[julia-users] Re: Indexing Array with empty vector in v.0.4.
That would also be fine with me, if there is a WARNING: Indexing with Integers would be faster or something like that. And once we are here, it would also be convenient if indexing with an empty Array (whatever its element type) would always return empty, and that minimum([]) did not error, but return empty too, etc. I guess many functions could safely return Empty when applied on Empty. But these are petty niceties that can easily be circumvented with if isempty... else... branches.
[julia-users] Re: Indexing Array with empty vector in v.0.4.
But I think Julia started off as very intuitive and educational and I hope it will continue on this road =) + 1e1e1e...
[julia-users] Re: Indexing Array with empty vector in v.0.4.
This is actually one of the biggest missing features in most programming languages. Giving good interactive feedback and educating people instead of disallowing things just because these noobs can't deal with it anywaysaand because its actually pretty hard to give good feedback :D But I think Julia started off as very intuitive and educational and I hope it will continue on this road =) Am Samstag, 18. Juli 2015 12:00:16 UTC+2 schrieb Felipe Jiménez: Say A is an Array, like A = [1 2 3 4], and I index it with an empty vector. In Julia v.0.3, A[[]] is empty. I find this convenient when programming. In Julia v.0.4, A[[]] throws an error. Is this intended? It sometimes forces me to code if isempty()... else... My version is 0.4.0-dev+5841 (2015-07-07 14:58 UTC), Commit f428392* (10 days old master), x86_64-w64-mingw32. Thank you.
[julia-users] Re: Indexing Array with empty vector in v.0.4.
Thanks, Yichao Yu, Int[] does solve it for me. Hope you found how to make your irrelevant denormals not slow down your code. For what I do, I would also agree to flush them all to 0 if that speeds up my code significantly.
