Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 virtual chassis and PoE
Javier Valero wrote: > Hello Victor, > > I don't know if it's the case, but POE does not work on EX4200 with DC power > supplies. > Need to use AC power supplies instead. All my EX4200s are identical with two AC power supplies. Anyway, an EX4200 with DC power supplies would not probably display the kind of "show poe interface" I had posted. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[j-nsp] jaa-nat cgnat license
Has anyone had to scale up their cgnat yet ? .to the extent that you had to purchase and install additional throughput licenses for your cgnat ? I'm running MX960 with MS-MPC-128G and I plan on moving lots of my customers behind it so I'm purchasing more JAA-NAT-10 I'd like to hear from someone who actually installed the JAA-NAT-x (1,10,100) cgnat license and exactly how they did it. cli commands please with show output before and after would be nice. -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] Manually creating a static route (or access route) in a DHCP dynamic subscriber management environment
AFAIK from LNS (but probably the same issue ) in Tomcat you can not use static route to subscriber Only via radius I suspect it is because there is no IFL for the subscriber only flow but take a look on https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configuration-statement/routing-services-edit-dynamic-profiles-interfaces.html It might help Nitzan On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:52 PM Alex D. wrote: > Hello, > > does anyone know, if it is possible to manually configure a static route > (or access route) with a next-hop assigned to a demux logical interface > in a DHCP dynamic subscriber management setup ? > I know, that the common way to route a subnet to a subscriber is by > assigning the specific route by RADIUS using the Framed-Route attribute. > In my lab setup, this works fine, but currently we don't use RADIUS > authentication in production yet. This will be implemented soon, but > unfortunately i need to route a subnet to a subscriber now. > Today i just tried to manually configure a route, but it didn't work. > Output of "show route" looks strange (no next-hop specified) > > detzen@vs-mx5-testlab.6898# run show route 192.1.2.0/29 > inet.0: 1977 destinations, 3901 routes (1977 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > 192.1.2.0/29 *[Static/5] 00:11:17, metric2 0 > > > > In contrast, the output when assigning the route by RADIUS with the > Framed-Route attribute: > > detzen@vs-mx5-testlab.6898> show route 192.1.2.0/29 > inet.0: 1980 destinations, 3907 routes (1980 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > 192.1.2.0/29 *[Access/13] 00:00:35 >Private unicast > > > Regards, > Alex > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 virtual chassis and PoE
Hello Victor, I don't know if it's the case, but POE does not work on EX4200 with DC power supplies. Need to use AC power supplies instead. Regards. -Mensaje original- De: juniper-nsp En nombre de Victor Sudakov Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2019 8:19 Para: juniper-nsp Asunto: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 virtual chassis and PoE Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 07:13:43PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Do I need to know anything special to configure PoE in a virtual > > chassis environment? For some reason PoE devices on ports ge-1/0/2 > > and ge-1/0/3 do not get power while the same device in port ge-0/0/2 > > does. All details below. > > Sounds like a bug. While I am not doing any PoE on any EX4200's, I > have a EX2200 stack with a POE version on the FPC 1 position. I've just tried another pair of identical EX4200s in a virtual-chassis, and PoE on the second FPC works fine. Seems like a hardware problem on the second chassis of the first pair. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
