Re: [j-nsp] Error while validating a JunOS

2012-12-04 Thread Phil Mayers

On 12/04/2012 02:13 AM, Julien Goodwin wrote:


I have retained domestic download access for SRX.


It's probably the new download page, there's a dropdown for domestic vs
worldwide that's a little non-obvious.


Oh for the love of...

Thanks for this; I hadn't spotted that at all. Insert suitably 
embarrassing analogy here.


Cheers,
Phil
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] small multitenant datacenter

2012-12-04 Thread Benny Amorsen
Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.net writes:

 Do you see an issue with blowing up ex4200s with all this ospf and
 vrrp? I'm labbing tomorrow and will try to get the boxes to thrash.
 From a routing table size POV I'm not worried (many customers having
 no extra routes, lots have 4-6, a handful having as many as 30 or 40),
 I'm a little concerned all those processes might upset the RE if
 things get flappy. I can handle a little bump but if they just freak
 out that wouldn't be good.

I do not really have much experience with EX-series and layer 3. I let
the MX80s do the VRRP and OSPF, which has not been entirely smooth
sailing lately.

 Good thought. Can you hook up L3 addresses to the inner tags on EX
 boxes? I'll have to play with that.

No, the EX4200 would have to handle a dual tag push, and the hardware
can't do that. Rumour has it that the EX4500 and EX4550 has the
necessary hardware, but even if that turns out to be true, their
software can't do it (yet?).


/Benny

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] small multitenant datacenter

2012-12-04 Thread Benny Amorsen
Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.net writes:

 I will re-review what we may need/what may be lacking. It seems the
 3300s are catching up, and we have had good luck in small
 single-tenant deployments (3 vmware host + SAN), using them strictly
 as stacked L2 switches, generally in place of a pair of 3750x or
 2960s.

I avoid the EX3300 because it requires a feature license for q-in-q
tunneling. Even HP has stopped doing that.

Personally I find it confusing that feature licenses are so different
across the EX series. It is probably unavoidable that not all hardware
is equally capable feature-wise, but checking for which features need a
license on which box is a bit of a nightmare. Not as bad as a certain
other vendor, but still.


/Benny
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] VSTP

2012-12-04 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi all
I have a bridge domain working on several vlans
The election of the bridge switch is based on the bridge-ID which consists
of the system MAC address and the priority which is by default 32768
I am trying to figure out who is the root bridge of my domain but could not
find it
I issued the command run show spanning bridge and got the mac address of
the root bridge , but when searching for it among the other devices could
not find a match , i used the command show chassis mac
Any ideas?

BR,
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] VSTP

2012-12-04 Thread Graham Brown
Hi Mohammed,

From the command you ran you should see the bridge ID for the switch you
are connected to and that of the root bridge. Don't forget that this may be
the same switch. If it is not, look at the root port and work your way
through the switched network. If nothing else you will also know what your
topology really looks like and also work out which switch will become root
if you lose the current root bridge, along with how this would change the
topology.

HTH,
Graham

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Mohammad Khalil wrote:

 Hi all
 I have a bridge domain working on several vlans
 The election of the bridge switch is based on the bridge-ID which consists
 of the system MAC address and the priority which is by default 32768
 I am trying to figure out who is the root bridge of my domain but could not
 find it
 I issued the command run show spanning bridge and got the mac address of
 the root bridge , but when searching for it among the other devices could
 not find a match , i used the command show chassis mac
 Any ideas?

 BR,
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net javascript:;
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



-- 
-sent from my iPad; please excuse spelling, grammar and brevity-
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


[j-nsp] OSPF on a VRRP Interface

2012-12-04 Thread Luca Salvatore
Hi,

If I run OSPF on an interface that is also running VRRP, is it possible for 
OSPF to use the VRRP virtual IP as the next-hop for ospf neighbours?

Thanks,

Luca

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] OSPF on a VRRP Interface

2012-12-04 Thread Per Westerlund
Why would you want to do that (assuming you are running OSPF on all VRRP group 
members)?

/Per

Sent from my iPad, please ignore stupid spelling corrections!

5 dec 2012 kl. 05:57 skrev Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com:

 Hi,
 
 If I run OSPF on an interface that is also running VRRP, is it possible for 
 OSPF to use the VRRP virtual IP as the next-hop for ospf neighbours?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Luca
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


Re: [j-nsp] OSPF on a VRRP Interface

2012-12-04 Thread Luca Salvatore
It was just a thought, I was having some issues but turns out I was missing an 
OSPF neighbour... doh!


Luca


-Original Message-
From: Per Westerlund [mailto:p...@westerlund.se] 
Sent: Wednesday, 5 December 2012 4:10 PM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] OSPF on a VRRP Interface

Why would you want to do that (assuming you are running OSPF on all VRRP group 
members)?

/Per

Sent from my iPad, please ignore stupid spelling corrections!

5 dec 2012 kl. 05:57 skrev Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com:

 Hi,
 
 If I run OSPF on an interface that is also running VRRP, is it possible for 
 OSPF to use the VRRP virtual IP as the next-hop for ospf neighbours?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Luca
 
 ___
 juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp