nayde...@canonical.com
 juju-core team
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUS909AAoJENzxV2TbLzHw7qoH/3T1fxB1ugJ5cJUTGvlPIF6p
 BPq0xe3VwS82aCFDEbZZMwOsWhb8IlWtcuDTc0kS0zJRm5ZVwq0CZq5tIIYC30+V
 pDmKBqGup8O6W8WyqWv80vssUOFt1gfMhL8OrRNJO/pklXD7J4i9qDiIx/Y3dYBu
 vQBh8RbHZ0V/mESQ7yMgrJ1k9KdbvTLxpnUk5m+J2EfBAGfGbWZEdSeakGPb6DSo
 yebmR1ThI0AP+srxx1mlDUo6p0MbNXe4VXlDu2oG8nOJg7A6sYKuCyYICO4lgq3p
 gomxILNLHARCPY0O8tjNqQAiykW+OxdzxE1v0pb96xVnIrjpe1h50Ba3qrDwvX4=
 =dhJp
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-




-- 
Nathaniel Dell
President
NDDIT.com
917 991 8260
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


Re: Multiple networks with JUJU and 3rd party Cinder integration.

2014-10-31 Thread Nate dell
Thanks for the clarification and all the help!!
Really really appreciate it!

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On 25/10/14 18:26, Dimiter Naydenov wrote:
  In the mean-time, until Juju starts to provide this feature, you can
  consider a workaround.
 
  It looks like all openstack charms can have a subordinate unit (on the
  same machine) via the hacluster relation. If you write a shared
  subordinate charm, deploy it, and relate it to the openstack services
  you need to configure, you can have the same code executing on each
  machine.

 Yes, this is a good workaround IF you are happy for this code to run
 AFTER the main charm is installed. In cases where you need the
 subordinate to run first (typically if you need to install drivers or
 authenticate to networks before you can setup the main service) then
 subordinate workarounds won't work.

 Mark




-- 
Nathaniel Dell
President
NDDIT.com
917 991 8260
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


Re: Multiple networks with JUJU and 3rd party Cinder integration.

2014-10-25 Thread Dimiter Naydenov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 25.10.2014 03:13, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
 On 24/10/14 15:28, Nate dell wrote:
 I'll look at binding specific cdrs to the openstack charms. It
 sounds like your suggesting using a configuration management
 system like salt, ansible, puppet, or chef in conjunction with
 juju. Ansible is setup at the client so will look to integrate
 the two, was reluctant to do that out of fears they would step on
 each other. The IRC channel has been very helpful in providing
 suggestions on how to proceed on the cinder side.

Hey Nate,

Thanks for considering Juju for your scenario!

 
 The different systems can easily be made to be polite to one
 another :)
 
 In a little while you'll be able to specify a charm to put on
 every machine, or groups of machine, and that will probably be a
 cleaner way to handle the baseline machine setup.
 
 Mark
 
In the mean-time, until Juju starts to provide this feature, you can
consider a workaround.

It looks like all openstack charms can have a subordinate unit (on the
same machine) via the hacluster relation. If you write a shared
subordinate charm, deploy it, and relate it to the openstack services
you need to configure, you can have the same code executing on each
machine.

I hope this helps,
- -- 
Dimiter Naydenov dimiter.nayde...@canonical.com
juju-core team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUS909AAoJENzxV2TbLzHw7qoH/3T1fxB1ugJ5cJUTGvlPIF6p
BPq0xe3VwS82aCFDEbZZMwOsWhb8IlWtcuDTc0kS0zJRm5ZVwq0CZq5tIIYC30+V
pDmKBqGup8O6W8WyqWv80vssUOFt1gfMhL8OrRNJO/pklXD7J4i9qDiIx/Y3dYBu
vQBh8RbHZ0V/mESQ7yMgrJ1k9KdbvTLxpnUk5m+J2EfBAGfGbWZEdSeakGPb6DSo
yebmR1ThI0AP+srxx1mlDUo6p0MbNXe4VXlDu2oG8nOJg7A6sYKuCyYICO4lgq3p
gomxILNLHARCPY0O8tjNqQAiykW+OxdzxE1v0pb96xVnIrjpe1h50Ba3qrDwvX4=
=dhJp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju


Re: Multiple networks with JUJU and 3rd party Cinder integration.

2014-10-24 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 24/10/14 15:28, Nate dell wrote:
 I'll look at binding specific cdrs to the openstack charms. It sounds like
 your suggesting using a configuration management system like salt, ansible,
 puppet, or chef in conjunction with juju. Ansible is setup at the client so
 will look to integrate the two, was reluctant to do that out of fears they
 would step on each other. The IRC channel has been very helpful in
 providing suggestions on how to proceed on the cinder side.

The different systems can easily be made to be polite to one another :)

In a little while you'll be able to specify a charm to put on every
machine, or groups of machine, and that will probably be a cleaner way
to handle the baseline machine setup.

Mark

-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju