Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Saku Ytti]

On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 22:24, Giuliano C. Medalha
 wrote:

> - No support for FAT  (no roadmap);
> - No support for Entropy Label  (no roadmap);
> - No support for Output Policer or HQOS for VPLS / L2Circuit (no roadmap);
> - ACX does not support load balance parsing the payload on lag interface (no 
> roadmap);
> - Some problems with arp flooding for the main CPU (initial JUNOS releases 
> but I think they have solve it);
> - IRB on VPLS is not supported;
> - Not possible to monitor the real-time traffic on sub-interfaces using CLI 
> (only with SNMP)

When were you communicated these? They differ significantly from what
was communicated to me.

-- 
  ++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Giuliano C. Medalha]

Hello

We did some initial lab teste using 5448 for a client and we have checked with 
JUNIPER.

The major problems we found for our client environment:

- No support for FAT  (no roadmap);
- No support for Entropy Label  (no roadmap);
- No support for Output Policer or HQOS for VPLS / L2Circuit (no roadmap);
- ACX does not support load balance parsing the payload on lag interface (no 
roadmap);
- Some problems with arp flooding for the main CPU (initial JUNOS releases but 
I think they have solve it);
- IRB on VPLS is not supported;
- Not possible to monitor the real-time traffic on sub-interfaces using CLI 
(only with SNMP)

It is good to check with them to see if those functions would work ate some new 
releases (some day ...).

Att,

Giuliano

-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp  On Behalf Of Luis 
Balbinot
Sent: terça-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2020 16:59
To: Aaron Gould 
Cc: jnsp list 
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

The 5448 and the 5048 are quite different. I have several 5048 in my plant and 
when we questioned Juniper about a replacement with 100G interfaces their 
engineers compared the config template from our 5048s and said the
5448 wasn't capable of doing some of the RSVP and RPM stuff we were doing on 
the 5048. This was about 6 months ago.

Luis

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:45 PM Aaron Gould  wrote:

> I've had an ACX5448 in my lab on loaner for over a year.  I need to
> refresh myself on how well it performed.  I have the little-brother
> ACX5048, probably 50 of them all over my network doing quite well.
> Pretty sure those are not Trio based.
>
> Never heard of the ACX710, but see it in slide 22 here ...
>
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsene
> tsy.ru%2Fupload%2Fjuniper-summit-2019%2F5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Ev
> data=02%7C01%7Cgiuliano%40wztech.com.br%7Cf47f0378dce54349a9d208d
> 79eac77dd%7C584787b077bd4312bf8815412b8ae504%7C1%7C1%7C637152335925921
> 914sdata=O6x7rQJ2OdQeVpdjsWEeWW%2BbUfvLWShaDrb0itRc%2FRk%3Dr
> eserved=0
> genii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf
>  etsy.ru%2Fupload%2Fjuniper-summit-2019%2F5G-ready_Transport_Networks_E
> vgenii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdfdata=02%7C01%7Cgiuliano%40wztech.com.br
> %7Cf47f0378dce54349a9d208d79eac77dd%7C584787b077bd4312bf8815412b8ae504
> %7C1%7C1%7C637152335925921914sdata=kaF077Ymm7a4T4QDuI6Y2R8KRZnyuc
> s0lDGH838NJ%2F0%3Dreserved=0>
> ACX710 and ACX753.  I'm curious about interfaces and modules and
> capabilities of both of them.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck
> .nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fjuniper-nspdata=02%7C01%7Cgiul
> iano%40wztech.com.br%7Cf47f0378dce54349a9d208d79eac77dd%7C584787b077bd
> 4312bf8815412b8ae504%7C1%7C1%7C637152335925921914sdata=bQ7iLaxJOi
> Gj730LNO2u4gH64TpYWJMYC5exorh69bI%3Dreserved=0
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fjuniper-nspdata=02%7C01%7Cgiuliano%40wztech.com.br%7Cf47f0378dce54349a9d208d79eac77dd%7C584787b077bd4312bf8815412b8ae504%7C1%7C1%7C637152335925921914sdata=bQ7iLaxJOiGj730LNO2u4gH64TpYWJMYC5exorh69bI%3Dreserved=0

WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS.
Copyright © 2018 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved.

IMPORTANTE:
As informações deste e-mail e o conteúdo dos eventuais documentos anexos são 
confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinatário. Se o leitor desta 
mensagem não for o seu destinatário, fica desde já notificado de que não poderá 
divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a terceiros das 
informações e do conteúdo dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, favor comunicar 
imediatamente o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou telefonando ao mesmo, e 
em seguida apague-o.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are 
solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, transmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete the material from any computer, including any copies.

WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS.
Copyright © 2018 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved.

IMPORTANTE:
As informações deste e-mail e o conteúdo dos eventuais documentos anexos são 
confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinatário. Se o leitor desta 
mensagem não for o seu destinatário, fica desde já notificado de que não poderá 
divulgar, distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a terceiros das 
informações e do conteúdo dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, 

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Luis Balbinot]

The 5448 and the 5048 are quite different. I have several 5048 in my plant
and when we questioned Juniper about a replacement with 100G interfaces
their engineers compared the config template from our 5048s and said the
5448 wasn't capable of doing some of the RSVP and RPM stuff we were doing
on the 5048. This was about 6 months ago.

Luis

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:45 PM Aaron Gould  wrote:

> I've had an ACX5448 in my lab on loaner for over a year.  I need to refresh
> myself on how well it performed.  I have the little-brother ACX5048,
> probably 50 of them all over my network doing quite well.  Pretty sure
> those
> are not Trio based.
>
> Never heard of the ACX710, but see it in slide 22 here ...
>
> https://senetsy.ru/upload/juniper-summit-2019/5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Ev
> genii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf
> 
> ACX710 and ACX753.  I'm curious about interfaces and modules and
> capabilities of both of them.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Aaron Gould]

I've had an ACX5448 in my lab on loaner for over a year.  I need to refresh
myself on how well it performed.  I have the little-brother ACX5048,
probably 50 of them all over my network doing quite well.  Pretty sure those
are not Trio based.

Never heard of the ACX710, but see it in slide 22 here ...
https://senetsy.ru/upload/juniper-summit-2019/5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Ev
genii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf
ACX710 and ACX753.  I'm curious about interfaces and modules and
capabilities of both of them.

-Aaron


___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Mark Tinka]

Hi all.

My Juniper SE is pressuring me to test the ACX boxes per subject.

These are shipping with Jericoh 2c and Qumran 2c chip sets.

For anyone that has deployed these, are you happy, particularly if you
have previous Trio experience?

As some of you know, I generally shy away from merchant silicon,
especially from traditional equipment vendors such as Juniper and Cisco.

All feedback is much appreciated. Thanks.

Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp