[julia-users] Re: Julia 0.4 warnings and how to fix

[Michael Francis]

Thanks

Does anybody have a pointer to why operators are not imported in 0.4 by 
default?  

On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 12:36:14 PM UTC-4, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>
> Thanks! I was trying to figure out how to do Base.== for a long time. It 
> turns out the proper way to do it is as follows (found this in 
> DataArrays.jl):
>
> Base.(:(==))( ... ) 
>

[julia-users] Re: Julia 0.4 warnings and how to fix

[Tony Kelman]

https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8113
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/12235


On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 10:22:05 AM UTC-7, Michael Francis wrote:
>
> Thanks
>
> Does anybody have a pointer to why operators are not imported in 0.4 by 
> default?  
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 12:36:14 PM UTC-4, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! I was trying to figure out how to do Base.== for a long time. It 
>> turns out the proper way to do it is as follows (found this in 
>> DataArrays.jl):
>>
>> Base.(:(==))( ... ) 
>>
>

[julia-users] Re: Julia 0.4 warnings and how to fix

[Michael Francis]

Thanks - have to say this removal makes no sense to me. We will in the next 
revision 0.5 of Julia allow accidental shadowing of == (and associated) 
operators. Seems like a regressive step. 

On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 1:53:47 PM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8113
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/12235
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 10:22:05 AM UTC-7, Michael Francis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Does anybody have a pointer to why operators are not imported in 0.4 by 
>> default?  
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 12:36:14 PM UTC-4, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks! I was trying to figure out how to do Base.== for a long time. It 
>>> turns out the proper way to do it is as follows (found this in 
>>> DataArrays.jl):
>>>
>>> Base.(:(==))( ... ) 
>>>
>>

[julia-users] Re: Julia 0.4 warnings and how to fix

[Tim Wheeler]

Thanks! I was trying to figure out how to do Base.== for a long time. It 
turns out the proper way to do it is as follows (found this in 
DataArrays.jl):

Base.(:(==))( ... )